The 1991 Criminal Justice Act introduced new legislation governing the way children may testify in courts in England and Wales. Helen Westcott reviews these legislative reforms in the light of recent research on child witnesses, and highlights some of the difficulties which will still remain for children called to testify.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaxterJ. S., ‘The suggestibility of child witnesses: A review’, Applied Cognitive Psychology4, 393–407, 1990.
2.
BenedekE. P.SchetkyD. H., Allegations of sexual abuse in child custody cases. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Nassau, Bahamas, 1984.
3.
StewartClarke AThompsonWLeporeS, Manipulating children's interpretations through interrogation. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Child Development, Kansas City, USA, 1989.
4.
DaviesG. M.NoonE, An evaluation of the live link for child witnesses, London, Home Office, 1991.
5.
DentH. R.StephensonG. M., ‘An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses’, British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology18, 41–51, 1979.
6.
EversonM. D.BoatB. W., ‘False allegations of sexual abuse by children and adolescents’, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychology28 (2), 230–235, 1989.
7.
FallerK. C., Child sexual abuse: An interdisciplinary manual for diagnosis, care management and treatment, New York, Columbia University Press, 1988.
8.
FlinR. H.BoonJKnoxABullR, ‘The effect of a five-month delay on children's and adults’ eyewitness memory, In press, British Journal of Psychology.
9.
FlinR. H.BullRBoonJKnoxA, Child witnesses in Scottish criminal prosecutions. Report to the Scottish Home and Health Department, Glasgow, Glasgow College of Technology, 1990.
10.
GoodwinJSahdDRadaR. T., ‘Incest hoax: False accusations, false denials’, Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law6, 269–276, 1979.
11.
JonesD. P. H.McGrawJ. M., ‘Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse of children’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence2, 27–45, 1987.
12.
LoftusE. F.DaviesG. M., ‘Distortions in the memory of children’, Journal of Social Issues40 (2), 51–67, 1984.
13.
LoftusE. F.PalmerJ. C., ‘Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of inter-action between language and memory’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 13585–589, 1974.
14.
PetersJ. J., ‘Children who are victims of sexual assault and the psychology of offenders’, American Journal of Psychotherapy30, 399–421, 1979.
15.
PigotT, Report of the Advisory Group on Video Evidence, London, Home Office, 1989.
16.
SmithPWilsonA, ‘The Criminal Justice Bill and the Pigot Proposals’, Family Law, 323–325, 1991.
17.
SpencerJ. R., ‘Pigot and children's evidence: The Criminal Justice Bill 1990’, The Journal of Child Law, 3 (2), 34–36, 1991.
18.
SpencerJ. R.FlinR. H., The evidence of children: The law and the psychology, London, Blackstone Press, 1990.
19.
VizardE, ‘Interviewing young, sexually abused children—assessment techniques’, Family Law28–33, 1987.
20.
WalkerL. E. A., ‘New techniques for assessment and evaluation of child sexual abuse victims: Using anatomically “correct” dolls and videotape procedures’, in WalkerL. E. A. (ed), Handbook on sexual abuse of children: assessment and treatment issues, Springer Publishing, 1988.
21.
WattamC, Disclosure: the child's perspective, London, NSPCC, 1990.
22.
WestcottH. L.DaviesG. M.CliffordB. R., ‘The credibility of child witnesses seen on closed-circuit television’, Adoption & Fostering151, 14–19, 1991a.
23.
WestcottH. L.DaviesG. M.CliffordB. R., ‘Adults' perceptions of children's videotaped truthful and deceptive statements’, Children & Society5 (2), 123–135, 1991b.
