Firms can use legal and spatial scaling to increase their control and capacity to exploit assets. Here we examine how platform firms, like AirBnB, Uber, and Bird, scale their operations through global wealth chains. Their use of law is to maximize wealth creation and protection, while their services use local spaces to extract value from established property, labor, and public thoroughfares. We examine how such ‘networked accumulation’ platform firms use legal and spatial scaling through legal affordances. This includes opportunities for absences, ambiguities and arbitrage that are realized via multi and inter-scalar strategies and produce variegation. Our analysis draws on legal documents, as well as interviews, from Barcelona and San Francisco. The article contributes with a model of how platform firms use legal and spatial scaling, as well as how activists can challenge their operations.
Adler-NissenRDrieschovaA (2019) Track-change diplomacy: Technology, affordances, and the practice of international negotiations. International Studies Quarterly63(3): 531–545.
2.
AguileraTArtioliFColombC (2019) Explaining the diversity of policy responses to platform-mediated short-term rentals in European cities: A comparison of Barcelona, Paris and Milan. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53(7): 1689–1712.
3.
AirbnbS-1 (2020) Form S-1 Registration Statement. Washington: United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
4.
Airbnb, v. Inc. City and County of San Francisco, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 3:16-CV-03615, filed June 27, 2016.
5.
AjdacicLHeemskerkEMGarcia-BernardoJ (2021) The wealth defence industry: A large-scale study on accountancy firms as profit shifting facilitators. New Political Economy 26(4): 690–706.
BenvenutyL (2019) Las sanciones a patentes ilegales se multiplican por siete en un año. La Vanguardia. November 13.
8.
BlomleyNK (1997) The properties of space: History, geography, and gentrification. Urban Geography18(4): 286–295.
9.
Blomley N (2003). Law, property, and the geography of violence: The frontier, the survey, and the grid. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(1): 121–141.
10.
BlomleyNK (2004) Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge.
11.
BrahinskyR (2020) The story of property: Meditations on gentrification, renaming, and possibility. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(5): 837–855.
12.
BraithwaiteJ (2019) Tempered power, variegated capitalism, law and society. Buffalo Law Review67(3): 527–594.
13.
BrennerN (2001) The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography25(4): 591–614.
Bryan D, Rafferty M and Wigan D (2016) Politics, time and space in the era of shadow banking. Review of International Political Economy 23(6): 941–966.
16.
BryanDRaffertyMWiganD (2017a) Capital unchained: Finance, intangible assets and the double life of capital in the offshore world. Review of International Political Economy24(1): 56–86.
17.
BryanDRaffertyMWiganD (2017b) The map and the territory: Exploring capital's New financialized spatialities. In: Handbook on the Geographies of Money and Finance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 86–104.
18.
Carville O, Tartar A and Lin J (2020) Airbnb to America's Big Cities: See You in Court. Bloomberg, 14 February. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-airbnb-ipo-challenges/.
19.
CherryMA (2016) Beyond misclassification: The digital transformation of work. Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal37(3): 577–602.
20.
ChristensenRCSeabrookeLWiganD (2020) Professional action in global wealth chains. Regulation & Governance 1–17. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12370
ChristophersB (2021) A tale of two inequalities: Housing-wealth inequality and tenure inequality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53(3): 573–594.
23.
ChristophersBNiedtC (2016) Resisting devaluation: Foreclosure, eminent domain law, and the geographical political economy of risk. Environment and Planning A48(3): 485–503.
24.
Cocola-GantAGagoA (2019) Airbnb, buy-to-let investment and tourism-driven displacement: A case study in Lisbon. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space0(0): 1–18.
25.
CommonsJ (1924) The Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan Company.
DelaneyD (2002) Beyond the word: Law as a thing of this world. In: HolderJHarrisonC (eds) Current Legal Issues Vol. 5: Law and Geography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 67–83.
28.
DixonAD (2014) The New Geography of Capitalism: Firms, Finance and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
DurriI (2019) Asociación Profesional Élite Taxi v. Uber Systems Spain SL. International Legal Material58(4): 837–848.
30.
ECJ (2017) The Service Provided by Uber Connecting Individuals with Non-professional Drivers Is Covered by Services in the Field of Transport. [Press Release] Luxembourg: Court of Justice of the European Union.
31.
ECJ (2019) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) in In Case C-390/18, 19 December 2019.
32.
EttlingerN (2016) The governance of crowdsourcing: Rationalities of the new exploitation. Environment and Planning A48(11): 2162–2180.
33.
FaulconbridgeJR (2007) Relational networks of knowledge production in transnational law firms. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences38(5): 925–940.
34.
Fields D (2019). Automated landlord: Digital technologies and post-crisis financial accumulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 0(0): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0308518X19846514.
35.
Fields D, and Rogers D (2021). Towards a critical housing studies research agenda on platform real estate. Housing, Theory and Society 38(1): 72–94.
36.
FinérLYlönenM (2017) Tax-driven wealth chains: A multiple case study of tax avoidance in the Finnish mining sector. Critical Perspectives on Accounting48: 53–81.
37.
FleischerV (2010) Regulatory arbitrage. Texas Law Review89: 227.
FriedrichJThiemannM (2021) Introduction–The economic, legal and social dimension of regulatory arbitrage. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 11(2): 81–90.
40.
Garcia-BernardoJFichtnerJTakesFW, et al. (2017) Uncovering offshore financial centers: Conduits and sinks in the global corporate ownership network. Scientific Reports7(1): 1–10.
41.
GibsonJ (1966) The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
42.
GrabherGvan TuijlE (2020) Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms. Environment and Planning A52(5): 1005–1016.
43.
GrahamM (2020) Regulate, replicate, and resist–the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism. Urban Geography41(3): 453–457.
44.
GrahamMHjorthILehdonvirtaV (2017) Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research23(2): 135–162.
45.
HaberlyDWójcikD (2017) Earth incorporated: Centralization and variegation in the global company network. Economic Geography93(3): 241–266.
46.
Harrington, B and Seabrooke L (2020). Transnational professionals. Annual Review of Sociology, 46: 399–417.
47.
HarveyD (1973) 1988). Social Justice and the City. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
48.
HarveyD (2006) Spaces of Global Capitalism – Towards A Theory of Uneven Development. London: Verso.
49.
Hoffman LM and Schmitter Heisler B (2021) Airbnb, Short-Term Rentals and the Future of Housing. London: Routledge.
50.
HovenkampH (2021) Antitrust and platform monopoly. Yale Law Journal130: 20–43.
Katsinas P (2021). Professionalisation of short-term rentals and emergent tourism gentrification in post-crisis Thessaloniki. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53(7): 1652-1670.
55.
KesslerA (2014) Brian Chesky: The ‘sharing economy’ and its enemies. The Wall Street Journal, January 17.
56.
Kreiczer-LevyS (2019) Destabilized Property: Property Law in the Sharing Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
LacyPRutqvistJ (2015) Waste to Wealth: The Circular Economy Advantage. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
LangenbucherK (2021) Regulatory arbitrage–What's Law Got To Do With It?Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 11(2): 91–117.
59.
LangleyP (2020) The folds of social finance: Making markets, remaking the social. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(1): 130–147.
60.
LangleyPLeyshonA (2017) Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society3(1): 11–31.
61.
LeitnerHSheppardESziartoKM (2008) The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33(2): 157–172.
62.
LeshinskyRSchatzL (2018) “I don’t think my landlord will find out:” Airbnb and the challenges of enforcement. Urban Policy and Research36(4): 417–428.
63.
LindahlH (2013) Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MakelaFMcKeeDScassaT (2018) Introduction: The “sharing economy” through the lens of law (pp. 1–13). In: McKeeDMakelaFScassaT (eds) Law and the “Sharing Economy”: Regulating Online Market Platforms. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
66.
MarshallA (2018) As Shared Scooters Invade, Cities Must Decide Whose Vehicles Belong Where’. Wired. April 4.
67.
McKenzieRAtkinsonR (2020) Anchoring capital in place: The grounded impact of international wealth chains on housing markets in London. Urban Studies57(1): 21–38.
68.
MerinoA (2019) L'Ajuntament de Barcelona comença a requisar patinets de lloguer compartit. Naciodigital. September 12.
69.
NormanDA (1988) The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
OECD (2018) Consumption Tax Trends 2018: VAT/GST and Excise Rates, Trends and Policy Issues. Paris: OECD.
72.
OPBP (2017) ‘The Employment Status of Uber Drivers: A Comparative Report Prepared for the Social Law Project’. University of the Western Cape, Oxford: Oxford Pro Bono Publico.
73.
OrquinC (2016) L’ensopegada del patinet: Barcelona intenta regular la circulació dels vehicles queixes del sector i confusió. El Pais. July 17.
74.
OssandónJUretaS (2019) Problematizing markets: Market failures and the government of collective concerns. Economy and Society48(2): 175–196.
75.
PeckJTheodoreN (2007) Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography31(6): 731–772.
76.
PistorK (2019) The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
77.
PottsS (2016) Reterritorializing economic governance: Contracts, space, and law in transborder economic geographies. Environment and Planning A48(3): 523–539.
78.
PritchettWE (2003) The “public menace” of blight: Urban renewal and the private uses of eminent domain. Yale Law and Policy Review21: 1–52.
79.
RamA (2018) Uber wins French employment case. Financial Times. February 8.
80.
RobéJP (2011) The legal structure of the firm. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 1(1): 186.
81.
RogersB (2016) Employment rights in the platform economy: Getting back to basics. Harvard Law & Policy Review10: 480–520.
82.
SaidC (2014) Airbnb to collect hotel taxes for San Francisco rentals. SF Gate, March 31.https://www.sfgate.com.
83.
SaidC (2020) AB5 gig work bill: All your questions answered. San Francisco Chronicle, February 20.
84.
SantosBdS (1987) Law: A map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society14(3): 279–302.
SeabrookeLWiganD (2017) The governance of global wealth chains. Review of International Political Economy24(1): 1–29.
87.
Seidl T (2020). The politics of platform capitalism: A case study on the regulation of Uber in New York. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12353
88.
SFMTA (2020) Curb Management Strategy. San Francisco: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency.
89.
SharmanJC (2017) Illicit global wealth chains after the financial crisis: Micro-states and an unusual suspect. Review of International Political Economy24(1): 30–55.
90.
SheppardE (2002) The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography78(3): 307–330.
91.
StehlinJHodsonMMcMeekinA (2020) Platform mobilities and the production of urban space: Toward a typology of platformization trajectories. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(7): 1250–1268.
92.
TanseyRHaarK (2019) Uber Influential. Brussels: Corporate Europe Observatory and AK Europa.
93.
TeresaBF (2016) Managing fictitious capital: The legal geography of investment and political struggle in rental housing in New York City. Environment and Planning A. Economy and Space48(3): 465–484.
94.
TörnbergPChiappiniL (2020) Selling black places on Airbnb: Colonial discourse and the marketing of black communities in New York city. Environment and Planning A52(3): 553–572.
95.
Uber (2021) Form 10-K Uber Technologies Inc. Annual Report. Washington: United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
96.
UberS-1 (2019) Form S-1 Registration Statement. Washington: United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
97.
WachsmuthDWeislerA (2018) Airbnb and the rent gap: Gentrification through the sharing economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(6): 1147–1170.
98.
Watson M (2019). A bird, lime, skip, and a jump towards E-Scooter regulation. Nova Law Review 44(2): 261-289.
99.
WellsKJAttohKCullenD (2021) “Just-in-Place” labor: Driver organizing in the Uber workplace. Environment and Planning A53(2): 315–331.
100.
WhitfieldLStaritzC (2021) Local supplier firms in Madagascar's Apparel export industry: Upgrading paths, transnational social relations and regional production networks. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53(4): 763–784.
101.
WiganD (2021) Uber Global Wealth Chains (pp. 194-214). In: Unger B, Rossel L and Ferwerda J (eds)Combating Fiscal Fraud and Empowering Regulators. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
102.
YablonCM (2019) The lawyer As accomplice. Cannabis, Uber, Airbnb, and the ethics of advising “disruptive” businesses. Minnesota Law Review104: 309–384.
