Human ingenuity responds to changing environments and resources with technological sophistication and variations in accumulative behaviors. While anthropologists look to the past and to processes of globalization to sketch these shifts in the natural world, there is a growing awareness that these transformations also occur in digital online worlds. I argue that archaeology’s attention to materiality provides useful analysis and directions for ethnographic video game analysis. I use research from the massively multiplayer online role-playing game World of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, where players marshal social and economic resources in both the natural and digital worlds. In constructing reputations and accumulating prestige, players integrate online and offline resources, traversing the tangible/digital divide in their pursuit of achievement. Archaeological perspectives and theories of aggrandizement, containment, systems, landscapes, and ontological materiality provide opportunities to expand ethnographic video game research and debates into new directions.
AlbertiBFowlesSHolbraadMMarshallYWitmoreC (2011) “Worlds otherwise”: Archaeology, anthropology, and ontological difference. Current Anthropology52(6): 896–912.
2.
BainbridgeWS (2010) The Warcraft Civilization: Social Science in a Virtual World.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BarberSBSánchezMO (2012) A divine wind: The arts of death and music in terminal formative Oaxaca. Ancient Mesoamerica23(1): 9–24.
4.
BennettJ (2010) Virbrant Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BoellstorffT (2006) A ludicrous discipline? Ethnography and game studies. Games and Culture1(1): 29–35.
6.
BoellstorffT (2008) Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BoellstorffT (2010) A typology of ethnographic scales for virtual worlds. In: BainbridgeWS (ed.) Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual. New York: Springer, pp. 123–133.
8.
BoellstorffTNardiBPearceCTaylorTL (2012) Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of MethodPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CastronovaE (2005) Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
ClarkJEBlakeM (1994) The power of prestige: Competitve generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. In: BrumfieldEMFoxJW (eds) Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–30.
12.
DeakinHWakefieldK (2013)Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research14(5): 603–616.
13.
DeLandaM (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. New York: Continuum.
14.
DibbellJ (2006) Play Money: Or, How I Quit My Day Job and Made Millions Trading Virtual Loot. New York: Basic Books.
15.
GeeJP (2004) Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. Literacies. New York: Routledge.
16.
GledhillJ (2005) Some histories are more possible than others: Structural power, big pictures and the goal of explanation in the anthropology of Eric Wolf. Critique of Anthropology25(1): 37–57.
17.
GolubA (2010) Being in the world (of Warcraft): Raiding, realism, and knowledge production in a massively multiplayer online game. Anthropological Quarterly83(1): 17–46.
18.
GrayCHDriscollM (1992) What’s real about virtual reality? Anthropology of, and in, cyberspace. Visual Anthropology Review8(2): 39–49.
19.
HawkesCFC (1954) Archaeological theory and method: Some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist56(2): 155–168.
20.
HaydenB (1995) The emergence of prestige technologies and pottery. In: HoopesJWBarnettWK (eds) The Emergence of Pottery, Technology and Innovation in Ancient Societies. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 257–265.
21.
HeymanJMcC (2003) The inverse of power. Anthropological Theory3(2): 139–156.
22.
HodderI (2012) Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
23.
HorstHAMillerD (2012) Digital Anthropology. London: Berg.
24.
KaptelininVNardiBA (2006) Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
KendallL (2009) How do issues of gender and sexuality influence the structures and processes of qualitative internet research? In: MarkhamANBaymNK (eds) Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 99–118.
26.
KramerC (1985) Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology14: 77–102.
27.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
LeonardiPM (2012) Materiality, sociomateriality, and sociotechnical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In: NardiBALeonardiPMKallinikosJ (eds) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–48.
29.
NakamuraL (2009) Don’t hate the player, hate the game: The racialization of labor in World of Warcraft. Critical Studies in Media Communication26(2): 128–144.
30.
NardiBA (2010) My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
31.
PaulCA (2010) Welfare epics? The rhetoric of rewards in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture5(2): 158–176.
32.
PearceC (2009) Communities of Play: Emergent Cultures in Multiplayer Games and Virtual Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
PfaffenbergerB (1992) Social anthropology of technology. Annual Review of Anthropology21: 491–517.
34.
PinkSHorstHPostillJHjorthLLewisTTacchiJ (2016) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
RettbergS (2008) Corporate ideology in World of Warcraft. In: CorneliussenHGWalker RettbergJ (eds) Digital Culture, Play, and Identity: A World of Warcraft Reader. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 19–38.
36.
RicePM (1999) On the origins of pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory6(1): 1–54.
37.
ShaferDM (2012) Causes of state hostility and enjoyment in player versus player and player versus environment video games. Journal of Communication62: 719–737.
38.
SnodgrassJGDengahHJFLacyMG (2014) “I swear to God, I only want people here who are losers!” Cultural dissonance and the (problematic) allure of Azeroth. Medical Anthropology Quarterly28(4): 480–501.
39.
TaylorTL (2006) Play between Worlds: Exploring Online Game Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
TaylorTL (2018) Watch Me Play: Twitch and the Rise of Game Live Streaming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
ThissenMR (2014) Computer audio-recorded interviewing as a tool for survey research. Social Science Computer Review32(1): 90–104.
42.
ThomasJ (2001) Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: HodderI (ed.) Archaeological Theory Today. Malden, MA: Blackwood.
43.
ThomasJ (2015) The future of archaeological theory. Antiquity89(348): 1287–1296.
44.
WarnierJ-P (2006) Inside and outside: Surfaces and containers. In: TilleyCKeaneWKüchlerSRowlandsMSpyerP (eds) Handbook of Material Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 186–195.
45.
WilleyGR (1977) A consideration of archaeology. Daedalus106(3): 81–95.
46.
WolfER (1990) Distinguished lecture: Facing power – old insights, new questions. American Anthropologist92(3): 586–596.
