BarnesTSheppardE
(2010) ‘Nothing includes everything’: Towards
engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography.
Progress in Human Geography34(2):
193–214.
2.
BassensDvan
MeeterenM
(2015) World cities under conditions of
financialized globalization: Towards an augmented world city
hypothesis. Progress in Human Geography39(6):
752–775.
3.
Brenner N (2017) Debating
planetary urbanization: For an engaged pluralism. Working
Paper, Urban Theory Lab, Harvard GSD, July 2017.
4.
BrennerNSchmidC
(2015) Towards a new epistemology of the
urban?City19(2–3):
151–182.
5.
ConnellR
(2007) Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of
Knowledge in Social Science,
Cambridge: Polity
Press.
6.
Derudder B and Taylor PJ (2017)
Central flow theory: Comparative connectivities in the world-city network.
Regional Studies. DOI:
20.2080/00343404.2017.1330538.
7.
ErnstsonHLawhonMDuminyJ
(2014) Conceptual vectors of African urbanism:
‘Engaged theory-making’ and ‘platforms of engagement’.
Regional Studies48(9):
1563–1577.
8.
Farías I and Bender T (eds) (2010)
Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban
Studies. London: Routledge.
9.
FriedmannJ
(1986) The world city
hypothesis. Development and Change17(1):
69–83.
10.
FriedmannJWolffG
(1982) World city formation: An agenda for
research and action. International Journal of Urban
and Regional Research6(3):
309–344.
11.
GeddesP
(1915) Cities in Evolution: An Introduction to the Town
Planning Movement and to the Study of Civics,
London: Williams &
Norgate.
12.
HallP
(1966) The World Cities,
London: Weidenfeld &
Nicolson.
13.
Harrison J and Hoyler M (eds)
(2018) Doing Global Urban Research. London:
Sage.
14.
Hoyler M, Parnreiter C and Watson
A (eds) (2018) Global City Makers: Economic Actors and Practices in
the World City Network. Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar.
15.
HubbardP
(2018) City, 2nd ed.
London:
Routledge.
16.
Jayne M and Ward K (eds) (2017)
Urban Theory: New Critical Perspectives. London:
Routledge.
17.
Kanai JM, Grant R and Jianu R
(2017) Cities on and off the map: A bibliometric assessment of urban
globalisation research. Urban Studies. DOI:
10.1177/0042098017720385.
18.
Kleibert J (2017) On the global
city map, but not in command? Probing Manila’s position in the world city
network. Environment and Planning A 49(12):
2897–2915.
19.
Krijnen M, Bassens D and van
Meeteren M (2017) Manning circuits of value: Lebanese professionals and
expatriate world-city formation in Beirut. Environment and Planning
A 49(12): 2878–2896.
20.
LeitnerHSheppardE
(2016) Provincializing critical urban theory:
Extending the ecosystem of possibilities.
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40(1):
228–235.
21.
Leon JK (2017) Global cities at
any cost: Resisting municipal mercantilism. City 21(1):
6–24.
22.
McFarlaneC
(2011) Assemblage and critical
urbanism. City15(2):
204–224.
23.
McNeillD
(2017) Global Cities and Urban Theory,
London:
Sage.
24.
Neal ZP (2017) Well connected
compared to what? Rethinking frames of reference in world city network
research. Environment and Planning A 49(12):
2859–2877.
25.
Parnreiter C (2017) Global cities
and the geographical transfer of value. Urban Studies. DOI:
10.1177/0042098017722739.
PeckJ
(2017) Transatlantic city, part 2: Late
entrepreneurialism. Urban Studies54(2):
327–363.
28.
RobinsonJ
(2006) Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and
Development, London:
Routledge.
29.
RobinsonJ
(2011) Cities in a world of cities: The
comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban
and Regional Research35(1):
1–23.
30.
Robinson J (2014) Introduction to
a virtual issue on comparative urbanism. International Journal of
Urban and Regional Research. DOI:
10.1111/1468-2427.12171.
31.
RobinsonJ
(2016a) Thinking cities through elsewhere:
Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies.
Progress in Human Geography40(1):
3–29.
32.
RobinsonJ
(2016b) Theorizing the global urban with ‘global
and world cities research’: Beyond cities and synechdoche.
Dialogues in Human Geography6(3):
268–272.
33.
RoyA
(2009) The 21st-century metropolis: New
geographies of theory. Regional Studies43(6):
819–830.
34.
Roy A and Ong A (eds) (2011)
Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being
Global. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
35.
SassenS
(1991) The Global City: New York, London,
Tokyo, Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University
Press.
36.
SchindlerS
(2017) Towards a paradigm of southern
urbanism. City21(1):
47–64.
37.
ScottAJStorperM
(2015) The nature of cities: The scope and
limits of urban theory. International Journal of
Urban and Regional Research39(1):
1–15.
38.
Sigler TJ and Martinus K (2017)
Extending beyond ‘world cities’ in World City Network (WCN) research: Urban
positionality and economic linkages through the Australia-based corporate
network. Environment and Planning A 49(12):
2916–2937.
39.
SmithRG
(2013) The ordinary city trap.
Environment and Planning A45(10):
2290–2304.
40.
SmithRG
(2014) Beyond the global city concept and the
myth of ‘command and control’. International Journal
of Urban and Regional Research38(1):
98–115.
41.
StorperMScottAJ
(2016) Current debates in urban theory: A
critical assessment. Urban Studies53(6):
1114–1136.
42.
TaylorPJ
(2013) Extraordinary Cities: Millennia of Moral
Syndromes, World-Systems and City/State Relations,
Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar.
TaylorPJHoylerMVerbruggenR
(2010) External urban relational process:
Introducing central flow theory to complement central place
theory. Urban Studies47(13):
2803–2818.
45.
TaylorPJLangRE
(2004) The shock of the new: 100 concepts
describing recent urban change. Environment and
Planning A36(6):
951–958.
46.
van
MeeterenMBassensDDerudderB
(2016a) Doing global urban studies: On the need
for engaged pluralism, frame switching, and methodological
cross-fertilization. Dialogues in Human
Geography6(3):
296–301.
47.
van
MeeterenMDerudderBBassensD
(2016b) Can the straw man speak? An engagement
with postcolonial critiques of ‘global cities research’.
Dialogues in Human Geography6(3):
247–267.
