During the Cold War, a barrage of globally mobile development professionals proliferated throughout the decolonizing Third World to both assist in economic development and to constrain the geopolitical spread of communist-sympathetic regimes. This paper considers a document authored by one such professional, Albert Winsemius, and draws on Antonio Gramsci’s concept of passive revolution to theorize the process of state formation in Singapore. By examining Winsemius’ role in Singapore’s development planning, we demonstrate how globally sourced, ideological anti-communism and transnational economic expertise were inscribed into the institutional structure of the Singaporean state under Lee Kuan Yew and the People’s Action Party. Basing our analysis in a close reading of a key economic planning document, we argue that Winsemius and the Industrial Survey Mission demonstrate a political understanding of state formation rooted in the need to suppress labour strife and maintain political stability. This paper contributes to a more spatially nuanced understanding of East Asian industrialization and state transformation through a theorization of the influence of transnational expertise on an archetypal ‘developmental state’.
AgnewJ (1994)
The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory.Review of International Political Economy1(1): 53–80.
2.
AirriessCA (2001)
Regional production, information–communication technology, and the developmental state: The rise of Singapore as a global container hub.Geoforum32(2): 235–254.
3.
AkhterM (2015a)
Infrastructure nation: State space, hegemony, and hydraulic regionalism in Pakistan.Antipode47(4): 849–870.
4.
AkhterM (2015b)
The hydropolitical cold war: The Indus waters treaty and state formation in Pakistan.Political Geography46: 65–75.
5.
AkhterM (2017)
Desiring the data state on the Indus Basin.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(3): 377–389.
6.
AkhterMOrmerodKJ (2015)
The irrigation technozone: State power, expertise, and agrarian development in the US West and British Punjab, 1880–1920.Geoforum60: 123–132.
7.
AmsdenAH (1992) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
8.
ArnoldDHessM (2017)
Governmentalizing Gramsci: Topologies of power and passive revolution in Cambodia’s garment production network.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(10): 2183–2202.
9.
Boon-‐KhengC (2006).
The left‐wing movement in Malaya, Singapore and Borneo in the 1960s: ‘an era of hope or devil’s decade’?Inter‐Asia Cultural Studies7(4): 634–649.
10.
BrooksALoftusA (2016).
Africa’s passive revolution: Crisis in Malawi.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers41(3): 258–272.
11.
CastellsM (1988) The Developmental City-State in an Open World Economy: The Singapore Experience.
Berkeley:
University of California.
12.
ChanHC (1975) Politics in an administrative state: Where has the politics gone? In: Seah CM (ed) Trends in Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press, pp. 51–68.
13.
ChangHJ (2002)
Breaking the mould: An institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo‐liberal theory of the market and the state.Cambridge Journal of Economics26(5): 539–559.
14.
ChngR (2000)
Foreign yes, but all talent?Singapore November/December: 8–13.
15.
ChuaBH (2017) Liberalism Disavowed: Communitarianism and State Capitalism in Singapore.
Singapore:
NUS Press.
16.
CraggsRNeateH (2017)
Post‐colonial careering and urban policy mobility: Between Britain and Nigeria, 1945–1990.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(1): 44–57.
17.
DesaiR (2013) Geopolitical Economy: After US Hegemony, Globalization and Empire.
London:
Pluto Press.
18.
DoucetteJLeeSO (2015)
Experimental territoriality: Assembling the Kaesong industrial complex in North Korea.Political Geography47: 53–63.
19.
DoucetteJMüllerAR (2016)
Exporting the Saemaul spirit: South Korea’s knowledge sharing program and the ‘rendering technical’ of Korean development.Geoforum,
75: 29–39.
20.
DoucetteJParkBG (2017)
Urban developmentalism in East Asia: Geopolitical economics, spaces of exception, and networks of expertise.Critical Sociology44(3): 395–403.
21.
EDB Singapore (2018). About EDB. Available at: https://www.edb.gov.sg (accessed 15 January 2018).
22.
FineBSaraswatiJTavasicD (2013) Beyond the Developmental State: Industrial Policy into the 21st Century.
London:
Pluto Press.
23.
GainsboroughM (2009)
The (neglected) statist bias and the developmental state: The case of Singapore and Vietnam.Third World Quarterly30(7): 1317–1328.
24.
Glassman J (2004) Thailand at the Margins: Internationalization of the state and the transformation of labour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
GlassmanJ (2016)
Emerging Asias: Transnational forces, developmental states, and ‘Asian values’.The Professional Geographer68(2): 322–329.
26.
GlassmanJ (2018a) Drums of War, Drums of Development: The Formation of a Pacific Ruling Class and Industrial Transformation in East and Southeast Asia, 1945–1980.
Leiden:
Brill.
27.
GlassmanJ (2018b)
Geopolitical economies of development and democratization in East Asia: Themes, concepts, and geographies.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(2): 407–415.
28.
GlassmanJChoiYJ (2014)
The Chaebol and the US military–industrial complex: Cold war geopolitical economy and South Korean industrialization.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space46(5): 1160–1180.
29.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith (eds and transl). New York: International Publishers.
30.
GramsciA. (2011 [1996]). Prison Notebooks, Volume 2.
New York:
Columbia University Press.
31.
GrayK (2014) Labour and Development in East Asia: Social Forces and Passive Revolution.
London:
Routledge.
32.
GuhaR (1994) The prose of counter-insurgency. In DirksNBEleyGOrtnerS, et al. (eds) Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press, pp.336–371.
33.
HailaA (2015) Urban Land Rent: Singapore as a Property State.
Oxford:
Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
Hamilton-HartN (2002) Asian States, Asian Bankers: Central Banking in Southeast Asia.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
35.
HartG (2018)
Relational comparison revisited: Marxist postcolonial geographies in practice. Progress in Human Geography42(3): 371–394.
36.
HeksethC (2017)
Passive revolution: A universal concept with geographical seats. Review of International Studies43(3): 389–408.
37.
HongJ (2015) New lessons from Dutch economist. The Straits Times, 21 August.
38.
HsuJY (2017)
State transformation and the evolution of economic nationalism in the East Asian developmental state: The Taiwanese semiconductor industry as case study.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(2): 166–178.
39.
HsuJYGimmDWGlassmanJ (2018)
A tale of two industrial zones: A geopolitical economy of differential development in Ulsan, South Korea, and Kaohsiung, Taiwan.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(2): 457–273.
40.
HuffWG (1995)
The developmental state, government, and Singapore’s economic development since 1960.World Development23(8): 1421–1438.
41.
HwangJT (2016)
Escaping the territorially trapped East Asian developmental state thesis.The Professional Geographer68(4): 554–560.
42.
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (1952) The Economic Development of Jamaica.
Baltimore, MD:
The Johns Hopkins Press.
43.
Ives P and Short N (2013) On Gramsci and the international: A textual analysis. Review of International Studies 39(3): 621–642.
44.
JohnsonC (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy: 1925–1975.
Palo Alto, CA:
Stanford University Press.
45.
JohnsonC (1999) The developmental state: Odyssey of a concept. In: Woo-CumingsM (ed.) The Developmental State.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press, pp.32–60.
46.
JonesE (1994)
Asia’s fate: A response to the Singapore school. The National Interest35: 18–28.
47.
KothariU (2006)
Spatial practices and imaginaries: Experiences of colonial officers and development professionals.Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography27(3): 235–253.
48.
LarnerWLaurieN (2010)
Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water.Geoforum41(2): 218–226.
49.
Latham ME (2010) The right kind of revolution: Modernization, development, and US foreign policy from the Cold War to the present. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
LeeKY (2000) From Third World to First: The Singapore story, 1965–2000.
New York:
HarperCollins.
52.
LeeSOWainwrightJGlassmanJ (2018)
Geopolitical economy and the production of territory: The case of US–China geopolitical-economic competition in Asia.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(2): 416–436.
53.
LePoerBL (ed.) (1989) Singapore: A Country Study.
Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.
54.
Ministry of Finance (1961) State of Singapore development plan: 1961-1964. Singapore: Government Printing Office.
55.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
56.
MortonAD (2007) Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy.
London:
Pluto Press.
57.
MortonAD (2010) The geopolitics of passive revolution. In: AnievasA (ed.) Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism.
London:
Routledge.
58.
NashF (2013)
Participation and passive revolution: The reproduction of neoliberal water governance mechanisms in Durban, South Africa.Antipode45(1): 101–120.
59.
NevelingP (2015). Export processing zones, special economic zones and the long march of capitalist development policies during the Cold War. In: JamesLLeakeE (eds) Decolonization and the Cold War: Negotiating Independence.
London:
Bloomsbury.
60.
ParkBG (2013).
State rescaling in non-Western contexts.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(4): 1115–1122.
61.
PeetRHartwickE (2015) Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives.
New York:
Guilford Press.
62.
PereiraA (2008)
Whither the developmental state? Explaining Singapore’s continued developmentalism.Third World Quarterly29(6): 1189–1203.
63.
PoulantzasN (1978) State, Power, Socialism.
London:
Verso Books.
64.
RodanG (1989) The Political Economy of Singapore’s Industrialization: National State and International Capital.
New York:
St. Martin’s Press.
65.
RosenG (1985) Western Economists and Eastern Societies: Agents of Change in South Asia, 1950–1970.
Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
66.
ScottJ (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Failed.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
67.
SengLK (2013) Squatters into Citizens: The 1961 Bukit Ho Swee Fire and the Making of Modern Singapore.
Singapore:
NUS Press.
68.
SheppardE (2016) Limits to Globalization: Disruptive Geographies of Capitalist Development.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
69.
ShipwayM (2007) Decolonization and its Impact: A Comparative Approach to the End of the Colonial Empires.
Hoboken:
Wiley.
70.
SneddonC (2015) Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
71.
SongHY (2013)
Marxist critiques of the developmental state and the fetishism of national development.Antipode45(5): 1254–1276.
72.
Straits Times (1979) New, 10-year plan to reshape economy. Straits Times, 24 May, 1.
73.
TamboerK (1996) Albert Winsemius, ‘founding father’ of Singapore. I.I.A.S. Newsletter 9.
74.
ThomasPD (2006)
Modernity as ‘passive revolution’: Gramsci and the fundamental concepts of historical materialism.Journal of the Canadian Historical Association/Revue de la Société historique du Canada17(2): 61–78.
75.
TrockiCA (2006) Singapore: Wealth, Power and the Culture of Control.
London:
Routledge.
76.
TurnbullCM (2009) A History of Modern Singapore, 1819–2005.
Singapore:
NUS Press.
77.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2015) UNDP and the making of Singapore’s public service: Lessons from Albert Winsemius. Singapore: UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.
78.
United Nations (Industrial Survey Mission) (1961) A Proposed Industrialization Programme for the State of Singapore. Singapore: UN Commissioner for Technical Assistance, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
79.
UsherM (2018) Desali-nation: Techno-diplomacy and hydraulic state restructuring through reverse osmosis membranes in Singapore. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Epub ahead of print 30 April 2018. DOI: 10.11/tran.12256.
80.
VermaAKochanTALansburyRD (1995) Lessons from the Asian experience: A summary. In: VermaAKochanTALansburyRD (eds) Employment Relations in Growing Asian Economies.
London:
Routledge, pp.336–367.
81.
VisscherS (2002) Business, ethnicity and the state: The representational relationship of the Singapore Chinese chamber of commerce and the state, 1945–1997. Masters’ Thesis, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
82.
VisscherS (2007) The Business of Politics and Ethnicity: A History of the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Singapore:
NUS Press.
83.
WadeR (1990) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
84.
WadeR (1996)
Japan, the World Bank, and the art of paradigm maintenance: ‘The East Asian Miracle’ in political perspective. New Left Review217: 3.
85.
WainwrightJ (2010).
On Gramsci’s ‘conceptions of the world’.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35(4): 507–521.
WinsemiusAPincusJA (1962) Methods of Industrial Development: With Special Reference to Less Developed Areas.
Paris:
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
YeungHWC (2014)
Governing the market in a globalizing era: Developmental states, global production networks and inter-firm dynamics in East Asia.Review of International Political Economy21(1): 70–101.
90.
YeungHWC (2017)
Rethinking the East Asian developmental state in its historical context: Finance, geopolitics and bureaucracy.Area Development and Policy2(1): 1–23.
91.
YongC (2016) A personal aspect to Singapore and Dutch Ties. The Straits Times, 25 November.
92.
YouJS (2017)
Demystifying the Park Chung-Hee Myth: Land reform in the evolution of Korea’s developmental state.Journal of Contemporary Asia47(4): 535–556.
