This paper investigates the distribution of and motivations for zoning decisions that decreased allowed residential density or prevented denser residential development in urbanized portions of Durham, North Carolina, from 1945 through 2014. It presents quantitative evidence that prior to 1985, racial demographics offer a better explanation for the distribution of these potentially exclusionary decisions than median incomes or homeownership rates. This finding is substantiated by qualitative evidence from plans, records of public hearings, and other primary materials pertinent to zoning decisions affecting residential land use. The paper secondly presents evidence that since 1985, the city has made residential zoning decisions that have collectively entailed less dissimilar treatment of areas of different racial characteristics, and suggests reasons for this shift based on further research of primary materials. These findings inform us of the role of racial bias in zoning beyond the era of explicit racial zoning in the early 20th-century.
Ancestry.com (2007) North Carolina, Marriage Index, 1741–2004.
Provo, UT, USA:
Ancestry.com Operations Inc.
2.
Ancestry.com (2010) U.S. Public Records Index, 1950–1993,
vol.1.
Provo, UT, USA:
Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.
3.
Ancestry.com (2011) U.S. City Directories, 1822–1995.
Provo, UT, USA:
Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.
4.
Ancestry.com (2012) 1940 United States Federal Census.
Provo, UT, USA:
Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.
5.
Ancestry.com (2015) North Carolina, Marriage Records, 1741–2011.
Provo, UT, USA:
Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.
6.
AndersonJB (2011) Durham County: A History of Durham County, North Carolina.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
7.
AndrewsRNBurbyRTurnerAG (1985) Hazardous Materials in North Carolina: A Guide for Decisionmakers in Local Government. Conservation Foundation of North Carolina. Available at: http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/17/16896.pdf (accessed 16 January 2018)
8.
BabcockRF (1966) The Zoning Game: Municipal Practices and Policies.
Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
BerryC (2001)
Land use regulation and residential segregation: Does zoning matter?American Law and Economics Review3(2): 251–274.
10.
BrownCR (1985) Durham’s early twentieth-century suburban neighborhoods. In: Early Twentieth-Century Suburbs in North Carolina: Essays on History, Architecture and Planning. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, pp.39–47.
11.
BruceAA (1926)
Racial zoning by private contract in the light of the constitutions and the rule against restraints on alienation. Illinois Law Review21: 704–717.
12.
City of Durham (1960) Land Use Plan 1960–1980.
Durham, NC:
Department of Planning.
13.
City of Durham Department of Planning and Community Development (1986b) Southwest Durham Plan.
Durham, NC.
Durham County Library, North Carolina Collection.
14.
ClingermayerJC (2004)
Heresthetics and happenstance: Intentional and unintentional exclusionary impacts of the zoning decision-making process. Urban Studies41(2): 377–388.
15.
ConnorMA (2014)
Metropolitan secession and the space of color-blind racism in Atlanta. Journal of Urban Affairs37(4): 436–461.
16.
CrossK (1968) Damar Court and Bacon Street – The story of some decisions made in 1967 concerning public housing in Durham. North Carolina Fund Series Collection 04710, Subseries 6.10 folder 7452, Southern Historical Collection at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
17.
DanielsonMN (1976) The Politics of Exclusion.
New York:
Columbia University Press.
18.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (2015)
Affirmatively furthering fair housing. Federal Register80(136): 42272–42371.
19.
DownsA (1973) Opening up the Suburbs: An Urban Strategy for America.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
20.
Durham City Council Minutes (DCCM), Years through 1996 available in Durham's Office of the City Clerk; years 1997–2014. Available at: http://durhamnc.gov/DocumentCenter
21.
Durham City-County Planning Department (1990) Northwest Central Durham Plan.
Durham, NC:
Durham City-County Planning Department. Durham County Library, North Carolina Collection.
22.
Durham City-County Planning Department. (1991) East Central Durham Plan.
Durham, NC:
Durham City-County Planning Department. Durham County Library, North Carolina Collection.
23.
Durham Zoning Commission (1926) Building Zone Map of Durham, North Carolina.
North Carolina Collection:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
24.
FischelWA (2001) The Homevoter Hypothesis.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
25.
FischelWA (2004)
An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects. Urban Studies41(2): 317–340.
26.
GlaeserELWardBA (2009)
The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics65: 265–278.
27.
HindsDSOrdwayN (1986)
The influence of race on rezoning decisions: Equality of treatment in black and white census tracts, 1955–1980. The Review of Black Political Economy14(4): 51–63.
28.
HirtS (2014) Zoned in the USA: The Origins and Implications of American Land-Use Regulation.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
29.
KosmanJ (1993)
Toward an inclusionary jurisprudence: A reconceptualization of zoning. Catholic University Law Review43(1): 59–108.
30.
Minnesota Population Center (2011) National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 2.0, Minneapolis.
MN:
University of Minnesota.
31.
National Commission on Urban Problems (1968) Building the American City.
Washington, DC:
US Government Printing Office.
32.
NJ Supreme Court (1975) Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mt. Laurel. 67 NJ 151.
33.
NJ Supreme Court (1983) South Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mt. Laurel. 92 NJ 158.
34.
Northeast Central Durham Partners Against Crime Advisory Group (1994) An Initiative to Create a More Secure Living Environment with a Special Focus on North/East Central Durham.
Durham, NC:
City Manager’s Office.
35.
PaulsenK (2012)
Yet even more evidence on the spatial size of cities: Urban spatial expansion in the US, 1980–2000. Regional Science and Urban Economics42: 561–568.
36.
PaulsenK (2014)
Geography, policy or market? New evidence on the measurement and causes of sprawl (and infill) in US metropolitan regions. Urban Studies51(12): 2629–2645.
37.
PendallR (2000a)
Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association66(2): 125–142.
38.
PendallR (2000b)
Opposition to housing: NIMBY and beyond. Urban Affairs Review35(1): 112–136.
39.
PiercyD (1968) Greenberg Housing Controversy: A Case Study in Community Organization. North Carolina Fund Collection, Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina Collection 04710, Subseries 6.7 folder 7120.
40.
PollardW (1931)
Outline of the law of zoning in the United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science155(II): 15–33.
41.
RothwellJT (2011)
Racial enclaves and density zoning: The institutionalized segregation of racial minorities in the United States. American Law and Economics Review13(1): 290–358.
42.
RothwellJMasseyDS (2009)
The effect of density zoning on racial segregation in U.S. urban areas. Urban Affairs Review (Thousand Oaks, CA)44(6): 779–806.
43.
SagerLG (1969)
Tight Little Islands: Exclusionary zoning, equal protection, and the indigent. Stanford Law Review21(4): 767–800.
44.
SarrattJ (1969) Public Housing in Durham, North Carolina: Racial Confrontation in the New South. Chapel Hill, NC:
Political Science Honors Essays, University of North Carolina. North Carolina Collection, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
45.
SilverC (1991)
The racial origins of zoning: Southern cities from 1910–1940. Planning Perspectives6(2): 189–205.
46.
StukesTS (1970) Hayti: A Study of White Economic Investment and Intervention in the Black Urban Poor of Durham, North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: Honors Essays, American Studies, University of North Carolina.
47.
TaylorDE (2014) Toxic Communities: Environmental Racism, Industrial Pollution, and Residential Mobility.
New York:
New York University Press.
48.
TollSI (1969) Zoned American.
New York:
Grossman Publishers.
49.
US Census Bureau (1952) 1950 Census of Population and Housing.
Washington, DC:
Government Printing Office.
50.
US Census Bureau (1981) 1980 Census of Population and Housing.
Washington, DC:
Government Printing Office.
51.
US Census Bureau (2002)
Urban area criteria for census 2000. Federal Register67(51): 11663–11670.
52.
US Census Bureau (2012) 2010 Census of Population and Housing.
Washington, DC:
Government Printing Office.
US Supreme Court (1917) Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60.
55.
US Supreme Court (1926) Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 US 265.
56.
US Supreme Court (2015) Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. 576 US.
57.
WhittemoreAH (2017)
Racial and class bias in zoning: Rezonings involving heavy commercial and industrial land uses in Durham (NC), 1945–2014. Journal of the American Planning Association83(3): 235–248.
58.
WilkinsonEL (1950) Pattern of Negro Segregation in Durham, North Carolina. North Carolina Collection, Durham County Library.
59.
YoungLC (2004)
Breaking the color line: Zoning and opportunity in America’s metropolitan areas. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice8: 667–710.
