This paper examines the shifting fortunes of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant in California to better understand how asset owners are dealing with an increasingly-significant problem in changing energy landscapes: the devaluation of large fixed capital assets. In 2016, Pacific Gas and Electric Company announced a Joint Proposal to retire the Diablo Canyon plant by 2025, the result of a negotiated compromise with labor unions, environmental and community groups. Heralded by many commentators as a model for “just transitions” in the energy sector, this agreement has lately been called into question as new subsidies and political coalitions have emerged to support for the plant's continued operation. This paper investigates the political and economic conditions for the Joint Proposal as an example of “negotiated devaluation,” aiming to understand why and how this strategy took shape, and what lessons it offers for other transition processes. Linking literatures on just transitions and devaluation in the energy sector, we show how negotiated devaluation may offer an emerging strategy for owners of energy assets to manage decline in a changing energy landscape. The case also demonstrates the political contingency of these coalitions and the transitions they subtend, and the limited dimensions of justice that might be affirmed in them.
ACRS (1983) Proposed meeting minutes of the ACRS extreme external phenomena subcommittee meeting. 12 October. Washington, DC: Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. Available at:https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1634/ML16341C116.pdf(accessed 27 August 2022).
2.
BaintonNKempDLèbreE, et al. (2021) The energy-extractives nexus and the just transition. Sustainable Development29(4): 624–634.
3.
BazilianMDCarleySKoniskyD, et al. (2021) Expanding the scope of just transitions: Towards localized solutions and community-level dynamics. Energy Research & Social Science80: 102245.
4.
BridgeG (2018) The map is not the territory: A sympathetic critique of energy research’s spatial turn. Energy Research & Social Science36: 11–20.
ChaMPastorMWanderM, et al. (2019) A roadmap to an equitable, low-carbon future: Four pillars of a just transition. April. Los Angeles: Program for Environmental and Regional Equity, USC Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences.
12.
ChristophersBNiedtC (2016) Resisting devaluation: Foreclosure, eminent domain law, and the geographical political economy of risk. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(3): 485–503.
13.
ClemmerSRichardsonJSattlerS, et al. (2018) The Nuclear Power Dilemma: Declining Profits, Plant Closures, and the Threat of Rising Carbon Emissions. November. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.
EdenhoferOKalkuhlMRequateT, et al. (2020) How assets get stranded: The impact of climate policy on capital and fossil fuel owners. Introduction to the JEEM special section on climate policy and political economy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management100: 102300.
18.
EIA (2012) San Onofre nuclear outage contributes to Southern California’s changing generation profile. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 14 November. Available at:https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=8770(accessed 13 August 2021).
FleischliSHayatB (2014) Power Plant Cooling and Associated Impacts: The Need to Modernize U.S. Power Plants and Protect Our Water Resources and Aquatic Ecosystems. ib:14-04-c, NRDC Issue Brief. Natural Resources Defense Council.
FurnaroA (2021) The Role of Moral Devaluation in Phasing Out Fossil Fuels: Limits for a Socioecological Fix. Antipodeanti.12733. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12733.
23.
GambhirAGreenFPersonPJG (2018) Towards a just and equitable low-carbon energy transition. No 26, Briefing paper, August. London: Grantham Institute.
GlaserA (2012) From Brokdorf to Fukushima: The long journey to nuclear phase-out. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists68(6): 10–21.
26.
GoldenKS (2003) Senate bill 1078: The renewable portfolio standard–California asserts its renewable energy leadership. Ecology Law Quarterly30(3) [University of California, Berkeley, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law]: 693–713.
27.
GrecoAYamamotoD (2019) Geographical political economy of nuclear power plant closures. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences106: 234–243.
28.
HarveyD (1982) The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
JohnsonL (2015) Catastrophic fixes: Cyclical devaluation and accumulation through climate change impacts. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space47(12): 2503–2521.
34.
JohnstonePStirlingA (2020) Comparing nuclear trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom: From regimes to democracies in sociotechnical transitions and discontinuities. Energy Research & Social Science59: 101245.
35.
Joint Proposal (2016) Joint Proposal of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Friends of the Earth, Natural Resources Defense Council, Environment California, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1245, Coalition of California Utility Employees and Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility to retire Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant at expiration of the current operating licenses and replace it with a portfolio of GHG-free resources.
36.
Just Transition Research Collaborative (2018) Mapping Just Transition(s) to a Low-Carbon World. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
37.
KnuthS (2017) Green devaluation: Disruption, divestment, and decommodification for a green economy. Capitalism Nature Socialism28(1): 98–117.
38.
KnuthS (2019) Whatever happened to green collar jobs? Populism and clean energy transition. Annals of the American Association of Geographers109(2): 634–643.
39.
KnuthSPottsSGoldsteinJE (2019) In value’s shadows: Devaluation as accumulation frontier. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space51(2): 461–466.
MJB&A (2016) Joint Proposal for the Orderly Replacement of Diablo Canyon Power Plant with Energy Efficiency and Renewables, June 21. Concord, MA: M.J. Bradley & Associates, LLC. Available at:https://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/safety/dcpp/MJBA_Report.pdf(accessed 13 August 2021).
NewellPMulvaneyD (2013) The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal179(2) [Wiley, The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)]: 132–140.
49.
NewellPSimmsA (2020) How did we do that? Histories and political economies of rapid and just transitions. New Political Economy: 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2020.1810216.
NRC (2015) In the Matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2). 9 November. Rockville, MD: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Available at:https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1531/ML15313A432.pdf(accessed 13 August 2021).
52.
Opinions and Decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with Selected Orders, July-September 1982 (1982) Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances Vol. 16 book 1. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Available at:https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0750/index.html(accessed 21 October 2021).
53.
PegelsALütkenhorstW (2014) Is Germany׳s energy transition a case of successful green industrial policy? Contrasting wind and solar PV. Energy Policy74: 522–534.
54.
PennI (2017) California invested heavily in solar power. Now there’s so much that other states are sometimes paid to take it. Los Angeles Times, 22 June. Available at:http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-fi-electricity-solar/(accessed 13 August 2021).
55.
PennI (2022) U.S. Approves Aid to Extend Life of California Nuclear Plant. The New York Times, 21 November.
56.
PG&E (2016) Retirement of Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Implementation of the Joint Proposal, and Recovery of Associated Costs through Proposed Ratemaking Mechanisms: Prepared Testimony. Before the California Public Utilities Commission. Available at: Application number 16-08.
SchneiderMFroggattA (2022) The world nuclear industry status report 2022. October. Paris: Mycle Schneider Consulting. Available at:https://www.worldnuclearreport.org/.
61.
SchrepferSR (1992) The nuclear crucible: Diablo Canyon and the transformation of the Sierra Club, 1965-1985. California History71(2). [University of California Press, California Historical Society]: 212–237.
62.
SikorTMartinAFisherJ, et al. (2014) Toward an empirical analysis of justice in ecosystem governance. Conservation Letters7(6): 524–532.
V. John White and Associates (2016) A Cost Effective and Reliable Zero Carbon Replacement Strategy for Diablo Canyon Power Plant. California: Friends of the Earth. Available at:https://foe.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/legacy/PlanBfinal.pdf(accessed 13 August 2021).
72.
Vachon TE (2021) The green new deal and just transition frames within the labour movement. In: Räthzel N, Stevis D and Uzzell D (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Environmental Labour Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-71909-8_5.
WattsR (2012) Public Meltdown: The Story of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant. MA: White River Press.
75.
WattsRHinesPDowdsJ (2010) The debate over Re-licensing the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant. The Electricity Journal23(4): 59–67.
76.
WellockT (1998) Critical Masses: Opposition to Nuclear Power in California, 1958-1978. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
77.
WillsJ (2003) Abalone, rattlesnakes and kilowatt monsters: Nature and the atom at Diablo Canyon, California. Cultural Geographies10(2). London: Arnold, Hodder Headline Plc: 149–175.
78.
WillsJ (2006) Conservation Fallout: Nuclear Protest At Diablo Canyon. Reno: University of Nevada Press.
79.
World Nuclear News (2023) Regulatory progress for continued operation of Diablo Canyon. 3 March. Available at: https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Regulatory-progress-for-continued-operation-of-Dia (accessed 4 April 2023).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
