Discussions about provision for children in the care of the state have continually raised the question, can the corporate state parent? Roger Bullock, Mark E Courtney, Roy Parker, Ian Sinclair and June Thoburn consider the question in the light of recent studies of separated children. It is argued that while the state does not need to fulfil all parenting responsibilities when care is shared with families or children are adopted, for three groups of children parenting issues are especially salient. They are: children in kinship care, in long-term foster family care and young people who are seriously troubled and troublesome. Research that would produce relevant information and recommendations to improve the state's parenting is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldgateJBradleyM, Supporting Families through Short-term Fostering, London: The Stationery Office, 1999.
2.
AnderssonG, ‘Family relations, adjustment and well-being in a longitudinal study of children in care’, Child & Family Social Work10:1, pp 43–5, 2005.
3.
AxfordNBerryVLittleMMorpethL, Forty Years of Research, Policy and Practice in Children's Services, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
4.
BarberJDelfabbroP, ‘Children's adjustment to long-term foster care’, Children and Youth Services Review27, pp 329–40, 2005.
5.
BeekMSchofieldG, Providing a Secure Base in Long-term Foster Care, London: BAAF, 2004.
6.
BerridgeD, Foster Care: A research review, London: The Stationery Office, 1997.
BowlbyJ, Maternal Care and Mental Health, Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1951.
9.
BowlbyJ, Child Care and the Growth of Love, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1953.
10.
BullockRGoochDLittleM, Children Going Home: The reunification of families, Aldershot: Gower, 1998.
11.
BullockRLittleMMillhamS, Secure Treatment Outcomes: The care careers of very difficult adolescents, Aldershot: Gower, 1998.
12.
ChaseESimonAJacksonS, (eds), In Care and After: A positive perspective, London: Routledge, 2006.
13.
CourtneyM, ‘Research needed to improve the prospects for children in out-of-home placements’, Children and Youth Services Review22, pp 743–61, 2000.
14.
CourtneyMDworskyARuthGKellerTHavlicekJBostN, Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at age 19, Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago, 2005.
15.
CretneyS, The State as Parent: The Children Act 1948 in retrospect, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1998.
16.
DumaretACoppel-BatschMCouraudS, ‘Adult outcomes of children reared for long-term periods in foster families’, Child Abuse and Neglect21:10, pp 911–27, 1997.
17.
HarwinJOwenMLockeRForresterD, Making Care Orders Work: A study of care plans and their implementation, London: The Stationery Office, 2001.
18.
HMSO, Report of the Care of Children Committee, Cmnd 6922, London: HMSO, 1946.
19.
LamingH, The Victoria Climbié Inquiry, Cmnd 5730, London: The Stationery Office, 2003.
20.
LittleM, ‘Time for a change: a review of Fostering Now and other programmes of research on children in need’, Adoption & Fostering29:4, pp 9–22, 2005.
21.
LittleMKellyS, A Life without Problems: The achievements of a therapeutic community, Aldershot: Arena, 1995.
22.
LoweNMurchM, The Plan for the Child: Adoption or long-term fostering, London: BAAF, 2002.
23.
PackmanJHallC, From Care to Accommodation: Support, protection and control in child care services, London: The Stationery Office, 1998.
24.
ParkerR, Decisions in Child Care, London: Allen & Unwin, 1966.
25.
ParkerR, Caring for Separated Children, London: Macmillan, 1980.
26.
ParkerR, Adoption Now: Messages from research, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
27.
PughGDe'AthESmithC, Confident Parents, Confident Children: Policy and practice in parent education and support, London: National Children's Bureau, 1994.
28.
QuintonD, Supporting Parents: Messages from research, London: Jessica Kingsley, 2004.
29.
RoweJLambertL, Children who Wait, London: Association of British Adoption Agencies, 1973.
SchofieldGThoburnJHowellDDickensJ (forthcoming), ‘The search for stability and permanence: modelling the pathways of long-stay looked after children’, British Journal of Social Work, advance access published online, 15 August 2005.
32.
SchorrA, ‘The bleak prospect for public child welfare’, Social Service Review74:1, pp 124–38, 2000.
33.
SellickCThoburnJ, What Works in Family Placement, Barkingside: Barnardo's, 1996.
34.
SelwynJSturgessWQuintonDBaxterC, Costs and Outcomes of non-Infant Adoptions, Bristol University: Hadley Centre for Adoption and Foster Care Studies, 2003.
35.
SinclairI, Fostering Now: Messages from research, London: Jessica Kingsley, 2005.
36.
SinclairIWilsonKGibbsI, Foster Carers: Why they stay and why they leave, London: Jessica Kingsley, 2004.
37.
SinclairIBakerCWilsonKGibbsI, Foster Children: Where they go and how they get on, London: Jessica Kingsley, 2005.
38.
SinclairIWilsonKGibbsI, Foster Placements: Why they succeed and why they fail, London: Jessica Kingsley, 2005.
39.
SteinT JGambrillE D, ‘Facilitating decision making in foster care: the Alameda Project’, Social Service Review51, pp 502–13, 1977.
40.
ThoburnJ, Success and Failure in Permanent Family Placement, Aldershot: Avebury, 1990.
41.
ThoburnJ, ‘The risks and rewards of adoption for children in the public care’, Child and Family Law Quarterly15, pp 391–402, 2003.
42.
ThoburnJ, ‘Stability through adoption for children in care: some messages from research’, in AxfordN (eds) Forty Years of Research, Policy and Practice in Children's Services, op cit, pp 81–92, 2005.
43.
TitmussR, contribution to History of the Second World War, London: HMSO, 1976.
44.
TraslerG, In Place of Parents, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960.
45.
WilsonKSinclairITaylorCPithouseASellickC, Fostering Success: An exploration of the research literature on foster care, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2004.
