Replacing the Mind

Abstract

While cognitive studies have historically been regarded as falling well within the anthropological brief, there is little evidence that contemporary versions of cognitive anthropology have much bearing in other fields of cognitive study. In this article I discuss the domination within anthropology of analyses which treate cognition as a residual category, and I discuss some of the ways in which cognitive studies which have bearing on anthropological inquiry are being carried out in other disciplines. The failure of anthropology to acknowledge the reemerging cognitive sciences, it is argued, is a result of the dominance of cultural relativism, the ignoring of developments in linquistics, and the resistance to theoretical departures which challenge the integrity of conventional anthropological objects of analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, P. 1984 On the tracks of historical materialism, London Verso.

Bloch, M (ed ) 1975 Introduction Political language and oratory in traditional society, London Academic Press.

1977 The past and the present in the present, in. Man, 12:2, pp. 278-292.

Chomsky, N. 1973 Introduction In Adam Schaff, Language and cognition, New York McGraw-Hill. 1973 For reasons of state, London Fontana . 1978 On the biological basis of language capacities, in G A Miller and E Lenneberg (eds ), Psychology and biology of language and thought, New York/ San Francisco/London

Academic Press

1980 On cognitive structures and their development a reply to Piaget, In. M Piattelli-Palmarini (eds ), Language and learning, London /Henley: RKP.

Cnck, M. 1976 Explorations m language and meaning. towards a semantic anthropology, London

Malaby

Dale P.S. 1972 Language development, Hinsdale, III : Dryden Press.

Fodor, J. 1978 The language of thought, Hassocks Harvester Press. 1980 Reply to Putnam, in: M. Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and learning, London/Henley RKP. 1983 The modulanty of mind, Cambndge, Mass MIT.

Geertz, C. 1984 Culture and social change the Indonesian case, in. Man 19, pp. 511-532

Goody, J. 1977 The domestication of the savage mind, Cambridge: CUP

10.

Hollis, M and Lukes, S (eds ) 1982 Rationality and relativism, Oxford

Basil Blackwell

11.

Jackendoff, R. 1983 Semantics and cognition, Cambridge, Mass MIT.

12.

Kiefer, C. 1977 Psychological anthropology, in Annual Review of Anthropology

13.

Kronenfeld, D.K. and Decker, H.W. 1979 Structuralism, in Annual Review of Anthropology .

14.

Laboratory of Human Cognition 1978 Cognition as a residual category in anthropology, in. Annual Review of Anthropology

15.

Lackner, J.R. and Garret, M. 1973 Resolving ambiguity effects of biasing context in the unattended ear, in Cognition, 1, pp 359-372

16.

Lenneberg, E.H. 1967 Biological foundations of language New York. Wiley

17.

Newmeyer, F. 1980 Linguistic theory m Amenca. New York Academic Press.

18.

Ortner, S. 1984 Theory in anthropology since the sixties, in. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26:1, pp 126-166.

19.

Parkin, D (ed.) 1982 Introduction. Semantic anthropology, London/New York: Academic Press

20.

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.) 1980 Language and learning, London/Henley : RKP.

21.

Rieber, R W. (ed ) 1983 Dialogues on the psychology of language and thought New York/ London

Plenum

22.

Schaff, A. 1973 Language and cognition New York. McGraw-Hill.

23.

Sperber, D. 1980 Cogrntion and the semiotic function, in Piattelli-Palmarini, M (ed.), Language and learning, London /Henley. RKP

24.

Toren, C. 1983 Thinking symbols: a critique of Sperber (1979), in Man, 18, pp 260-268.

25.

Tnesman, A. 1964 Verbal cues, language and meaning in attention, in American Journal of Psychology, 77, pp. 206-214

26.

Turner, V. 1975 Symbolic studies, in Annual Review of Anthropology

27.

Wilson, B (ed.) 1970 Rationality, Oxford

Basil Blackwell