Dolores Davey and Andrew Pithouse outline the findings from a longitudinal case study which ran from 2002 to 2006 and explored the educational achievement of all the young people looked after (in foster and residential care) in one local authority in South Wales. Among this group were 14 young people at a point one year before taking their Standard Attainment Tests (SATS), which are applied universally in UK schools. They were then followed up to the age at which they could complete any General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) exams. Hence, the young people's school history was tracked from the beginning of school Year 9 (sample age 13 years), at the end of which they took their SATS, through to the end of school Year 11 (sample age 15 years), at which point GCSEs are normally taken. This article focuses mainly on the outcome of the SATS and the looked after arrangements of the 14 young people in the year leading to these important tests. The authors' concluding comments refer briefly to their Year 11 outcomes in order to indicate continuities and changes in attainment.
The SATs results are presented in a context of school attendance, the type and stability of care placements and education moves. Associations between schooling and separation are explored using an analysis of trajectories and outcomes that reveal how and why some young people clearly achieve while others do not. In doing so, the article seeks to add to studies and policy pronouncements in this field that too often represent looked after children by their collective statistical failure rather than by notable differences in educational outcomes and related circumstances.
BallCMcDonaldA, Law for Social Workers (fourth edition), Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.
2.
Barnardo's, Failed by the System: The views of young care leavers on their educational experiences [online] 2005, www.barnardos.org.uk/resources; accessed 1 September 2006.
3.
BerridgeD, āQuality Protects Research Briefing, No 2: The importance of stabilityā, in Stability in Foster Care, Papers from a seminar funded by the Nuffield Foundation and organised by members of the Centre for Research on the Child and Family, University of East Anglia, 2003.
4.
BerridgeD, āTheory and explanation in child welfare: education and looked after childrenā, Child & Family Social Work12: 1, pp 1ā10, 2007.
5.
BlythEMilnerJ, Social Work with Children: The educational perspective, London: Longman, 1997.
6.
BorlandM, āEducation for children in residential and foster careā, Research in Education63, pp 1ā4, 1998.
7.
BrayneHBroadbentG, Legal Materials for Social Workers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
8.
BrodieI, Children's Homes and School Exclusions: Redefining the problem, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2001.
9.
CameronC, āEducation and self-reliance among care leaversā, Adoption & Fostering31: 1, Special Issue: Education, pp 39ā49, 2007.
10.
CloughRBullockRWardAColtonMPithouseARobertsSWardH, Review of the Purpose and Future Shape of Fostering and Residential Care Services for Children and Young People in Wales: What works in practice ā a review of research evidence, Cardiff: Child and Family Division, Welsh Assembly Government, 2004.
11.
CoffeyA, Education and Social Change, Buckingham: Open University, 2001.
12.
ColtonMSandersRWilliamsM, An Introduction to Working with Children: A guide for social workers, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
13.
CreeVKayHTisdallK, āResearch with children: sharing the dilemmasā, Child & Family Social Work7: 1, pp 47ā56, 2002.
14.
CrottyM, The Foundation of Social Research: Meaning and perspective in the research process, London: Sage Publications, 1998.
15.
DaveyD, Achievement and Outcomes in Education: A case study of the experiences of young people looked after in residential and foster care in South Wales, PhD, Cardiff University, 2006.
16.
DenscombeM, Ground Rules for Good Research: A ten-point guide for social researchers, Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
17.
DenzinNLincolnY, āEntering the field of qualitative researchā, in DenzinNLincolnY (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, London: Sage Publications, 1994.
18.
Department for Education and Employment, Social Inclusion: Pupil support ā guidance on pupil attendance, behaviour, exclusion and reintegration, Circular 10/99, 1999.
19.
Department of Health, Guidance on the Education of Children and Young People in Public Care, London: HMSO, 2000.
20.
EssenJLambertLHeadJ, āSchool attainment of children who have been in careā, Child Care Health and Development2, pp 339ā51, 1976.
21.
FrancisJ, āInvesting in children's futures: enhancing the educational arrangements of looked after children and young peopleā, Child & Family Social Work5: 1, pp 23ā33, 2000.
22.
GilliganR, āEnhancing the resilience of children and young people in public care by mentoring their talents and interestsā, Child & Family Social Work4: 3, pp 187ā96, 1999.
23.
GlaserBStaussA, Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
24.
GorardS, āOne of us cannot be wrong: the paradox of achievement gapsā, British Journal of Sociology of Education21: 3, pp 391ā400, 2000.
25.
GorardS, Quantitative Methods in Social Science Research, London: Continuum, 2003.
26.
GorardSSmithE, What is Underachievement at School?, Working Paper Series 34, Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences, 2003.
27.
HarrisARansonS, āThe contradictions of education policy: disadvantage and achievementā, British Educational Research Journal31: 5, pp 571ā87, 2005.
28.
HarkerRDobel-OberDBerridgeDSinclairR, Taking Care of Education: An evaluation of the education of looked after children, London: National Children's Bureau, 2004.
29.
HaydenCGoddardJGorinSVan der SpekN, State Child Care, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1999.
30.
HeathAColtonMAldgateJ, āFailure to escape: a longitudinal study of foster children's educational attainmentā, British Journal of Social Work24: 3, pp 241ā60, 1994.
31.
HepinstallE, āGaining access to looked after children for research purposes: lessons learnedā, British Journal of Social Work30, pp 867ā72, 2000.
32.
HibbertH, Education Matters for Everyone Working with Children in Public Care, London: Who Cares? Trust, 2003.
33.
JacksonS, āPromoting stability and continuity in care away from homeā, in McNeishTNewmanTRobertsH (eds), What Works for Children?, Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
34.
JacksonSAjayiS, āFoster care and higher educationā, Adoption & Fostering31: 1, Special Issue: Education, pp 62ā72, 2007.
JacksonSSimonA, āThe costs and benefits of educating children in careā, in ChaseESimonAJacksonS (eds), In Care and After: A positive perspective, Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.
37.
JacksonSThomasN, What Works in Creating Stability for Looked After Children?, Barkingside: Barnardo's, 2000.
38.
MallonJ, āReturning to education after care: protective factors in the development of resilienceā, Adoption & Fostering31: 1, Special Issue: Education, pp 106ā17, 2007.
39.
MorrowVRichardsM, āThe ethics of social research with children: an overviewā, Children & Society10, pp 90ā105, 1996.
40.
National Assembly for Wales, Guidance on the Education of Children Looked After by Local Authorities, Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales, 2001a.
41.
National Assembly for Wales, How is your Child Doing in Secondary School?, Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales, 2001b.
42.
NCH, Close the Gap for Children in Care, London: NCH, 2005.
43.
O'SullivanAWestermanR, āClosing the gap: investigating the barriers to educational achievement for looked after childrenā, Adoption & Fostering31: 1, Special Issue: Education, pp 13ā20, 2007.
44.
PackmanJ, Who Needs Care? Social work decisions about children, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
45.
PadgettD K, Qualitative Methods in Social Work, London: Sage Publications, 1998.
46.
PartonNO'ByrneP, Constructive Social Work: Towards a new practice, London: Macmillan, 2000.
47.
RoyP, āEducational underachievement in looked after children: possible causes and consequencesā, in YuleWScottS (eds), Fostering, Adoption and Alternative Care, Occasional Paper No 6, London: Asscociation for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2007.
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU), Truancy and School Exclusion, London: SEU, 1998.
50.
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU), A Better Education for Children in Care, London: SEU, 2003.
51.
Social Services Inspectorate/OFSTED, The Education of Children who are Looked After by Local Authorities, London: HMSO, 1995.
52.
StadlerC, āDon't we deserve a decent education?ā, Adoption & Fostering31: 1, Special Issue: Education, pp 11ā13, 2007.
53.
Stainton-RogersW, āConstructing childhood, constructing child concernā, in FoleyPRocheJTuckerS (eds), Children in Society: Contemporary theory, policy and practice, Milton Keynes: Open University, 2001.
54.
SteinM, āLeaving care, education and career trajectoriesā, Oxford Review of Education20: 3, pp 348ā60, 1994.
55.
ThomasNO'KaneC, āEthics of participatory research with childrenā, Children & Society12, pp 336ā48, 1998.
