Transracial adoptions by white parents are situated at the intersections of family and public policy. Debates on racial integration are juxtaposed with child rights and the private sphere of the family. In Britain, the practices of transracial adoption and ‘racial matching’ continue to invite fierce debate and discussion. Several factors, including the ongoing disproportionate representation of minority ethnic children in the public care system, the ‘unavailability’ of suitable minority ethnic adoptive parents, concerns about adoptees' racial/cultural identity and the ‘suitability’ of white parents to raise racially competent children, form the backdrop for such debates. For the last decade or so, political attention has been focused on permanence for children in care and adoption in particular. Within these wider debates, the allegedly low adoption rates of minority ethnic children, the ‘delay’ in finding suitable adoptive families, the ‘rejection’ of suitable white adoptive couples, and ‘ethnic matching’ are presented as some of the key concerns. Ravinder Barn and Derek Kirton seek to unravel the evidence base around transracial adoption and ‘racial matching’ in the symbolic representational battle being fought in the ‘best interests’ of minority ethnic children.
Adoption UK, Waiting to be Parents: Adopters' experiences of being recruited, Banbury: Adoption UK, 2011.
2.
AlexanderC, ‘Cohesive identities: the distance between meaning and understanding’, in WetherellMLaflecheMBerkeleyR (eds), Identity, Ethnicity and Community Cohesion, London: Sage, 2007.
3.
BagleyC, International and Transracial Adoptions: A mental health perspective, Aldershot: Avebury, 1993.
4.
BagleyCYoungL, ‘The identity, adjustment and achievement of transracially adopted children: a review and empirical report’, in VermaGBagleyC (eds), Race, Education and Identity, London: Macmillan, 1979.
5.
BarnR, Black Children in the Public Care System, London: Batsford, 1993.
6.
BarnR, ‘Race, ethnicity and transracial adoption’, in KatzITreacherA (eds), The Dynamics of Adoption, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2000.
7.
BarnR, ‘Interculturalism in Europe: fact, fad or fiction — The deconstruction of a theoretical idea’, in FarrarM (ed), Debating Multiculturalism 1, London: Dialogue Society, 2012.
8.
BarnR, ‘“Doing the right thing” - transracial adoption in the USA’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2013, forthcoming.
9.
BarnRSinclairRFerdinandD, Acting on Principle: An examination of race and ethnicity in social services provision to children and families, London: BAAF, 1997.
10.
BartholetE, ‘Where do black children belong?: the politics of race matching in adoption’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review139:5, pp 1163–256, 1991.
11.
BebbingtonACMilesJ, ‘The background of children who enter local authority care’, British Journal of Social Work19:5, pp 349–68, 1989.
12.
BiehalNEllisonSBakerCSinclairI, Belonging and Permanence: Outcomes in long-term foster care and adoption, London: BAAF, 2010.
13.
BrooksDBarthRBussiereAPattersonG, ‘Adoption and race: implementing the multiethnic placement act and the interethnic adoption provisions’, Social Work44:2, pp 167–78, 1999.
14.
Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI), Adoption: Messages from inspections of adoption agencies, London: CSCI, 2006.
15.
Consortium of Voluntary Adoption Agencies, The Contribution of Voluntary Adoption Agencies to Outcomes for Children: VAA Sector Performance Report, Chester: CVAA, 2011.
16.
DanceC, Focus on Adoption: A snapshot of adoption patterns, 1995, London: BAAF, 1997.
17.
DanceCOuwejanDBeechamJFarmerE, Linking and Matching: A survey of adoption agency practice in England and Wales, London: BAAF, 2010.
18.
Department for Education (DfE), Adoption Statutory Guidance: The Adoption and Children Act 2002, London: DfE, 2011b.
19.
Department for Education, Children Looked After by Local Authorities in England (including adoption and care leavers) - Year ending 31 March 2011, London: DfE, 2011a.
20.
Department for Education, Statistical First Release, Children looked after in England (including adoption and care leavers) year ending 31 March 2012, London: DfE, 2012a.
21.
Department for Education, An Action Plan for Adoption: Tackling Delay, London: DfE, 2012b.
22.
Department of Health (DH), Adoption: A new approach (Cm5017), London: DH, 2000.
23.
DivineD, ‘Defective, hypocritical and patronising research’, Caribbean Times, 4 March 1983.
24.
EspositoDBiaforaF, ‘Toward a sociology of adoption: historical deconstruction’, in JavierRBadenABiaforaFCamacho-GingerichA (eds), Handbook of Adoption: Implications for Researchers, Practitioners and Families, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.
25.
Evan B Donaldson Institute, Finding Families for African American Children: The role of race and law in adoption from foster care, New York: Evan B Donaldson Adoption Institute, 2008.
26.
FarmerEDanceC, An Investigation of Family Finding and Matching in Adoption - Briefing paper, London: Department for Education, 2010.
27.
FensterJ, ‘Transracial adoption in black and white: a survey of social worker attitudes’, Adoption Quarterly5:4, pp 33–58, 2002.
28.
FinneyNSimpsonL, ‘Sleepwalking to Segregation?’: Challenging myths about race and migration, Bristol: Policy Press, 2009.
29.
FitzherbertK, West Indian Children in London, London: Bell & Sons, 1967.
30.
FrazerLSelwynJ, ‘Why are we waiting? The demography of adoption for children of black, Asian and black mixed parentage in England’, Child & Family Social Work10:2, pp 135–47, 2005.
31.
GaileyC, Blue-ribbon Babies and Labors of Love: Race, class and gender in US adoption practice, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2010.
32.
GillOJacksonB, Adoption and Race: Black, Asian and mixed race children in white families, London: Batsford, 1983.
33.
GoldbergD, The Racial State, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002.
34.
HarrisP (ed), In Search of Belonging: Reflections by transracially adopted people, London: BAAF, 2006.
35.
Hawkins-LeonGBradleyC, ‘Race and transracial adoption: the answer is neither simply black or white nor right or wrong’, Catholic University Law Review51:4, pp 1227–86, 2002.
NareyM, ‘The Narey Report: a blueprint for the nation's lost children’, The Times, 5 July 2011.
47.
NCH, ‘The problem of the coloured child: the experience of the National Children's Home’, Child Care Quarterly8:2, 1954.
48.
Ofsted, Right on Time: Exploring delays in adoption, London: Ofsted, 2012.
49.
OwenCStathamJ, Disproportionality in Child Welfare: The prevalence of black and minority ethnic children within the ‘looked after’ and ‘children in need’ populations and on child protection registers in England, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2009.
50.
ParekhB, A New Politics of Identity: Political principles for an interdependent world, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
51.
PearceJ, Adoption UK statement on Ofsted Report, Adoption UK, 3 April 2012; www.adoptionuk.org.
52.
PembertonC, ‘Government to dismantle “bloated” adoption system’, Community Care, 23 February 2012.
53.
PIU (Performance and Innovation Unit), Prime Minister's Review of Adoption, Issued for Consultation, London: PIU, 2000.
54.
QuintonD, Rethinking Matching in Adoptions from Care, London: BAAF, 2012.
55.
QuirozP, ‘From race matching to transracial adoption: race and the changing discourse of US adoption’, Critical Discourse Studies5:3, pp 249–64, 2008.
56.
RattansiA, Racism: A very short introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
57.
RaynorL, Adoption of Non-White Children: The experience of a British adoption project, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1970.
58.
RidleyJWainwrightJ, ‘Black’ families for ‘black’ children? An evaluation of action for children's practice in ethnically matching black, Asian and dual heritage children for adoption, London: Action for Children, 2010.
59.
RoordaR, ‘Moving beyond the controversy of the transracial adoption of black and biracial Children’, in JavierRBadenABiaforaFCamacho-GingerichA (eds), Handbook of Adoption: Implications for researchers, practitioners and families, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.
60.
RoweJLambertL, Children who Wait, London: Association of British Adoption Agencies, 1973.
61.
RuleG, Recruiting Black and Minority Ethnic Adopters and Foster Carers, London: BAAF, 2006.
62.
RushtonAMinnisH, ‘Trans-racial family placements’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry38:2, pp 157–59, 1997.
63.
SavageM, ‘Find prospective adopters bigger homes, councils told’, The Times, 18 November 2011.
64.
SelwynJQuintonDHarrisPWijedasaDNawazSWoodM, Pathways to Permanence for Black, Asian and Mixed Ethnicity Children, London: BAAF, 2010.
65.
SmallJ, ‘The crisis in adoption’, Journal of Psychiatry30, pp 129–42, 1984.
66.
ThoburnJNorfordERashidS, Permanent Family Placement for Children of Minority Ethnic Origin, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2000.
67.
Times editorial, ‘Adopting common sense: bureaucratic barriers and prejudices have disgracefully forced down adoption rates. Children older than five now have little chance of being taken out of care’, The Times, 18 April 2011.
68.
TizardB, Adoption: A second chance, London: Open Books, 1977.
69.
VonkE, ‘Cultural competence for transracial adoptive parents’, Social Work46:3, pp 246–55, 2001.
