California’s sprawling network of aqueducts and dams is often cited as the embodiment of a high-modernist approach to resource management. But while once widely celebrated, in recent decades this infrastructural system and the institutions that manage it have been the subject of growing criticism and shrinking funding streams. Based on ethnographic research among employees at several California water agencies, this article explores the sense of nostalgia and diminished power experienced by the workers tasked with overseeing these networks. These emic perspectives are frequently articulated in the form of unfavorable comparisons to an imagined past, when the workers believe that their agencies were better resourced and civil engineers’ technical expertise was more respected by the public that they served. Analyzing these stories of declining influence and capacity, the article shows how understandings of individual and institutional power can be conditioned by past paradigms of regional development and technocratic statecraft.
BoyerD (2006)
Ostalgie and the politics of the future in Eastern Germany. Public Culture18(2): 361–381.
11.
CantorA (2020)
Hydrosocial hinterlands: An urban political ecology of Southern California’s hydrosocial territory. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space4(2): 451–474.
12.
CarseAKneasD (2019)
Unbuilt and unfinished: The temporalities of infrastructure. Environment and Society: Advances in Research10: 9–28.
De Coss-CorzoA (2020)
Patchwork: Repair labor and the logic of infrastructure adaptation in Mexico City. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, doi: 10.1177/0263775820938057
15.
de JongFValente-QuinnB (2018)
Infrastructures of utopia: ruination and regeneration of the African future. Africa88(2): 332–351.
16.
DoyleM (2018)
Addressing declining appropriations for Bureau of Reclamation infrastructure: Policies needed for enabling private finance. Journal of the American Water Resources Association54(5): 993–1000.
17.
ElmahrekA (2021a) ‘They thought I was so low’: Women say they were harassed, bullied, ignored at powerful water agency. Los Angeles Times, 12 February.
18.
ElmahrekA (2021b) He was the king of water in the desert. His abusive reign revealed a troubling culture. Los Angeles Times, 18 March.
19.
ErieS (2006) Beyond Chinatown: The Metropolitan Water District, Growth, and the Environment in Southern California.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
20.
FergusonJ (1999) Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
21.
GandyM (2002) Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
22.
GoldsteinDHallK (2017)
Postelection surrealism and nostalgic racism in the hands of Donald Trump. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory7(1): 397–406.
23.
GottliebRFitzsimmonsM (1991) Thirst for Growth: Water Agencies as Hidden Government in California.
Tucson, AZ:
University of Arizona Press.
24.
GumprechtB (2001) The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth.
Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
HanakEGrayBLundJMitchellDChappelleCFahlundA, et al. (2014) Paying for Water in California.
San Francisco:
Public Policy Institute of California.
26.
HarveyPKnoxH (2015) Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
27.
HeslopL (2020)
Roadwork: Expertise at work building roads in the Maldives.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute26: 284–301.
28.
HoffmanA (2001) Vision or Villainy? Origins of the Owens Valley–Los Angeles Water Controversy, 2nd edn.
College Station, TX:
Texas A&M University Press.
29.
HundleyN (2001) The Great Thirst: Californians and Water – A History, rev. edn.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
30.
KahrlW (1983) Water and Power: The Conflict over the Los Angeles Water Supply in the Owens Valley.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
31.
KaikaM (2005) City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City.
New York:
Routledge.
32.
KaikaMSwyngedouwE (2000)
Fetishizing the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(1): 120–138.
33.
Kilroy-MaracK (2013)
Nostalgic for modernity: Reflecting on the early years of the Fann Psychiatric Clinic in Dakar,Senegal. African Identities11(4): 367–380.
34.
LemsA (2016)
Ambiguous longings: Nostalgia as the interplay among self, time and world. Critique of Anthropology36(4): 419–438.
35.
MendozaA (2019)
The aqueduct between us: Inserting and asserting an Indigenous California Indian perspective about Los Angeles water. Master’s thesis, University of California Los Angeles.
36.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, and Modernity.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
37.
MortonGD (2018)
Neoliberal eclipse: Donald Trump, corporate monopolism, and the changing face of work. Dialectical Anthropology42: 207–225.
38.
OrsiJ (2004) Hazardous Metropolis: Flooding and Urban Ecology in Los Angeles.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
39.
ParlaA (2009)
Remembering across the border: Postsocialist nostalgia among Turkish immigrants from Bulgaria. American Ethnologist36(4): 750–767.
40.
PiedCM (2018)
Conservative populist politics and the remaking of the ‘white working class’ in the USA. Dialectical Anthropology42: 193–206.
41.
PiperK (2006) Left in the Dust: How Race and Politics Created a Human and Environmental Tragedy in L.A.
New York:
St. Martin’s Press.
42.
RandleS (forthcoming)
On aqueducts and anxiety: Water infrastructure, ruination, and a region-scaled Anthropocene imaginary. GeoHumanities.
43.
ReisnerM (1993 [1986]) Cadillac Desert: The American West and its Disappearing Water, rev. edn.
New York:
Penguin.
44.
ScottJC (1999) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
45.
SmithD (2020)
Un Bonheur d’Orly: The airport, modernity and nostalgia for a lost future. Modern & Contemporary France28(1): 71–86.
46.
StensrudA (2019) ‘
You cannot contradict the engineer’: Disencounters of modern technology, climate change, and power in the Peruvian Andes. Critique of Anthropology39(4): 420–438.
47.
StewartK (1988)
Nostalgia: A polemic. Cultural Anthropology3(3): 227–241.
48.
SwyngedouwE (2004) Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
49.
TannockS (1995)
Nostalgia critique. Cultural Studies9(3): 453–464.
50.
TodorovaMGilleZ (eds) (2012) Post-communist Nostalgia.
New York:
Berghahn.
51.
WehrK (2004) America’s Fight over Water: The Environmental and Political Effects of Large-scale Water Systems.
New York:
Routledge.
52.
WorsterD (1985) Rivers of Empire: Water, Aridity, and the Growth of the American West, reprint edn.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
53.
YarrowT (2017)
Remains of the future: Rethinking space and time of ruination through the Volta Resettlement Project,Ghana. Cultural Anthropology32(4): 566–591.
54.
ZetlandD (2009)
The end of abundance: How water bureaucrats created and destroyed a Southern California oasis. Water Alternatives2(3): 350–369.
