Peter Selman examines the recent history of intercountry adoption in Europe in the context of the enlarged EU, which contains both receiving and sending countries. The article provides a detailed analysis of the movement of children for adoption between European countries and examines the impact of intercountry adoption on the well-being of children in Europe and current debates in the European Parliament on the future of intercountry adoption in Europe.
AdamsG., ‘Adoption agencies warned off Haiti's orphans’, The Independent, 19 January 2010.
2.
AltsteinH.SimonJ., Intercountry Adoption: A multinational perspective, New York: Praeger, 1991.
3.
BeanP.MelvilleJ., Lost Children of the Empire, London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
4.
BrowneK., ‘A European survey of the number and characteristics of children less than three years old in residential care at risk of harm’, Adoption & Fostering29: 4, pp 23–33, 2005.
5.
CallinanR., ‘Stolen children’, Time Magazine, 21 August 2008.
ChouS.BrowneK., ‘The relationship between institutional care and the international adoption of children in Europe’, Adoption & Fostering32: 1, pp 40–8, 2008.
Defence for Children International, ROMANIA: The Adoption of Romanian Children by Foreigners, Geneva: DCI/ISS, 1991.
13.
De LucaP., ‘European Commission Study on Adoption’, Presentation at the Council of Europe conference, Challenges in Adoption Procedures in Europe, 2009; full report available at www.ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/whatsnew_en.htm.
14.
DickensJ., ‘The paradox of inter-country adoption: Analysing Romania's experience as a sending country’, International Journal of Social Welfare11: 2, pp 76–83, 2002.
15.
DickensJ., ‘The social policy contexts of intercountry adoption’, Paper presented at the second International Conference on Adoption Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 17–21 July 2006.
16.
DoddsP., Outer Search/Inner Journey: An orphan and adoptee's quest, Pyallup, Washington, DC: Aphrodite Publishing Company, 1997.
17.
FarinaL.LeiferM.ChasnoffI., ‘Attachment and behavioural difficulties in internationally adopted Russian children’, Adoption & Fostering28: 2, pp 38–49, 2004.
18.
FreidmutterC., ‘International adoptions: Problems and solutions’, Testimony before the House Committee on International Relations, 2 May 2002; available at www.adoptioninstitute.org/publications/.
19.
y BlascoP. GayMcRaeS.SelmanP.WardleH., ‘The relationship between institutional care and the international adoption of children in Europe: A rejoinder to Chou and Browne’, Adoption & Fostering32: 2, pp 63–8, 2008.
Hague Conference, Responses to Questionnaire on the Practical Operation of the Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Prel. Doc. No 1 of March 2005), The Hague: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2005; www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.publicationsdtid=33cid=69 (accessed 13 March 2009).
22.
Hague Conference, Status Table for the Convention of 29 May 1993 on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, The Hague: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2009; www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.status;cid=69 (accessed 13 March 2009).
23.
Hague Conference, Haiti Earthquake and Intercountry Adoption of Children, Information note to States and Central Authorities, The Hague: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2010.
24.
HalifaxJ., ‘Why are there so many international adoptions in France?’, Paper presented at the second International Conference on Adoption Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 17–21 July 2006.
25.
HaugaardJ.WojslawowiczJ.PalmerM., ‘International adoption: Children from Romania’, Adoption Quarterly3: 3, pp 73–83, 2000.
26.
HayesP., ‘Deterrents to intercountry adoption in Britain’, Family Relations49: 4, pp 465–71, 2000.
27.
HjernA.LindbladB.VinnerlungC., ‘Suicide, psychiatric illness and social maladjustment in intercountry adoptees in Sweden: A cohort study’, Lancet360, pp 443–48, 2002.
28.
HjernA.VinnerljungB.LindbaldF., ‘Avoidable mortality among child welfare recipients and intercountry adoptees; a national cohort study’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health58: 5, pp 412–17, 2004.
29.
HoksbergenR., Adopted Children at Home and School, Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1987.
30.
HoksbergenR., ‘Intercountry adoption coming of age in the Netherlands: Basic issues, trends and developments’, in AltsteinH.SimonR. (eds), Intercountry Adoption: A multinational perspective, New York: Praeger, 1991.
31.
HoksbergenR., ‘Changes in attitudes in three generations of adoptive parents’, in SelmanP. (ed), Intercountry Adoption: Development, trends and perspectives, London: BAAF, 2000.
32.
HoksbergenR.DijkumC.Van StoutjesdijkF., ‘Experiences of Dutch families who parent an adopted Romanian child’, Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics23: 6, pp 403–9, 2002.
33.
HorganR.MartinF., ‘The European Convention on Adoption: Progressing the children's rights polemic’, International Family Law, September, p 155, 2008.
34.
JufferF.Van IJzendoornM., ‘Behaviour problems and mental health referrals of international adoptees: A meta-analysis’, Journal of the American Medical Association293: 20, pp 2501–15, 2005.
35.
JufferF.Van IJzendoornM., ‘International adoption comes of age: Development of international adoptees from a longitudinal and meta-analytical perspective’, in WrobelG.NeillE. (eds), International Advances in Adoption Research, London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp 169–92, 2009.
36.
KaneS., ‘The movement of children for international adoption: An epidemiological perspective’, The Social Science Journal30: 4, pp 323–39, 1993.
LammerantI.HofstetterM., Adoption: At what cost? For an ethical responsibility of receiving countries in international adoption, Geneva: Terre des Hommes, 2008.
39.
MassonJ., ‘Intercountry adoption: A global problem or a global solution?’, Journal of International Affairs55: 1, pp 141–6, 2001.
40.
MoreauF., ‘Attendant enfants désespérément [Desperately waiting for children]’, Sud Ouest, 17 January 2008.
PostR., Romania — For Export Only: The untold story of the Romanian ‘orphans’, Netherlands: EuroComment Diffusion, 2007.
47.
PostR., ‘International adoption: Child protection or a breach of rights’, Conducive Magazine, August–Sept, 2009; www.conducivemag.com/index (accessed 5th March 2010).
48.
RollingsJ., Love Our Way, Sydney: Harper Collins, 2008.
49.
RorbechM., ‘The conditions of 18- to 25-year-old foreign-born adoptees in Denmark’, in AltsteinH.SimonR. (eds) Intercountry Adoption: A multinational perspective, New York: Praeger, 1991.
50.
RutterM.O'ConnorT.BeckettC.CastleJ.CroftC.DunnJ., ‘Recovery and deficit following profound early deprivation’, in SelmanP. (ed), Intercountry Adoption: Developments, trends and perspectives, London: BAAF, pp 107–25, 2000.
51.
RutterM.BeckettC.CastleJ.KreppnerJ.MehtaM.StevensS.BarkeE. Sonuga, Policy and Practice Implications from the English & Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study, London: BAAF, 2009.
52.
SaetersdalB.DalenM., ‘Norway: Intercountry adoptions in a homogeneous country’ inAltsteinH.SimonR. (eds), Intercountry Adoption: A multinational perspective, New York: Praeger, 1991.
53.
SaetersdalB.DalenM., ‘Identity formation in a homogeneous country: Norway’, in SelmanP. (ed), Intercountry Adoption: Developments, trends and perspectives, London: BAAF, 2000.
54.
SarriR.BaikY.BombykM., ‘Goal displacement and dependency in South Korean–United States intercountry adoption’, Children and Youth Services Review20, pp 87–114, 2002.
55.
Save the Children UK, Position Paper on International Adoption of Children from Bulgaria, London: Save the Children, 2003.
56.
SelmanP., ‘Intercountry adoption in Europe after the Hague Convention’, in SykesR.AlcockP. (eds), Developments in European Social Policy: Convergence and diversity, Bristol: Policy Press, 1998.
57.
SelmanP., ‘Intercountry adoption in the new millennium: The “quiet migration” revisited’, Population Research and Policy Review21: 3, pp 205–25, 2002.
58.
SelmanP., ‘Trends in intercountry adoption 1998–2004: A demographic analysis of data from 20 receiving states’, Journal of Population Research23: 2, pp 183–204, 2006.
59.
SelmanP., ‘From Bucharest to Beijing: Changes in countries sending children for international adoption 1990 to 2006’, in WrobelG.NeilE. (eds), International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice, London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009a.
60.
SelmanP., ‘Intercountry Adoption in Europe 1998–2007: Patterns, trends and issues’, in RummeryK.GreenerI.HoldenC. (eds), Social Policy Review 21: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, pp 133–165, Bristol: Policy Press, 2009b.
61.
SelmanP., ‘The rise and fall of intercountry adoption in the 21st century’, International Social Work52: 5, pp 575–94, 2009c.
62.
SelmanP., ‘Research into outcomes of intercountry adoption’, Community Care Inform, 2009d; www.ccinform.co.uk.
63.
SelmanP.MasonK., ‘Alternatives to adoption for looked after children’, AnnexC., in Adoption: Better choices for our children, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, 2005.
64.
SelmanP.MorettiE.BrogiF., ‘Statistical profile of international adoption in the European Union’, Chapter 1 in International adoption in the European Union, Final report to the European Parliament, 26 February 2009, Florence: Istituto degli Innocenti, 2009.
65.
SereniusM., ‘The silent cry: A Finnish child during World War II and 50 years later’, International Forum of Psychoanalysis4, pp 35–47, 1995.
66.
SmolinD., ‘Intercountry adoption as child trafficking’, Valparaiso Law Review39: 2, pp 281–325, 2004; available at www.works.bepress.com/david_smolin/3 (accessed 9 March 2010).
67.
SmolinD., ‘Child laundering as exploitation: Applying anti-trafficking norms to intercountry adoption under the coming Hague Regime’, ExpressO, 2007; available at www.works.bepress.com/david_smolin/4.
68.
TannockC., ‘European parliamentarians break the Nicholson monopoly on intercountry adoptions’, Bucharest Daily News, 8 March 2006; www.charlestannock.com/pressarticle.asp?ID=1190 (accessed 5 March 2010).
69.
TextorM., ‘International adoptions in West Germany: A private affair’, in AltsteinH.SimonR. (eds), Intercountry Adoption: A multinational perspective, New York: Praeger, 1991.
70.
The Italian, Russian film about an orphan due to be adopted in Italy who runs away to search for his mother, 2005; www.sonyclassics.com/theitalian/.
71.
TriseliotisJ., ‘Intercountry adoption; global trade or global gift?’, Adoption & Fostering24: 2, pp 45–54, 2000.
72.
UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund), ‘Intercountry adoption’, Innocenti Digest No 4, Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 1999.
73.
UNICEF, The State of the World's Children, New York: UNICEF, 2000–9.
Van IJzendoornM.JufferF., ‘The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 2006: Adoption as intervention: Meta-analytic evidence for massive catch-up and plasticity in physical, socio-emotional, and cognitive development’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry47: 12, pp 1228–45, 2006.
77.
VerhulstF., ‘The development of internationally adopted children’ inSelmanP. (ed), Intercountry Adoption: Developments, trends and perspectives, London: BAAF, pp 126–42, 2000.
78.
WeilR., ‘International adoptions: The quiet migration’, International Migration Review18: 2, pp 276–93, 1984.
79.
WestraH., Welcome to United Adoptees International, 2008; uai-org.blogspot.com/ (accessed 5 March 2010).
