This study evaluated a reflective practice group designed to support foster carers and promote secure attachments with their foster children. Eight foster carers in South East England participated in the evaluation. A mixed-methods approach was employed: quantitative measures assessed reflective functioning, parental self-efficacy and parental stress pre- and post-intervention; qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with five participants and analysed using thematic analysis. Results indicated improvements in one domain of reflective functioning. Qualitative findings highlighted themes such as the group providing a safe and therapeutic space, enhanced emotional wellbeing, and strengthened carer–child relationships. Overall, participants found the group beneficial and appropriate. The evaluation suggests that reflective practice groups may positively impact foster carers’ reflective capacities and caregiving experiences. Further research with a larger sample is recommended to substantiate these findings.
Plain language summary
This study looked at foster carers’ experiences of participating in a group that aimed to provide them with support and help them build more positive relationships with the children they care for. Eight carers participated in the group and completed questionnaires to assess how well the group helps foster carers think about their own thoughts and feelings, feel confident in their parenting abilities and manage their stress levels. Five carers also discussed their experiences of the group in an interview. The results showed that the group helped carers feel better and understand their feelings more. They said it was a safe and helpful place where they could talk openly. This made them feel closer to the children they cared for and less stressed. Although the findings are promising, a larger study is required to understand the wider impact of the group. Overall, the group appeared to be a positive experience for foster carers.
AnisLPerezGBenziesKMEwashenCHartMLetourneauN (2020) Convergent validity of three measures of reflective function: Parent development interview, parental reflective function questionnaire, and reflective function questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology11: article no. 574719.
2.
BerryJOJonesWH (1995) The parental stress scale: Initial psychometric evidence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships12(3): 463–472.
3.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
4.
CookeDC (2015) Rasch Analysis of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: A critical examination of data from a non-clinical sample of mothers and fathers with a one-year-old child. Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University.
5.
CooleyMEThompsonHMNewellE (2019) Examining the influence of social support on the relationship between child behavior problems and foster parent satisfaction and challenges. Child & Youth Care Forum48: 289–303.
DeeringC (2024) Maximizing the effectiveness of psychoeducational groups. Journal of Counselor Practice15(1): 1–30.
8.
Department for Education (DfE) (2021) Children Looked After in England Including Adoptions. Available at: explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/children-looked-after-in-england-including-adoptions/2021
9.
FaulFErdfelderELangAGBuchnerA (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods39: 175 –191.
10.
FelittiVJAndaRFNordenbergDWilliamsonDFSpitzAMEdwardsVMarksJS (1998) Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine14(4): 245–258.
11.
FonagyPLuytenPMoulton-PerkinsAFearonPLowyckB (2016) Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: The reflective functioning questionnaire. PloS one11(7): e0158678.
12.
FordTVostanisPMeltzerHGoodmanR (2007) Psychiatric disorder among British children looked after by local authorities: Comparison with children living in private households. British Journal of Psychiatry190(4): 319–325.
13.
GoldingKPickenW (2004) Group work for foster carers caring for children with complex problems. Adoption & Fostering28(1): 25–37.
14.
GoldingKS (2013) Nurturing Attachments Training Resource. Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London.
15.
Gurney-SmithBGrangerCRandleAFletcherJ (2010) ‘In time and in tune’ – The Fostering Attachments group: Capturing sustained change in both caregiver and child. Adoption & Fostering34(4): 50–60.
HewittOGurney-SmithBGoldingK (2018) A qualitative exploration of the experiences of adoptive parents attending ‘Nurturing Attachments’, a dyadic developmental psychotherapy informed group. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry23(3): 471–482.
20.
Home for Good (2021) Statistics. Available at: homeforgood.org.uk/statistics
21.
HughesDABaylinJ (2012) Brain-Based Parenting: The neuroscience of caregiving for healthy attachment. London: W. W. Norton & Company.
22.
JosephMAO’ConnorTGBriskmanJAMaughanBScottS (2014) The formation of secure new attachments by children who were maltreated: An observational study of adolescents in foster care. Development and Psychopathology26(1): 67–80.
23.
JulianMMLawlerJMRosenblumKL (2017) Caregiver-child relationships in early childhood: Interventions to promote well-being and reduce risk for psychopathology. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports4(2): 87–98.
24.
KyonkaEG (2019) Tutorial: Small-N power analysis. Perspectives on Behavior Science42(1): 133–152.
25.
LaybourneGAndersenJSandsJ (2008) Fostering attachments in looked after children: Further insight into the group-based programme for foster carers. Adoption & Fostering32(4): 64–76.
26.
LiebermanMDEisenbergerNICrockettMJTomSMPfeiferJHWayBM (2007) Putting feelings into words. Psychological Science18(5): 421–428.
27.
LuytenPMayesLCNijssensLFonagyP (2017) The Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation. PloS One12(5): e0176218.
28.
MidgleyNAlayzaALawrenceHBellewR (2018) Adopting Minds – A mentalization-based therapy for families in a post-adoption support service: Preliminary evaluation and service user experience. Adoption & Fostering42(1): 22–37.
OttawayHSelwynJ (2016) ‘No-One Told Us It Was Going to Be Like This’: Compassion fatigue and foster carers. Bristol: University of Bristol/Fostering Attachments. Available at: research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/94738726/_No_one_told_us_it_was_going_to_be_like_this_Compassion_fatigue_and_foster_carers_final_report.pdf
32.
PasalichDSFlemingCBOxfordMLZhengYSpiekerSJ (2016) Can parenting intervention prevent cascading effects from placement instability to insecure attachment to externalizing problems in maltreated toddlers?. Child Maltreatment21(3): 175–185.
33.
RanzatoEAusterberryCBesserSJCirasolaAMidgleyN (2021) A qualitative analysis of goals set by foster carers seeking support for their child’s emotional well-being. Adoption & Fostering45(1): 7–21.
34.
RedfernSWoodSLassriDCirasolaAWestGAusterberryCLuytenPFonagyPMidgleyN (2018) The Reflective Fostering Programme: Background and development of a new approach. Adoption & Fostering42(3): 234–248.
35.
RutherfordHJGoldbergBLuytenPBridgettDJMayesLC (2013) Parental reflective functioning is associated with tolerance of infant distress but not general distress: Evidence for a specific relationship using a simulated baby paradigm. Infant Behavior and Development36(4): 635–641.
36.
SelwynJGoldingKAlperJGurney SmithBHewittO (2016) A Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of the Nurturing Attachments Group Programme. Newport Pagnell: Adoptionplus.
37.
SimkissD (2019) The needs of looked after children from an adverse childhood experience perspective. Paediatrics and Child Health29(1): 25–33.
38.
Social Care Institute for Excellence (2010) SCIE/NICE Recommendations on Looked After Children: Promoting the quality of life of looked-after children and young people [SCIE Guide 40].
39.
StainesJGoldingKSelwynJ (2019) Nurturing attachments parenting program: The relationship between adopters’ parental reflective functioning and perception of their children’s difficulties. Developmental Child Welfare1(2): 143–158.
40.
TorreJBLiebermanMD (2018) Putting feelings into words: Affect labelling as implicit emotion regulation. Emotion Review10(2): 116–124.
41.
WassallS (2011) Evaluation of an Attachment Theory Based Parenting Programme for Adoptive Parents and Foster Carers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham.
42.
WoolgarMBeckettCFalconerS, et al. (2013) A New, Brief Measure of Parental Efficacy for Parenting Practitioners. King's College, London: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/National Academy of Parenting Research.
