Policy and practice developments need to be based on firm evidence about how well kinship care (that is, placements with relatives or friends) works and the services required to maintain these placements. The research reported by Elaine Farmer was based on case file reviews of 270 children, half in kin placements and half in non-kin foster care, and on interviews with a subsample of 32 kin carers, social workers, children and parents. The study found that while the children were remarkably similar in the two kinds of placement, kin carers, in contrast, were significantly more disadvantaged than stranger foster carers. They also faced more hostility from birth parents during contact. The children's outcomes in terms of placement quality and disruption in the two settings were also very similar. However, because kin carers persisted with very challenging children and yet received fewer services than stranger foster carers, they were more often under strain. This article compares the characteristics of carers and children in the two kinds of placement and examines the impact of the children on the kin carers and the strains they experienced. It also considers the services received and needed by kin carers and children. The implications for policy and practice are examined.
AldgateJMcIntoshM, Looking After the Family: A study of children looked after in kinship care in Scotland, Edinburgh: Social Work Inspection Agency, 2006.
2.
BeemanSKimHBullerdickS, ‘Factors affecting placement of children in kinship and non-kinship foster care’, Children and Youth Services Review22: 1, pp 37–54, 2000.
3.
BroadB, ‘Kinship care: enabling and supporting child placements with kin’, in BAAF (ed), Assessment, Preparation and Support: Messages from research, London: BAAF, 1999.
4.
BroadB (ed), Kinship Care: The placement choice for children and young people, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing, 2001.
5.
BroadBSkinnerA, Relative Benefits: Placing children in kinship care, London: BAAF, 2005.
6.
BroadBHayesRRushforthC, Kith and Kin: Kinship care for vulnerable young people, London: National Children's Bureau, 2001.
7.
BurnetteD, ‘Social relationships of Latino grandparent caregivers: a role theory perspective’, The Gerontologist39: 1, pp 49–58, 1999.
8.
ChipunguSEverettJ, Children Placed in Foster Care with Relatives: A multi-state study, United States: Department of Health and Human Services, 1998.
9.
CrumbleyJLittleR L (eds), Relatives Raising Children: An overview of kinship care, Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America (CWLA), 1997.
10.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES), Care Matters: Time for change, Cm. 7137, Secretary of State for Education and Skills, June 2007.
11.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES), Statistics for Education: First Release, Children looked after by local authorities in England, Year Ending 31 March 2008, London: DfES, 2008.
12.
Department of Health (DH), Children in Care of Local Authorities, 31 March 1989, England, London: DH, 1991.
13.
Department of Health (DH), The Integrated Children's System, Exemplars, 2003.
14.
DoolanMNixonPLawrenceP, Growing Up in the Care of Relatives or Friends: Delivering best practice for children in family and friends care, London: Family Rights Group, 2004.
15.
DubowitzHFeigelmanSZuravinS, ‘A profile of kinship care’, Child Welfare72, pp 153–69, 1993.
16.
FarmerE, ‘What factors relate to good placement outcomes in kinship care?’, British Journal of Social Work; doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp 007, 2009a.
17.
FarmerE, ‘How do placements in kinship care compare with those in non-kin foster care: placement patterns, progress and outcomes?’, Child & Family Social Work14: 3, pp 331–42, 2009b.
18.
FarmerEParkerR, Trials and Tribulations: Returning children from care to their families, London: HMSO, 1991.
19.
FarmerEOwenM, Child Protection Practice: Private risks and public remedies, London: HMSO, 1995.
FarmerEMoyersS, Kinship Care: Fostering effective family and friends placements, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008.
22.
FLR (2002) Case Reference R (L and others)v Manchester City Council; R (R and another) v Manchester City Council IFLR43.
23.
FlynnR, ‘Training materials for kinship foster care’, in BroadB (ed), Kinship Care: The placement choice for children and young people, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing, 2001.
24.
FlynnR, ‘Kinship Care: Research review’, Child & Family Social Work7: 4, pp 311–21, 2002.
25.
Fuller-ThompsonEMinklerMDriverD, ‘A profile of grandparents raising grandchildren in the United States’, The Gerontologist37: 3, pp 406–11, 1997.
26.
GreefR (ed), Fostering Kinship: An international perspective on kinship care, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999.
27.
Grogan-KaylorA, ‘Who goes into kinship care? The relationship of child and family characteristics to placement into kinship foster care’, Social Work Research24: 3, pp 132–41, 2000.
28.
HegarRScannapiecoM (eds), Kinship Foster Care: Policy, practice and research, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
29.
HuntJWaterhouseSLutmanE, Keeping Them in the Family: Outcomes for abused and neglected children placed with family or friends carers through care proceedings, London: BAAF, 2008.
30.
IglehartA, ‘Kinship foster care: placement, service and outcome issues’, Social Service Review16: 1–2, pp 107–22, 1994.
31.
MinklerMRoeKMPriceM, ‘The physical and emotional health of grandmothers raising grandchildren in the crack cocaine epidemic’, The Gerontologist32: 6, pp 752–61, 1992.
32.
MinklerMFuller-ThompsonEMillerDDriverD, ‘Grandparent caregiving and depression’, in HayslipBGoldberg GlenR (eds), Grandparents Raising Grandchildren, New York: Springer Publishing, 2000.
33.
National Foster Care Association (NFCA), Family and Friends Carers: Social Workers' Training Guide, London: NFCA, 2000a.
34.
National Foster Care Association (NFCA), Family and Friends Carers' Handbook, London: NFCA, 2000b.
35.
O'BrienV, ‘Relative care: a different type of foster care — implications for practice’, in KellyGGilliganR (eds), Issues in Foster Care: Policy, practice and research, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2000.
36.
O'BrienV, ‘Contributions from an Irish study: understanding and managing relative care’, in BroadB (ed), Kinship Care: The placement choice for children and young people, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing, 2001.
37.
OostermanMSchuengelCSlotNBullensRDoreleijersT, ‘Disruptions in foster care: a review and meta-analysis’, Children and Youth Services Review29: 1, pp 53–76, 2007.
38.
PitcherD, When Grandparents Care, Plymouth: Plymouth City Council Social Services Department, 1999.
39.
PitcherD, ‘Placement with grandparents: the issues for grandparents who care for their grandchildren’, Adoption & Fostering26: 1, pp 6–14, 2002.
40.
RichardsA, Second Time Around: A survey of grandparents raising their grandchildren, London: Family Rights Group, 2001.
41.
ShahSArgentH, Life Story Work: What it is and what it means, London: BAAF, 2006.
SinclairIGibbsIWilsonK, Foster Placements: Why they succeed and why they fail, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2004.
44.
SinclairIBakerCLeeJGibbsI, The Pursuit of Permanence: A study of the English child care system, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2007.
45.
StogdonJ, ‘Report to the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust: an account of my journey to the United States of America to explore the role of grandparents and kinship care’, Unpublished, 1999.
46.
StrawbridgeWJWallhagenMIShemaSJKaplanGA, ‘New burdens or more of the same? Comparing grandparent, spouse and adult child caregivers’, The Gerontologist37: 4, pp 505–10, 1997.
47.
SykesJSinclairIGibbsIWilsonK, ‘Kinship and stranger foster carers: How do they compare?’, Adoption & Fostering26: 2, pp 38–48, 2002.
48.
TapsfieldR, ‘Kinship care: a Family Rights Group perspective’, in BroadB (ed), Kinship Care: The placement choice for children and young people, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing, 2001.
49.
WaldmanJWhealA, ‘Training needs of friends and families who are foster carers’, in GreefR (ed), Fostering Kinship, Aldershot: Ashgate Arena, 1999.
50.
WhealA, ‘Family and friends who are carers: a framework for success’, BroadB (ed), op cit, 2001.
