In this article, I consider how a temporal reorientation of bureaucracy studies – from retrospective analysis of outcomes to prospective analysis of states of possibility manifest in moments of bureaucratic waiting – could help students of bureaucracy to think non-normatively about the relationship between policy and practice. I draw on ethnographic fieldwork with low-level officials at visa permitting offices of a South African immigration bureaucracy to explore how time textures everyday bureaucratic processes and configures one’s understanding of what is possible in bureaucratic encounters. I develop the concept of “dereliction” to describe the ambiguous condition of hope and despair experienced by people engaged in bureaucratic encounters, illuminating the technologies that produce and manage this ambiguity, such as counters, cubbies, and temporary extension permits. While previous authors have shown that bureaucracies work to capture and control time, I shed light on a somewhat different sort of power: bureaucracies’ ability to orient people toward the future.
AmitR (2011) No refuge: Flawed status determination and the failures of South Africa’s refugee system to provide protection. International Journal of Refugee Law23(3): 458–488.
2.
BarnardC (1938) The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BlauP (1955) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Bloch E (1986) The Principle of Hope. 3 vols. Plaice N, Plaice S, and Knight P (trans). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6.
Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Nice R (trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CabotH (2012) The governance of things: Documenting limbo in the Greek asylum procedure. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review35(1): 11–29.
8.
CabotH (2013) The social aesthetics of eligibility: NGO aid and indeterminacy in the Greek asylum process. American Ethnologist40(3): 452–466.
9.
CallonM (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: LawJ (eds) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge, pp. 196–223.
10.
ChalfinB (2010) Neoliberal Frontiers: An Ethnography of Sovereignty in West Africa, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
ChengS (2010) On the Move for Love: Migrant Entertainers and the U.S. Military in South Korea, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
Chipkin I (2011) Beyond the Popular Discourse: Capacity Constraints in the Public Sector. PARI Short Essays, No. 3. Johannesburg: Public Affairs Research Institute.
13.
ChuJ (2010) Cosmologies of Credit: Transnational Mobility and the Politics of Destination in China, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
ComaroffJComaroffJL (2001) Naturing the nation: Aliens, apocalypse and the postcolonial state, special issue for Shula Marks. Journal of Southern African Studies27(3): 627–651.
15.
Derrida J (1992) Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Kamuf P (trans). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
DeryD (1998) “Papereality” and learning in bureaucratic organizations. Administration & Society29(6): 677–689.
17.
FeldmanI (2008) Governing Gaza: Bureaucracy, Authority, and the Work of Rule, 1917–1967, Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.
18.
FuglerudO (2004) Constructing exclusion: The micro-sociology of an immigration department. Social Anthropology12(1): 25–40.
19.
FullerG (2007) The queue project. The Semiotic Review of Books16(3): 1–5.
20.
GellA (1992) The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
GilboyJ (1991) Deciding who gets in: Decision-making by immigration inspectors. Law & Society Review25(3): 571–600.
22.
GouldSJ (1987) Time’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
GrahamM (2002) Emotional bureaucracies: Emotions civil servants, and immigrants in the Swedish welfare state. Ethos30(3): 199–226.
24.
HandelmanD (1981) Introduction: The idea of bureaucratic organization. Social Analysis5: 5–23.
25.
HarperRHR (1998) Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organisational Action, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Hassim S, Kupe T and Worby E (eds) (2008) Go Home or Die Here: Violence, Xenophobia and the Reinvention of Difference in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
27.
HerzfeldM (1992) The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
HeymanJM (1995) Putting power in the anthropology of bureaucracy: The Immigration and Naturalization Service at the Mexico–United States border. Current Anthropology36(2): 261–287.
29.
HeymanJM (2004) The anthropology of power-wielding bureaucracies. Human Organization63(4): 487–500.
30.
HoagC (2010a) The magic of the populace: An ethnography of illegibility in the South African immigration bureaucracy. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review33(1): 6–25.
31.
HoagC (2010b) Fear, enervation, and the systematisation of disorder: Challenges to reforming the Department of Home Affairs. In: DanielJNaidooPPillayDSouthallR (eds) The New South African Review 1: 2010: Development or Decline?, Johannesburg: Wits University Press, pp. 206–217.
32.
HoagC (2011) Assembling partial perspectives: Thoughts on the anthropology of bureaucracy. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review34(1): 81–94.
33.
HornbergerJ (2011) Policing and Human Rights: The Meaning of Violence and Justice in the Everyday Policing of Johannesburg, New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
HullM (2012a) Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
HullM (2012b) Documents and bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology41(1): 251–267.
36.
JacobM-A (2007) Form-made persons: Consent forms as consent’s blind spot. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review30(2): 249–268.
37.
LandauLB (2010) Loving the alien? Citizenship, law, and the future in South Africa’s demonic society. African Affairs109: 213–230.
38.
Landau LB (ed.) (2012) Exorcising the Demons within: Xenophobia, Violence and Statecraft in Contemporary South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
39.
LatourB (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
LeaT (2012) When looking for anarchy, look to the state: Fantasies of regulation in forcing disorder within the Australian indigenous estate. Critique of Anthropology32(2): 109–124.
41.
MathewsA (2011) Instituting Nature: Authority, Expertise, and Power in Mexican Forests, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42.
MiyazakiH (2003) The Method of Hope: Anthropology, Philosophy, and Fijian Knowledge, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
MosseD (2005) Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice, New York, NY: Pluto Press.
44.
MountzA (2011) Where asylum-seekers wait: Feminist counter-topographies of sites between states. Gender, Place & Culture18(3): 381–399.
45.
MunnN (1986) The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
MunnN (1992) The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology21(1): 93–123.
47.
NuijtenM (2003) Power, Community and the State: The Political Anthropology of Organisation in Mexico, Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
48.
PeeblesG (2010) The anthropology of credit and debt. Annual Review of Anthropology39(1): 225–240.
49.
Picard L (2005) The State of the State: Institutional Transformation, Capacity and Political Change in South Africa. The Wits Policy and Development Management Governance Series. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
50.
PoselD (1999) Whiteness and power in the South African civil service: Paradoxes of the apartheid state. Journal of Southern African Studies25(1): 99–119.
51.
Riles A (ed) (2006) Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
52.
ScherzC (2011) Protecting children, preserving families: Moral conflict and actuarial science in a problem of contemporary governance. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review34(1): 33–50.
53.
SegattiAHoagCVigneswaranD (2012) Can organisations learn without political leadership? The case of public sector reform among South African Home Affairs officials. Politique Africaine128: 121–142.
54.
SellerbergA-M (2008) Waiting and rejection: An organizational perspective. Time & Society17(2–3): 349–362.
55.
SelznickP (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study of the Sociology of Formal Organizations, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
56.
SmartASmartJ (2008) Time-space punctuation: Hong Kong’s border regime and limits on mobility. Pacific Affairs81(2): 175–193.
57.
Southern African Migration Project (2008) The perfect storm: The realities of xenophobia in contemporary South Africa. Migration policy series no. 50. Cape Town: IDASA.
58.
SparkeMB (2006) A neoliberal nexus: Economy, security and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border. Political Geography25(2): 151–180.
59.
ThompsonEP (1967) Time, work and discipline in industrial capitalism. Past and Present38: 56–97.
60.
VerderyK (1996) What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
Wa Kabwe-Segatti A and Landau L (eds) (2008) Migration in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Challenges and Questions to Policy-Makers. Paris: Agence Française de Développement.
