This introduction suggests that anthropology often assumes that the people anthropologists work with are relatively powerless. Due to this default, anthropologists tend to design their research and theorizing to reflect a relatively powerless other. We suggest that the accumulated scholarship on studying up, that is, studying those who structure the lives of many others, offers more accurate ways to theorize power and its exercise as partial and situated, as well as more plural and productive ways to imagine anthropological practice and ethics. We also suggest that this line of thinking gives us some ground to speak to the larger direction of the discipline.
GuptaAFergusonJ (eds) (1997) Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
12.
GustersonH (1996)
Studying up revisited. Political and Legal Anthropology Review20(1): 114–119.
13.
HarrisonFV (1997) Ethnography as politics. In: HarrisonFV (ed.) Decolonizing Anthropology: Moving Further Toward an Anthropology for Liberation.
Arlington, VA:
American Anthropological Association.
14.
HoK (2009) Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
15.
HobbesT (1996) Leviathan.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
16.
Hoebel EA, Currier R and Kaiser S (eds) (1982) Crisis in Anthropology: View from Spring Hill.
New York:
Garland Publishing Inc.
17.
HymesD (ed.) (1969) Reinventing Anthropology.
Ann Arbor, MI:
University of Michigan Press.
18.
JobsonRC (2020)
The case for letting anthropology burn: Sociocultural anthropology in 2019. American Anthropologist122(2): 259–271.
19.
KimmererRWLakeFK (2001)
The role of Indigenous burning in land management. Journal of Forestry99(11): 36–41.
20.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory.
Pxford:
Oxford University Press.
21.
LeachER (1961) Pul Eliya – A Village in Ceylon: A Study of Land Tenure and Kinship.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
22.
LeachER (1973) Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure.
London:
Routledge.
23.
NaderL (1972) Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. U.S. Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Office of Education. (white paper), ED 065375.
24.
OrtnerSB (2010)
Access: Reflections on studying up in Hollywood. Ethnography11(2): 211–233.
25.
OrtnerSB (2016)
Dark anthropology and its others: Theory since the eighties. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory6(1): 47–73.
RobbinsJ (2013)
Beyond the suffering subject: Toward an anthropology of the good. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute19(3): 447–462.
28.
SenD (2017) Everyday Sustainability: Gender Justice and Fair Trade Tea in Darjeeling.
New York:
SUNY Press.
29.
SinhaV (2021)
Annihilating the ‘savage slot’ from anthropology: Materializing reflexive practices. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory11(1): 264–272.
30.
SoulelesD (2018)
How to study people who do not want to be studied: Practical reflections on studying up. Political and Legal Anthropology Review41(S1): 51–68.
31.
SteevesPF (2015)
Decolonizing the past and present of the western hemisphere (the Americas). Archaeologies11(1): 42–69.
32.
TraweekS (2021)
Let canons burn?Anthropology Now12(3): 34–38.
33.
TrouillotM-R (2003) Anthropology and the savage slot: The poetics and politics of otherness. In: Global Transformations.
New York:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 7–28.
34.
WolfER (1982) Europe and the People without History.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
35.
WolfER (1990)
Distinguished lecture: Facing power – old insights, new questions. American Anthropologist92(3): 586–596.
