Until recently, educational issues for looked after children have been a largely neglected area of research. The current study by Amber Elliott aimed to investigate one factor that may contribute to the under-achievement of children in care. A group of high school teachers were selected to participate in the study to examine whether there were differences in teacher expectations of looked after children and their peers, as measured on seven educational factors. Participants were divided randomly into two groups and given one of two questionnaires. One asked about children with whom the teacher generally had contact, the other asked specifically about looked after children. There was found to be a significant difference in teacher expectations on questions measuring the likelihood of handing in homework consistently and the propensity to be the victim of bullying. Teachers did not have significantly different expectations of looked after children and non-looked after children on three other measures of behaviour: academic performance, attendance and being the perpetrator of bullying behaviour.
BlythE., ‘Keeping looked after young people in mainstream education’, in JacksonS. (ed), Nobody Ever Told Us School Mattered, London: BAAF, 2001.
2.
ChaikinA.SiglerE.DerlegaV., ‘Non-verbal mediators of teacher expectancy effect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology30:1, pp 144–49, 1974.
3.
CarterD. Clark, Doing Quantitative Psychological Research: From design to report, Hove: Psychology Press, 1997.
4.
CooperH. M.TomH., ‘Teacher expectation research: A review with implications for classroom instruction’, The Elementary School Journal85:1, pp 76–89, 1984.
5.
Department for Education and Employment and Department of Health, Draft Guidance on the Education of Children Looked After By Local Authorities, London: DfEE, 1999.
6.
EssenJ.LambertL.HeadJ., ‘Variations in behaviour ratings of children who have been in care’, Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry18, pp 335–46, 1977.
7.
FirthH.FletcherB., ‘Developing equal chances: A whole authority approach’, in JacksonS. (ed), Nobody Ever Told Us School Mattered, London: BAAF, 2001.
8.
CampbellF. Fletcher, The Education of Children who are Looked After, Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research, 1997.
9.
CampbellF. Fletcher, ‘Current trends and educational initiatives: what value have they for looked after young people?’, in JacksonS. (ed), see below.
10.
GoodT.BrophyJ., Educational Psychology: A realistic approach, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1977.
11.
HeathA.ColtonM.AldgateJ. (1994), ‘Failure to escape: a longitudinal study of foster children's educational attainment’, reprinted in JacksonS. (ed), see below.
12.
JacksonS. (ed), Nobody Ever Told Us School Mattered, London: BAAF, 2001.
13.
MatthewsG. P., ‘An example of the teacher expectation effect in mixed ability teaching’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching19:6, pp 497–502, 1982.
14.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL., Pygmalion in the Classroom, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.
SteinM., ‘Leaving care, education and career trajectories’ (1994), cited in Blyth E, ‘Keeping looked after young people in mainstream education’, in Jackson S (ed), as above.
