Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper engages with the digital mediation of cultural and political opinion in simulation gaming, and recent critique of cultural geography’s aptitude for research into digital media. Drawing attention to literatures within carceral geography and cybergeography, and presenting an empirical case study of the simulation computer game Prison Architect, it suggests that rather than being necessarily ephemeral, fleeting and transient, digital cultural production can also be carefully created, curated and manipulated in ways which involve both deep reflection on, and profound shaping of, political attitudes.

Keywords

Carceral geography cultural geography cybergeography simulation games prison conditions punitive attitude digital media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams E (2002) Designer’s notebook: The role of architecture in videogames, Gamasutra. Available at: http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/131352/designers_notebook_the_role_of_.php?page=3 (accessed 26 January, 2015).

Adriaenssen A and Aertsen I (2014) Punitive attitudes: Towards an operationalization to measure individual punitivity in a multidimensional way. European Journal of Criminology 12(1): 92–112.

Allspach

(2010) Landscapes of (neo)liberal control: The transcarceral spaces of federally sentenced women in Canada. Gender, Place and Culture 17(6): 705–723.

Ash

(2009) Emerging spatialities of the screen: Video games and the reconfiguration of spatial awareness. Environment and Planning A 41: 2105–2124.

Ash

(2010a) Teleplastic technologies: Charting practices of orientation and navigation in videogaming. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35: 414–430.

Ash

(2010b) Architectures of affect: Anticipating and manipulating the event in processes of videogame design and testing. Environment and Planning D 28: 653–671.

Ash

(2013) Technologies of captivation: Videogames and the attunement of affect. Body and Society 19(1): 27–51.

Ash

Gallacher

(2011) Cultural geography and videogames. Geography Compass 5/6: 351–368.

Baer

Ravneberg

(2008) The outside and inside in Norwegian and English prisons. Geografiska Annaler B 90(2): 205–216.

10.

Bogost I (2004). A response to critical simulation. Available at: http://www.bogost.com/writing/a_ response_to_critical_simulat.shtml (accessed 3 July 2012).

11.

Cheliotis

(2010) The ambivalent consequences of visibility: Crime and prisons in the mass media. Crime, Media, Culture 6(2): 169–184.

12.

Craine

(2007) The medium has a new message: Media and critical geography. ACME 6: 147–152.

13.

Crang

Crosbie

Graham

(2007) Technology, time–space, and the remediation of neighbourhood life. Environment and Planning A 39(10): 2405–2422.

14.

De Castell

Jenson

(2003) Serious play. Journal of Curriculum Studies 35(6): 649–665.

15.

Dodge

Kitchin

(2007) Virtual places. In: Douglas

Hugget

Perkins

(eds) A Companion Encyclopaedia to Geography, London: Routledge, pp. 519–536.

16.

Downing S and Levan K (2016) Pains of imprisonemnt in a “lock em’ up” video game: Implications for a peacemaking discourse through new media experiences. Contemporary Justice Review 19(1): 142–162.

17.

Foucault

(1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York, NY: Vintage.

18.

Frasca

(2001) Videogames of the Oppressed: Videogames as a Means for Critical Thinking and Debate, Atlanta: School of Literature, Communication, and Culture, Georgia Institute of Technology.

19.

Galloway

(2006) Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

20.

Gilmore

(2002) Fatal couplings of power and difference: Notes on racism and geography. The Professional Geographer 54: 15–24.

21.

Graham

(2013) Geography/internet: Ethereal alternate dimensions of cyberspace or grounded augmented real-lities? The Geographical Journal 179: 177–182.

22.

Hall

Zarro

(2012) Social curation on the website Pinterest.com. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49(1): 1–9.

23.

Hookway

(2014) Interface, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

24.

Jewkes

Moran

(2014) Should prison architecture be brutal, bland or beautiful? Scottish Justice Matters 2(1): 8–11.

25.

Kaiser Family Foundation (2005) Kids & media @ the new millennium. Programme for the Study of Entertainment Media and Health. Available at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/1535-index.cfm (accessed 15 April 2015).

26.

Kearon

(2012) Alternative representation of the prison and imprisonment: Comparing dominant narratives in the news media and in popular fictional texts. Prison Service Journal 199: 4–10.

27.

Kinsley

(2013) The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies. Progress in Human Geography 38: 364–384.

28.

Kitchin

Dodge

(2011) Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life, Cambridge: MIT Press.

29.

Lammes

(2008) Spatial regimes of the digital playground. Space and Culture 11(3): 260–272.

30.

Leonard

(2003) “Live in your world, play in ours”: Race, video games, and consuming the other. Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education 3(4): 1–9.

31.

Leszczynski

(2015) Spatial media/tion. Progress in Human Geography 39(6): 729–751.

32.

Malaby

(2007) Beyond play: A new approach to games. Games and Culture 2(2): 95–113.

33.

Mason P (ed) (2013) Captured by the Media. London: Willan.

34.

Mendler de Suarez

Suarez

Bachofen

(2012) Games for a new climate: Experiencing the complexity of future risks. Pardee Center task force report, Boston: The Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, Boston University.

35.

Moran

(2013a) Carceral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: Visitation, recidivism and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning: D, Society and Space 31(1): 174–190.

36.

Moran

(2013b) Between outside and inside? Prison visiting rooms as liminal carceral spaces. GeoJournal 78(2): 339–351.

37.

Moran

(2015) Carceral Geography: Spaces and Practices of Incarceration, Farnham: Ashgate.

38.

Pratt

Clark

(2005) Penal populism in New Zealand. Punishment and Society 7(3): 303–322.

39.

Rey P (2012) The myth of cyberspace. The New Inquiry. Available at: http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/the-myth-of-cyberspace/ (accessed 3 March 2015).

40.

Rose G (2016a) Rethinking the geographies of cultural ‘objects’ through digital technologies interface, network and friction. Progress in Human Geography 40(3): 334–351.

41.

Rose

(2016b) Cultural geography going viral. Social & Cultural Geography 17(6): 763–767.

42.

Schulzke

(2014) The critical power of virtual dystopias. Games and Culture 9(5): 315–334.

43.

Schwartz

(2006) Fantasy, realism, and the other in recent video games. Space and Culture 9(3): 313–325.

44.

Shaw

(2011) Assembling video game worlds. In: Brunn

(ed.) Engineering Earth: The Impacts of Megaengineering Projects, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 155–172.

45.

Shaw

Sharp

(2013) Playing with the future: Social irrealism and the politics of aesthetics. Social & Cultural Geography 14(3): 341–359.

46.

Thomas

(2006) Video games as moral universes. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies 11: 101–115.

47.

Turner

(2013) The politics of carceral spectacle: Televising prison life. In: Moran

Gill

Conlon

(eds) Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 219–238.

48.

Vili

Moisander

Joy

(2012) Social curation in consumer communities: Consumers as curators of online media content. Advances in Consumer Research 40: 490–495.

49.

Wilson

(2011) Data matter(s): Legitimacy, coding and qualifications-of-life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29: 857–872.

50.

Wozniak KH (2014) American public opinion about prisons. Criminal Justice Review 39(3): 305–324.

The virtual prison as a digital cultural object: Digital mediation of political opinion in simulation gaming

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References