Anthropologists have posited that citizenship takes on multiple meanings and forms based on citizens’ everyday engagements with state and non-state actors. This article examines forms of citizenship that materialize vis-à-vis the state. In particular, it deals with new imaginaries of citizenship that emerge through interactions between state actors and poor women in counterinsurgency settings. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in the erstwhile Maoist zones of eastern India, I show that, despite knowing the violent face of the state, poor women nevertheless rely on the developmental face of the state to hope for social transformation and imagine better lives and livelihoods. I argue that in doing so they engender an idea of hopeful citizenship.
AnjariaJS (2011)
Ordinary states: Everyday corruption and the politics of space in Mumbai. American Ethnologist38(1): 58–72.
2.
AppaduraiA (2004) The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In: RaoVWaltonM (eds) Culture and Public Action.
Palo Alto, CA:
Stanford University Press, pp. 59–84.
3.
AretxagaB (2003)
Maddening states. Annual Review of Anthropology32: 393–410.
4.
BanerjeeM (2014) Why India Votes?
New Delhi:
Routledge.
5.
BasuI (2011)
Security and development – are they two sides of the same coin? Investigating India’s two-pronged policy towards left-wing extremism. Contemporary South Asia19(4): 373–393.
6.
BhanM (2014) Counterinsurgency, Democracy and the Politics of Identity in India: From Warfare to Welfare?
Abingdon:
Routledge.
7.
ChandraU (2013)
Beyond subalternity: Land, community, and the state in contemporary Jharkhand. Contemporary South Asia21(1): 52–61.
8.
ChandraU (2014)
The Maoist movement in contemporary India. Social Movement Studies13(3): 414–419.
9.
Chitralekha (2012) Ordinary People, Extraordinary Violence: Naxalites and Hindu Extremists in India.
New Delhi:
Routledge.
10.
CodyF (2009)
Inscribing subjects to citizenship: Petitions, literary activism, and the performativity of signature in rural Tamil Nadu. Cultural Anthropology24(3): 347–380.
11.
CorbridgeSWilliamsGSrivastavaMVeronR (2005) Seeing the State.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
12.
CPI(M) (2007)30 years of the Left Front in West Bengal.
Kolkata:
Official Booklet.
13.
CrapanzoV (2003)
Reflections on hope as a category of social and psychological analysis. Cultural Anthropology18(1): 3–32.
14.
CruikshankB (1999) The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
15.
DasV (2008)
Violence, gender and subjectivity. Annual Review of Anthropology37: 283–299.
16.
DasVPooleD (2001) State and its margins: Comparative ethnographies. In: DasVPooleD (eds) Anthropology in the Margins of the State.
Santa Fe, NM:
School of American Research Press, pp. 3–34.
17.
DuffieldM (2007) Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of People.
London:
Polity Press.
18.
FeldmanI (2007)
Difficult distinctions: Refugee law, humanitarian practice, and political identification in Gaza. Cultural Anthropology22(1): 129–169.
19.
FergusonJ (2013)
Declarations of dependence: Labour, personhood, and welfare in Southern Africa. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute19: 223–242.
20.
ForbessAMicheluttiL (2013)
From the mouth of God: Divine kinship in contemporary popular politics. Focaal – Journal of Historical and Global Anthropology67(winter): 3–18.
21.
FullerCJHarrissJ (2000) For an anthropology of the modern Indian state. In: FullerCJBeneiV (eds) The Everyday State and Society in Modern India.
New Delhi:
Social Science Press, pp. 1–30.
22.
GagnéK (2017)
Building a mountain fortress for India: Sympathy, imagination and the reconfiguration of Ladakh into a border area. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies40(2): 222–238.
23.
GardnerKLewisD (2015) Anthropology and Development: Challenges for the Twenty-first Century.
London:
Pluto Press.
24.
GiriS (2011)
The ‘Maoist problem’ and the democratic left in India. Journal of Contemporary Asia39(3): 463–474.
25.
GuptaA (1995)
Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist22: 375–402.
26.
HansenTStepputatF (2001) Introduction. In: Hansen TB and Stepputat F (eds) States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–41.
27.
HansenTBStepputatF (2005) Introduction. In: Hansen TB and Stepputat F (eds) Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–38.
28.
Holston (2008) Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
29.
IsinE (2008) Recasting the Social in Citizenship.
Toronto:
University of Toronto Press.
30.
JakimowT (2014)
Sightings of the state, reflections of self as citizen: Self-becoming in development encounters. European Journal of Development Research26: 905–921.
31.
JansenS (2008)
Hope and the state in the anthropology of home: Preliminary notes. Ethnologia Europaea39(1): 54–60.
32.
JansenS (2014)
Hope for/against the state: Gridding in a besieged Sarajevo suburb. Ethnos79(2): 238–260.
33.
JayalNG (2013) Citizenship and Its Discontents: An Indian History.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
34.
KalpanaK (2008) The Vulnerability of ‘Self-help’: Women and Microfinance in South India. IDS Working Paper 303. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
35.
KamraL (2019)
The expanded state in contemporary India: Counterinsurgency and the Prime Minister’s Rural Development Fellowship. Contemporary South Asia27(1): 1–14.
36.
KamraLChandraU (2017) Maoism and the masses: Critical reflections on revolutionary praxis and subaltern agency. In: Gudavarthy A (ed.) Revolutionary Violence Versus Democracy: Narratives from India. New Delhi: Sage, pp. 191–221.
37.
KarimL (2011) Microfinance and Its Discontents: Women in Debt in Bangladesh.
Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
38.
Kruks-WisnerG (2018) Claiming the State: Active Citizenship and Social Welfare in India.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
39.
KunnathG (2012) Rebels from the Mud Houses: Dalits and the Making of Maoist Revolution in Bihar.
New Delhi:
Social Science Press.
40.
LazarS (2004)
Education for credit: Development as citizenship project in Bolivia. Critique of Anthropology24(3): 301–309.
41.
LazarS (2013)
Citizenship, political agency and technologies of the self in Argentinean trade Unions. Critique of Anthropology33(1): 110–128.
42.
LazarSNuijtenM (2013)
Citizenship, the self, and political agency. Critique of Anthropology33(1): 3–7.
LewickiAO’TooleT (2016)
Acts and practices of citizenship: Muslim women’s activism in the UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies40(1): 152–171.
45.
LiTM (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
46.
LubkemannS (2008) Culture in Chaos: An Anthropology of the Social Condition.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
47.
ManchandaR (2001) Where are the women in South Asian conflicts. In: Manchanda R (ed.) Women, War and Peace in South Asia: Beyond Victimhood and Agency. New Delhi: SAGE, pp. 9–41.
48.
MarshallTH (1992 [1950]) Citizenship and social class. In: Marshall TH and Bottomore T (eds) Citizenship and Social Class. Concord, MA: Pluto Press, pp. 3–51.
49.
MigdalJ (2001) State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
50.
MiyazakiH (2004) The Method of Hope: Anthropology, Philosophy, and Fijian Knowledge.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
51.
MontoyaA (2015)
The turn of the offended: Clientelism in the wake of El Salvador’s 2009 elections. Social Analysis59(4): 101–118.
52.
MontoyaA (2018) The Violence of Democracy: Political Life in Postwar El Salvador.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
MoodieM (2015) We Were Adivasis: Aspiration in an Indian Scheduled Tribe.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
54.
MosseD (2004)
Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change35(4): 639–671.
55.
OngA (1996)
Cultural citizenship as subject-making: Immigrants negotiate racial and cultural boundaries in the United States. Current Anthropology37(5): 737–762.
56.
OngA (1999) Flexible Citizenship. The Cultural Logics of Transnationality.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
57.
PatemanC (1988) The Sexual Contract.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
58.
Rajasingham-SenanayakeD (2001) Ambivalent empowerment: The tragedy of Tamil women in conflict. In: Manchanda R (ed.) Women, War and Peace in South Asia: Beyond Victimhood and Agency. New Delhi: Sage, pp. 102–130.
59.
RoyI (2013)
Development as dignity: Dissensus, equality and contentious politics in Bihar,India. Oxford Development Studies41(4): 517–536.
60.
RoyS (2014)
The Indian women’s movement: Within and beyond NGOisation. Journal of South Asian Development10(1): 96–117.
61.
SareenS (2017)
Who governs local access in Jharkhand? Mechanisms of access to government services. Forum for Development Studies44(2): 249–274.
62.
ScottJ (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
63.
ScottJ (2009) The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
64.
SenAK (1999) Development as Freedom.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
65.
ShahA (2007) ‘
Keeping the state away’: Democracy, politics, and the state in India’s Jharkhand. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute13(1): 129–145.
66.
ShahA (2013)
The tensions over liberal citizenship in a Marxist revolutionary situation: The Maoists in India. Critique of Anthropology33(1): 91–109.
67.
SharmaA (2008) Logics of Empowerment: Development, Gender, and Governance in Neoliberal India.
Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
68.
SinghB (2015) Poverty and the Quest for Life: Spiritual and Material Striving in Rural India.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
69.
SivaramakrishnanKAgrawalA (2003) Introduction: Regional modernities in stories and practices of development. In: Sivaramakrishnan K and Agrawal A (eds) Regional Modernities: The Cultural Politics of Development in India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
70.
SpencerJ (2007) Anthropology, Politics, and the State: Democracy and Violence in South Asia.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
71.
StepputatF (2001) Urbanizing the countryside: Armed conflict, state formation, and the politics of place in contemporary Guatemala. In: Hansen T and Stepputat F (eds) States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
72.
SundarN (2012)
Winning hearts and minds: Emotional wars and the construction of difference. Third World Quarterly33(44): 701–717.
73.
SundarN (2013)
Reflections on civil liberties, citizenship, Adivasi agency and Maoism: A response to Alpa Shah. Critique of Anthropology33(3): 361–368.
74.
SundarN (2016) The Burning Forest: India’s War in Bastar.
New Delhi:
Juggernaut.
75.
TenhunenS (2018) A Village Goes Mobile: Telephony, Mediation, and Social Change in Rural India.
New Delhi:
Oxford University Press.
76.
ThirangamaS (2011) In My Mother’s House: Civil War in Sri Lanka.
New Delhi:
Zubaan.
