Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
(1971 ) A C 682
2.
(1971 ) 2 All E R 1230
3.Re L 106 S J 611
4.op cit note 1 pp699 –700
5.op cit note 1 p699
6.op cit note 1 p709 (per Lord MacDermott)
7.5 Family Law
181 ; The Times 1 May 1975
8.Child Adoption No 81 p10
9.
(1977 ) 1 All E R 145
10.
(1977 ) 1 All E R 145 p150
11.
(1977 ) 1 All E R 145 pp 153 –4 , 164 , 165
12.
pp 4 –6 particularly proposition 2
13.
para 173
14.Report on Adoption Act 1958 (1968 ) para 8
15.
Cmnd 5107 para 216
16.
H L vol 356 cols 782–99
17.
H L vol 356 col 18
18.
H L vol 359 col 544
19.
In a Memorandum circulated on 19 February 1975
20.op cit note 8 pp160 –1
21.op cit note 8 p161
22.op cit note 8 p153
23.
For example Cretney 126 New Law Journal 671, 672
24.op cit note 1 p699. See also Lord Reid in O'Connor v. A and B op cit note 2 at 1232: ‘no doubt the child's interests come first and in some cases they may be paramount. But I see no reason why the claims of the natural parents should be ignored’; (approved by Cumming–Bruce J In Re B (1976 ) Fam 161, 164)
25.
(1976 ) Fam 161
26.
(1977 ) 1 All E R 182
27.The Times 16 November 1976
28.op cit note 25 p185
29.op cit note 25 p186
30.op cit note 25 p192
31.op cit note 25 p191
32.op cit note 25 p192
33.op cit note 8 p163
34.The Times 25 November 1976