BakerDAWareJMSchweitzerNJRiskoEF (2017)
Making sense of research on the neuroimage bias.Public Understanding of Science26(2): 251–258. doi: 10.1177/0963662515604975
CecilCAVidingEFearonP, et al. (2017)
Disentangling the mental health impact of childhood abuse and neglect.Child Abuse & Neglect63: 106–119. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.11.024
5.
ChaffinM (2008)
Commentary on Buckner and implications for treatment selection among foster children with RAD.Child Maltreatment13(3): 313–314. doi: 10.1177/1077559508319384
6.
ChaffinMHansonRSaundersBE, et al. (2006)
Report of the APSAC task force on attachment therapy, reactive attachment disorder, and attachment problems. Child Maltreatment11(1): 76–89. doi: 10.1177/1077559505283699
7.
CoanJA (2016) Toward a new science of attachment. In: CassidyJShaver P (eds) Handbook of Attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 3rd edn.New York:
Guilford Press, pp. 242–269.
8.
EdwardsRGilliesVHorsleyN (2015)
Brain science and early years policy: hopeful ethos or ‘cruel optimism’?Critical Social Policy35(2): 167–187. doi: 10.1177/0261018315574020
9.
FinkelhorDOrmrodRKTurnerHA (2009)
Lifetime assessment of poly-victimization in a national sample of children and youth.Child Abuse & Neglect33(7): 403–411. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.012
10.
Kelly-IrvingMDelpierreC (2019)
A critique of the Adverse Childhood Experiences framework in epidemiology and public health: uses and misuses.Social Policy and Society18(3): 445–456. doi: 10.1017/s1474746419000101
11.
LauterbachDArmourC (2016)
Symptom trajectories among child survivors of maltreatment: findings from the Longitudinal Studies of Child Abuse and Neglect (LONGSCAN).Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology44(2): 369–379. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-9998-6
12.
Lloyd-JonesE (2013)
Decision-making within the child’s timescale: who decides?Family Law43: 1053–1055.
13.
McCroryEJVidingE (2015)
The theory of latent vulnerability: reconceptualizing the link between childhood maltreatment and psychiatric disorder.Developmental Psychopathology27(2): 493–505. doi: 10.1017/S0954579415000115
14.
NelsonCAFoxNAZeanahCH (2014) Romania’s Abandoned Children: Deprivation, brain development, and the struggle for recovery.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
15.
O’ConnorTGMarvinRSRutterM, et al. (2003)
Child‒parent attachment following early institutional deprivation. Development and Psychopathology15(1): 19–38. doi: 10.1017/s0954579403000026
16.
RoseHRoseS (2016) Can Neuroscience Change Our Minds?Cambridge:
Polity Press.
17.
RutterM (2007)
Proceeding from observed correlation to causal inference: the use of natural experiments.Perspectives on Psychological Science2(4): 377–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00050.x
18.
RutterMBeckettCCastleJ, et al. (2009) Policy and Practice Implications from the English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study: Forty five key questions.
London:
BAAF.
19.
ScharrerLRupieperYStadtlerMBrommeR (2017)
When science becomes too easy: science popularization inclines laypeople to underrate their dependence on experts.Public Understanding of Science26(8): 1003–1018. doi: 10.1177/0963662516680311
20.
ShonkoffJPBalesSN (2011)
Science does not speak for itself: translating child development research for the public and its policymakers.Child Development82(1): 17–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01538.x
21.
SteptoeAMarteauTFonagyPAbelK (2019)
ACEs: evidence, gaps, evaluation and future priorities.Social Policy and Society18(3): 415–424. doi: 10.1017/s1474746419000149
22.
StevensHELeckmanJFCoplanJDSuomiSJ (2009)
Risk and resilience: early manipulation of macaque social experience and persistent behavioral and neurophysiological outcomes.Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry48(2): 114–127. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318193064c
23.
SuomiSJ (2008) Attachment in rhesus monkeys. In: CassidyJShaverP (eds) Handbook of Attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 2nd edn.
New York:
Guilford Press, pp. 173–191.
24.
WardHBrownR (2013) ‘
Decision-making within a child’s timeframe’: a response.Family Law43: 1181–1186.
25.
WastellDWhiteS (2012)
Blinded by neuroscience: social policy, the family and the infant brain.Families, Relationships and Societies1(3): 397–414. doi: 10.1332/204674312X656301
26.
WastellDWhiteS (2017) Blinded by Science: Social implications of neuroscience and epigenetics.
Bristol:
Policy Press.
27.
WeissmanDGBitranDMillerAB, et al. (2019)
Difficulties with emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic mechanism linking child maltreatment with the emergence of psychopathology.Development and Psychopathology31(3): 899–915. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000348
WoolgarM (2013)
The practical implications of the emerging findings in the neurobiology of maltreatment for looked after and adopted children: recognising the diversity of outcomes.Adoption & Fostering37(3): 237–252.
30.
YeungAWGotoTKLeungWK (2017)
The changing landscape of neuroscience research, 2006‒2015: a bibliometric study.Frontiers in Neuroscience11: 120. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00120