In recent years, scholars have taken interest in the significant remittance contributions of Filipinos living and working abroad to what some have called the Philippine ‘real estate boom’. In the case of real estate property as investment, however, much remains unknown with regards to how major Philippine real estate developers capture, facilitate and ensure the continuous flow of migrant investments into condominium units in the Philippines. This article examines how Philippine real estate developers make use of a particular kind of sales labour to reach various Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) populations. It argues that most major developers rely on a hierarchical, networked and transnationalized labour arrangement, composed mainly of licensed and unlicensed sales agents. Drawing from interviews with sales agents working in and between the cities of Metro Manila and Dubai, it then complicates dominant depictions of real estate sales agents by demonstrating the precarious conditions they work under as well as how this flexible labour arrangement often works in two ways. First, this article demonstrates that through their sales labour, specific Filipino migrant community dynamics such as community leadership, charity and other migrant ‘life projects’ such as investments, side hustles and debt get absorbed into the very circuitry of real estate accumulation. Second, through sales agents’ recruitment of OFW ‘marketing partners’, Philippine real estate developers are able to enter and expand into spaces of migrant advocacy and of migrant in/formal work to enrol OFWs either as potential investors, as labour or both.
AulakhPSKellyPF (2020) Introduction: Conceptualizing labour and capital mobilities in and out of Asia. In: KellyPFAulakhPS (eds) Mobilities of Labour and Capital in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–28.
3.
BoccagniP (2020) So many houses, as many homes? Transnational housing, migration, and development. In: BastiaTSkeldonR (eds) Routledge Handbook of Migration and Development. London: Routledge, pp.251–260.
BosePS (2014) Living the way the world does: Global Indians in the remaking of Kolkata. Annals of the Association of American Geographers104(2): 391–400.
7.
CahnPS (2008) Consuming class: Multilevel marketers in neoliberal Mexico. Cultural Anthropology23(3): 429–452.
8.
CardenasK (2020) The mobility-oligopoly nexus in Philippine property development. In: AulakhPSKellyPF (eds) Mobilities of Labour and Capital in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.233–261.
9.
CookIM (2015) Link work: Land and housing brokers in Mangaluru, India. Journal of South Asian Development10(3): 292–317.
10.
CrossJ (2019) Selling with prejudice: Social enterprise and caste at the bottom of the pyramid in India. Ethnos84(3): 458–479.
11.
CrossJStreetA (2009) Anthropology at the bottom of the pyramid. Anthropology Today25(4): 4–9.
12.
DeVerteuilGManleyD (2017) Overseas investment into London: Imprint, impact and pied-à-terre urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(6): 1308–1323.
DolanCRajakD (2018) Speculative futures at the bottom of the pyramid. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute24(2): 233–255.
15.
ElyacharJ (2012) Next practices: Knowledge, infrastructure, and public goods at the bottom of the pyramid. Public Culture24(1): 109–129.
16.
EwersMCDicceR (2016) Expatriate labour markets in rapidly globalising cities: Reproducing the migrant division of labour in Abu Dhabi and Dubai. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(15): 2448–2467.
17.
FauveaudG (2020) The new frontiers of housing financialization in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: The condominium boom and the foreignization of housing markets in the Global South. Housing Policy Debate30(4): 661–679.
18.
FosterCHeeksR (2013) Innovation and scaling of ICT for the bottom-of-the-pyramid. Journal of Information Technology28(4): 296–315.
19.
HardonADavatosIABLascoG (2019) Be your product. American Ethnologist46(4): 429–443.
20.
HosodaN (2013) Kababayan solidarity? Filipino communities and class relations in United Arab Emirates cities. Journal of Arabian Studies3(1): 18–35.
21.
HosodaN (2015) 2008: “Open City” and a new wave of Filipino migration to the Middle East. In: TagliacozzoESiuHFPerduePC (eds) Asia Inside Out. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press, pp.281–303.
22.
HosodaN (2016) Middle class Filipinos and the formation of diasporic national communities in the United Arab Emirates. In: LianKFRahmanMMbin AlasY (eds) International Migration in Southeast Asia (Asia in Transition). Singapore: Springer, pp.39–56.
23.
HuangJQ (2017) The ambiguous figures of social enterprise: Gendered flexibility and relational work among the iAgents of Bangladesh. American Ethnologist44(4): 603–616.
24.
KleibertJMKippersL (2016) Living the good life? The rise of urban mixed-use enclaves in Metro Manila. Urban Geography37(3): 373–395.
25.
KohSY (2022) The interurban migration industry: ‘Migration products’ and the materialisation of urban speculation at Iskandar Malaysia. Urban Studies59: 2199–2216.
26.
KrijnenMBassensDVan MeeterenM (2017) Manning circuits of value: Lebanese professionals and expatriate world-city formation in Beirut. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(12): 2878–2896.
LedesmaRAJirasetpatanaN (2001) The feasibility of establishing a secondary mortgage market in the Philippines. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 (accessed 12 April 2024).
29.
McGregorJ (2014) Sentimentality or speculation? Diaspora investment, crisis economies and urban transformation. Geoforum56: 172–181.
30.
MaurerB (2012) Mobile money: Communication, consumption and change in the payments space. Journal of Development Studies48(5): 589–604.
31.
MedinaECornelioJ (2021) The prosperity ethic: Neoliberal christianity and the rise of the new prosperity gospel in the Philippines. Pneuma43(1): 72–93.
32.
MellyC (2010) Inside-out houses: Urban belonging and imagined futures in Dakar, Senegal. Comparative Studies in Society and History52(1): 37–65.
33.
Nirmal RoyVP (2020) Part-time brokers in financialised rural land markets: Processes, typology and implications. Review of Development and Change25(1): 70–88.
34.
Obeng-OdoomF (2011) Real estate agents in Ghana: A suitable case for regulation?Regional Studies45(3): 403–416.
35.
Obeng-OdoomF (2015) Informal real estate brokerage as a socially-embedded market for economic development in Africa. In: AbdulaiRTObeng-OdoomFOchiengE, et al (eds) Real Estate, Construction and Economic Development in Emerging Market Economies. London: Routledge, pp.224–238.
OrtegaA (2016) Neoliberalizing Spaces in the Philippines: Suburbanization, Transnational Migration and Dispossession. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
38.
OrtegaAAC (2018) Transnational suburbia: Spatialities of gated suburbs and Filipino diaspora in Manila’s periurban fringe. Annals of the American Association of Geographers108(1): 106–124.
39.
PalomeraJ (2014) How did finance capital infiltrate the world of the urban poor? Homeownership and social fragmentation in a Spanish neighborhood: Homeownership and social fragmentation in a Spanish neighborhood. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38(1): 218–235.
40.
Pérez MurciaLEBoccagniP (2022) Selling a house, staging a dream: Real estate agencies and transnational housing between Spain and Ecuador. Migration and Development11: 894–916.
PidoEJ (2017) Migrant Returns. Durham: Duke University Press.
43.
RadicatiA (2022) World class from within: Aspiration, connection and brokering in the Colombo real estate market. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space40: 118–137.
44.
RogersD (2017) Becoming a super-rich foreign real estate investor: Globalising real estate data, publications and events. In: ForrestRKohSYWissinkB (eds) Cities and the Super-Rich. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp.85–104.
45.
RogersDLeeCLYanD (2015) The politics of foreign investment in Australian housing: Chinese investors, translocal sales agents and local resistance. Housing Studies30(5): 730–748.
46.
RollKDolanCRajakD (2021) Remote (Dis)engagement: Shifting corporate risk to the ‘bottom of the pyramid.’ Development and Change52(4): 878–901.
47.
SajorEE (2005) Professionalisation or hybridisation? Real estate brokers in Metro Cebu, the Philippines, during the boom of the 1990s. Urban Studies42(8): 1321–1343.
Sandoval-CervantesI (2017) Uncertain futures: The unfinished houses of undocumented migrants in Oaxaca, Mexico: Uncertain futures and unfinished houses. American Anthropologist119(2): 209–222.
50.
SchiffauerL (2018) Let’s get rich: Multilevel marketing and the moral economy in Siberia. Critique of Anthropology38(3): 285–302.
51.
SearleLG (2018) The contradictions of mediation: Intermediaries and the financialization of urban production. Economy and Society47(4): 524–546.
52.
SilardeVQ (2020) Historical roots and prospects of ending precarious employment in the Philippines. Journal of Labor and Society23(4): 461–484.
SmithLMazzucatoV (2009) Constructing homes, building relationships: Migrant investments in houses. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie100(5): 662–673.
55.
SuarezM (2022) ‘The best investment of your life’: Mortgage lending and transnational care among Ecuadorian migrant women in Barcelona. Ethnos87(1): 133–151.
56.
SudN (2014) The men in the middle: A missing dimension in global land deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies41(4): 593–612.
57.
ThurairajahTHollenbachPAlluriR (2020) Vertical living: Transnational urbanisation and diasporic returns to Wellawatte/Colombo, Sri Lanka. South Asian Diaspora12(1): 73–91.
VarmanRSkålénPBelkRW (2012) Conflicts at the bottom of the pyramid: Profitability, poverty alleviation, and neoliberal governmentality. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing31(1): 19–35.
60.
VarrelA (2020) A job in Dubai and an apartment in Bangalore. City24(5–6): 818–829.
61.
WijburgGAalbersMBBonoF (2021) Cuban migrants and the making of Havana’s property market. Urban Geography42(9): 1362–1387.
62.
WilsonA (1999) The empire of direct sales and the making of Thai entrepreneurs. Critique of Anthropology19(4): 401–422.
63.
ZapataGP (2018) Transnational migration, remittances and the financialization of housing in Colombia. Housing Studies33(3): 343–360.
