Social housing authorities in the UK frequently invoke a language of ‘anti-social behaviour’ and neighbour nuisance in dealing with disputes between tenants. But this language fails to recognise the poor environmental conditions that cause disputes between tenants in the first place. An ethnographic analysis of neighbour disputes identifies a double move from a politics of welfare to one of lawfare: just as housing providers shift the blame onto individual tenants for tenants' perceived failure to act in socially appropriate manners, so tenants end up calling for more policing and tougher neighbourhood control. This politics of lawfare not only places a moral economy of blame at its core but further undermines the possibilities of transforming environmental suffering into redistributive struggles.
AlexanderCSmajeCTimlettRet al. (2009)
Improving social technologies for recycling: Interfaces, estates, multi-family dwellings and infrastructural deprivation. Proceedings of the Institution of Chartered Engineers. Waste and Resources Management162(1): 15–28.
2.
AuyeroJ andSwinstonDA (2009) Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
3.
BearL andMathurN (2015)
Introduction: Remaking the public good: A new anthropology of bureaucracy. Cambridge Journal of Anthropology33(1): 18–34.
4.
BijsterfeldK (2008) Mechanical Sound: Technology, Culture and Public Problems of Noise in the Twentieth Century.
London:
MIT Press
5.
BugraA (1998)
The immoral economy of housing in Turkey.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research22(2): 303–307.
6.
ComaroffJ andComaroffJL (eds) (2006) Law and Disorder in the Postcolony.
United States:
University of Chicago Press.
7.
DenchGGavronK andYoungMD (2006) The New East End: Kinship, Race and Conflict.
London:
Profile Books.
8.
DesmondM (2016) Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City.
New York.
Crown Publishing Group.
9.
EckertJ (2006)
From subjects to citizens: Legalism from below and the homogenisation of the legal sphere.Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law38(53–54): 45–75.
10.
ForbessA andJamesD (2014)
Acts of assistance: Navigating the interstices of the british state with the help of non-profit legal advisers.Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice58(3): 73–89.
11.
FennellC (2015) Last Project Standing: Civics and Sympathy in Post-Welfare Chicago.
London:
University of Minnesota Press.
12.
FriedmanJ (ed) (2003) Globalization, the State, and Violence.
Wlanut Creek, CA:
AltaMira.
13.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society.
New York and Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
14.
HyattS (2011) What was neoliberalism and what comes next? The transformation of citizenship in the law-and-order state. In: PeroDShoreCWrightS (eds) Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Anatomy of Contemporary Power.
New York, Oxford:
Berghan Press, pp.205–223.
15.
HyattS (1997). Poverty in a “post-welfare” landscape: Tenant management policies, self-governance and the democratizaton of knowledge in Great Britain. In: ShoreC andWrightS (eds) Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power.
London and New York:
Routledge, pp.166–182.
16.
KalbD (2009)
Conversations with a polish populist: Tracing hidden histories of globalization, class and dispossession in post-socialism (and beyond).American Ethnologist36(2): 207–223.
17.
KochI (2016)
Bread‐and‐butter politics: Democratic disenchantment and everyday politics on an English council estate.American Ethnologist43(2): 282–294.
18.
KochI (2017a)
Moving beyond punitivism: Punishment, state failure and democracy at the margins. Punishment & Society19(2): 203–220.
19.
KochI (2017b)
When politicians fail: Zombie democracy and the anthropology of actually existing politics. The Sociological Review Monographs65(1): 105–120.
20.
MollonaM (2009) Made in Sheffield. An Ethnography of Industrial Work and Politics.
New York and Oxford:
Berghahn Books.
21.
NarotzkyS (2016)
Between inequality and injustice: Dignity as a motive for mobilisation during the crisis.History and Anthropology26(1): 74–92.
22.
PalomeraJ (2014)
Reciprocity, commodification and poverty in the era of financialisation.Current Anthropology55(S9): S105–S115.
23.
PalomeraJ andVettaT (2016)
Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept.Anthropological Theory16(4): 413–432.
24.
RamsayP (2012) The Insecurity State. Vulnerable Autonomy and the Right to Security in the Criminal Law.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
25.
SabatéI (2016)
The Spanish mortgage crisis and the re-emergence of moral economies in uncertain times.History and Anthropology27(1): 107–120.
26.
SimonJ (2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
27.
SkeggsB (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable.
London:
SAGE.
28.
SmithK (2012) Fairness, Class and Belonging in Contemporary England.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave MacMillan.
29.
StoutS (2016)
Indebted: Disciplining the moral valence of mortgage debt online.Cultural Anthropology31(1): 82–106.
30.
ThompsonEP (1971)
The moral economy of the English crowd in the 18th century.Past & Present50: 76–136.
31.
YoungJ (1999) The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime and Difference in Late Modernity.
London:
SAGE.
32.
WacquantL (2014)
The global firestorm of law and order: On punishment and neoliberalism.Thesis Eleven122(1): 72–88.
33.
WildeM (2016) Our immoral housing policy is set up to punish the poor. The Guardian, 26 September, 2016.
