The data reported in this article by Jesús Palacios and Jesús M Jiménez come from a study of foster care in Andalusia, southern Spain. In Andalusia, as in the rest of Spain, kinship care is far more frequent than non-relative foster care. The authors explore the differences between these two types of foster care arrangement in a number of areas: socio-demographic profiles; children's stimulation and patterns of rearing; stress, informal support and needs; formal support and relationships with child protection services; evaluation of the experiences of carers; contact between birth parents and children; and foster children's development and behavioural difficulties. Although, compared with non-relative care, there are some clear advantages to kinship foster care (eg placement at an early age and fewer transitions), there are also a number of risk factors in all areas studied that must be considered to avoid what should be a protective placement becoming a risk situation for both carers and children.
AldgateJMcIntoshM, Looking After the Family: A study of children looked after in Scotland, Edinburgh: Social Work Inspection Agency, 2006.
3.
BarreraMJr, ‘A method for the assessment of social support networks in community survey research’, Connections3, pp 8–13, 1980.
4.
BaumrindD, ‘Rearing competent children’, in DamonW (ed), Child Development Today and Tomorrow, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
5.
BernedoI, Adolescentes Acogidos por sus Abuelos: Relaciones familiares y problemas de conducta [Adolescents Cared for by their Grandparents: Family relationships and behaviour problems], Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Malaga, 2004.
6.
BrowneKHamilton-GiachritsisCJohnsonROstergrenM, ‘Overuse of institutional care for children in Europe’, British Medical Journal332, pp 485–87, 2006.
7.
CaldwellBBradleyR, Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment, University of Arkansas: College of Education, 1984.
8.
Centro Nazionale di Documentazione e Analisi per la l'Infanzia e l'Adolescenza, I Bambini e gli Adolescenti in Affidamento Familiare: Resegna tematica e riscontri empirici [Children and Adolescents in Foster Care: Thematic review and empirical comparisons], Florence: Istituto degli Innocenti, 2002.
CuddebackGS, ‘Kinship family foster care: a methodological and substantive synthesis of research’, Children and Youth Services Review26: 7, pp 623–39, 2004.
11.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES), Children Looked After at 31 March 2008, London: DfES, 2008.
12.
EhrleJGeenR, ‘Kin and non-kin foster care-findings from a national survey’, Children and Youth Services Review24, pp 15–35, 2002.
13.
FarmerEMoyersS, Foster Care: Fostering effective family and friends placements, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008.
14.
Fernández delValle JÁlvarez-BazEBravoA, ‘Acogimiento en familia extensa: perfil descriptivo y evaluación de necesidades en una muestra del Principado de Asturias’ [Kinship care: descriptive profile and needs assessment in an Asturian sample], Bienestar y Protección Infantil1, pp 33–56, 2002.
15.
Fernández delValle JBravoA, Situación Actual del Acogimiento de Menores en España [Current Situation of Foster Care in Spain], Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, 2004.
16.
GoodmanR, ‘The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry38, pp 581–86, 1997.
17.
GreshamFElliotS, Social Skills Rating System Manual, Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1990.
18.
HuntJWaterhouseSLutmanE, Keeping Them in the Family: Outcomes for children placed in kinship care through care proceedings, London: BAAF, 2008.
19.
IMSERSO, Informe 2006: Las personas mayores en España [2006 Report: Elderly people in Spain], Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, 2006.
20.
JiménezJMEspinosaM, Situación Actual del Acogimiento en Familia Extensa en la Provincia de Sevilla [Current Situation of Kinship Care in the Province of Seville], Unpublished technical report, University of Seville, 2007.
21.
JiménezJMMuñozAEspinosaMLeónE, ‘Kinship foster care: risk factors and support needs in a Spanish sample’, Paper presented at the 13th European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Jena, Germany, 21–25 August, 2007.
22.
JiménezJMPalaciosJ, Acogimiento Familiar en Andalucía: Procesos familiares, perfiles personales [Foster Care in Andalusia: Family processes, personal profiles], Granada: Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social, Junta de Andalucía, 2008.
23.
KaufmanASKaufmanNL, Manual for the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1990.
24.
MaccobyEEMartinJA, ‘Socialization in the context of the family: parent—child interaction’, in HetheringtonJ S (ed), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol 4, Socialization, personality, and social development, New York: Wiley, 1983.
25.
MaguraSMosesB, The Child Well-Being Scales, Annapolis Junction, MD: Child Welfare League of America (CWLA), 1986.
26.
Ministry of Work and Social Affairs, Estadística Básica de Protección a la Infancia [Child Protection Basic Statistics], Madrid: MTAS, 2007.
27.
MoleroRMoralMAlbiñanaPGimenoA, El Acogimiento en Familia Extens: Un estudio del perfil y las necesidades [Kinship Care: A study of profile and needs], Valencia: Ajuntament de Valencia, 2006.
28.
MontserratC, Niños, Niñas y Adolescentes Acogidos por sus Familiares: Qué sabemos, qué conocemos? [Boys, Girls and Adolescents Fostered by Relatives: What do we know? What do we learn?], Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament d'Acció Social i Ciudadanía, 2008.
RobinsonCMandlecoBOlsenSHartC, ‘The Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSQD)’, in PerlmutterBFTouliatosTHoldenG W (eds), Handbook of Family Measurement Techniques: Vol 3, Instruments and index, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
31.
SherasPAbidinRKonoldT, Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) Professional Manual, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1998.
