BarnesTJ (2018) Decline and Fall? Environment and Planning A. 50(7): 1496–1499.
2.
BarnesTJSheppardE (2010)
“Nothing includes everything”: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography.Progress in Human Geography34(2): 193–214.
3.
ChristophersonS (1989)
On being outside “the project.”Antipode21: 83–89.
4.
CumbersA (2018) What is a “person” like you doing in a “place” like that? Reflections on the business school migration from economic geography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 50(7): 1519–1524.
5.
DattaK (2017) “Mainstreaming” the “alternative”? The financialization of transnational migrant remittances. In: MartinRPollardJ (eds.) Handbook on the Geographies of Money and Finance.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar, pp.539–561.
6.
DeutscheR (1991)
Boys town.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space9: 5–30.
7.
Di FeliciantonioC (2016)
Subjectification in times of indebtedness and neoliberal/austerity urbanism.Antipode48: 1206–1227.
8.
FosterJMuellerleileCOldsKet al. (2007)
Circulating economic geographies: Citation pattern and citation behaviour in economic geography, 1982–2006.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32: 295–312.
9.
Gibson-GrahamJK (2008)
Diverse economies: Performative practices for “other worlds.”Progress in Human Geography32: 613–632.
10.
HierofaniPY (2016)
Gender, work, and migration: Reflections on feminist geography contributions and challenges.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48: 2076–2080.
11.
JamesABradshawMCoeNMet al. (2018a) We’re in business! Sustaining economic geography? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. Economic Geography Research Group working paper.
12.
JamesABradshawMCoeNM, andFaulconbridgeJ (2018b) Sustaining economic geography? Management and business schools and UK’s great economic geography diaspora. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 50(6): 1355–1366.
13.
KarwowskiEStockhammerE (2017)
Financialisation in emerging economies: A systematic overview and comparison with Anglo-Saxon economies.Economic and Political Studies5: 60–86.
14.
LarnerW (2016)
Beyond father and Ford: After feminism and fashion.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48: 2072–2075.
15.
LeyshonA (2018) Unfinished business. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 50(7): 1532–1535.
16.
MacLeavyJRobertsS, andStraussK (2016)
Feminist inclusions in economic geography: What difference does difference make?Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48: 2067–2071.
17.
MartinR (2018) Is British economic geography in decline? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 50(7): 1503–1509.
18.
MasseyD (1991)
Flexible sexism.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space9: 31–57.
19.
McDowellL (2016)
Reflections of feminist economic geography: Talking to ourselves?Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48: 2093–2099.
20.
MottCCockayneD (2017)
Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of “conscientious engagement.”Gender, Place & Culture24: 954–973.
21.
PollardJ (2013)
Gendering capital: Financial crisis, financialization and (an agenda for) economic geography. Progress in Human Geography37: 403–423.
22.
PollardJMcEwanCLaurieNet al. (2009)
Economic geography under postcolonial scrutiny.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers34: 137–142.
23.
RobinEBrillF (2018)
The global politics of an urban age: Creating “cities for all” in the age of financialisation.Palgrave Communications4: 1–5.
24.
Rodriguez-PoseA (2018) Threat or opportunity? On the “cross-corridor diaspora” of British economic geographers. Environment and Planning A: Society and Space, e 50(7): 1500–1502.
25.
SmithBE (2016)
Life with mother and Marx: Work gender and class revisited (again).Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48: 2085–2088.
26.
WernerMStraussKParkerBet al. (2017)
Feminist political economy in geography: Why now, what is different, and what for?Geoforum79: 1–4.