This analysis argues that armed Americans and their weapons are central agents in a network of objects and affects. Guns may not only assert agency on people but, also, firearm–human relations – emergent within the contested legal boundaries that discipline their bodily concealment and revelation – are best seen as an enchanted assemblage of performance, control, omnipotence, pleasure, and fear. Both material and semiotic in nature – guns are things that shoot and things that convey meaning. The cultural desire to secretly arm or openly carry a firearm in public spaces, and the range of motivations and reactions that frame it, inform this project. How are gun owners transformed by the corporeal relationships they have with their weapons? Moreover, how is this relationship a mode of affective embodiment, in which the gun so easily merges with its owner, forming and conforming to the body, dissolving into one’s person unconsciously, much like but much differently than a cell phone?
AndersonB (2010) Modulating the excess of affect. In: GreggMSeigworthG (eds) The Affect Theory Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
Appadurai A (1988) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bar hidden weapons on Sullivan's plea. New York Times, May 10, 3.
4.
Baum D (2010) Happiness is a Warn Gun. Harper’s, August, 29–38.
5.
BellJ (2006) Marijuana, guns, crocodiles, and submarines: Economies of desire in the Purari Delta. Oceania76: 220–234.
6.
BennettJ (2001) The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Bourke J (1999) An Intimate History of Killing: Face to Face Killing in Twentieth Century Warfare. London: UK: Basic Books.
8.
BurbickJ (2006) Gun Show Nation: Gun Culture and American Democracy, New York: The New Press.
9.
CaputoP (1977) A Rumor of War, New York: Henry Holt & Co.
10.
ClarkA (2008) Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1977) Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, New York: Viking Press.
12.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Duffy P (2011) 100 years ago, the shot that spurred New York’s gun-control law. New York Times, January 23.
14.
EnloeC (2004) The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
Friedman E (2009) Pastor organizes gun celebration at church. ABCNews.com, June 9.
16.
GallagherS (2005) How the Body Shapes the Mind, Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
17.
GellA (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, London: Oxford University Press.
18.
GreggMSeigworthG (2010) The Affect Theory Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
GrossbergL (1992) We Gotta Get Out of This Place, New York: Routledge.
20.
HarcourtB (2006) Language of the Gun: Youth, Crime, and Public Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HardtMNegriA (2000) Empire, London: Harvard University Press.
22.
HardtMNegriA (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, New York: Penguin Press.
23.
HepburnLMillerMAzraelD (2007) The US gun stock: Results from the 2004 National Firearms Survey. Injury Prevention13: 15–19.
24.
HollonE (1976) Frontier Violence, London: Oxford University Press.
25.
Horton G (2012) Churches offer concealed carry classes to attract members. Religion News Service, 20 December.
26.
KalofLFitzgeraldABaraltL (2004) Animals, women, and weapons: Blurred sexual boundaries in the discourse of sport hunting. Society & Animals12: 237–247.
27.
KingCR (2007) Arming desire: The sexual force of guns in the United States. In: SpringwoodCF (eds) Open Fire: Understanding Global Gun Cultures, London: Berg Publishers, pp. 87–97.
28.
KohnA (2005) Shooters: Myths and Realities of America’s Gun Cultures, New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
KleckGMcElrathK (1991) The effects of weaponry on human violence. Social Force69: 669–692.
30.
KnightonB (2006) Belief in guns and warlords: Freeing Karamojong identity from Africanist theory. African Identities4: 269–286.
31.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32.
LatourB (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33.
LawJ (1993) Organizing Modernity: Social Ordering and Social Theory, Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
Little CC (1993) The war on gun ownership still goes on! Guns & Ammo 37: 35, 74.
35.
Malinowski B (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: George Routledge and Sons, Ltd.
36.
MassumiB (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37.
MaussM (1960) Les Techniques du Corps, Paris: PUF.
38.
Maxwell J and Tapia A (1995) Guns and bibles: Militia extremists blend God and country into a potent mixture. Christianity Today 39(7): 34–37.
39.
Miller D (2009) Stuff. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
40.
MirzelerMKYoungC (2000) Pastoral politics in the northeast periphery in Uganda: AK-47 as change agent. Journal of Modern African Studies38: 407–430.
41.
MyrttinenH (2003) Disarming Masculinities. Disarmament Forum 4/2003: Women, Men, Peace, and Security, Geneva: UN Institute for Disarmament Research.
42.
MyrttinenH (2008) Striking poses – Notes on the performances of violent masculinities in conflict situations. NORMA: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies3: 132–149.
43.
OchsJ (2011) Security and Suspicion: An Ethnography of Everyday Life in Israel, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
44.
PhillipsSMaumeMO (2007) Have gun will shoot? Weapon, instrumentality, intent, and the violent escalation of conflict. Homicide Studies11: 227–294.
45.
PickelKFenchTBettsJ (2003) A cross-modal weapon focus effect: The influence of a weapon’s presence on memory for auditory information. Memory11: 277–292.
Schwartz M (2010) Firing Line. New York Times. Magazine section, July 29, 1.
49.
Sedgewick E (2003) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, and Performativity. Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
SpringwoodCF (2007) Open Fire: Understanding Global Gun Cultures, London: Berg Publishers.
51.
State v. Reid, The (1840) Supreme Court of Alabama. 1 Ala. 612; June 1840, Decided.
52.
StewartK (2007) Ordinary Affects, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53.
StrassbergB (2005) Magic, religion, science, technology, and ethics in a postmodern world. Zygon40: 307–322.
54.
StoekenK (2011) War, Technology, and Anthropology, New York: Berghahn.
55.
StyersR (2004) Making Magic: Religion, Magic, and Science in the Modern World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
TambiahT (1990) Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
TaussigM (1987) Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Taussig M (2003) Viscerality, faith, and skepticism: Another theory of magic. In: Meyer B and Pels P (eds) Magic and Modernity: Interfaces of Revelation and Concealement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp.272–306.
59.
Thompson S (2000) Raging against self defense: A psychiatrist examines the anti-gun mentality. Paper published and distributed by Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, Inc. Available at: http://www.gunlaws.com/Hoplophobia%20Analysis.htm.
60.
TurkleS (2007) Evocative Objects: Things We Think With, Cambridge: MIT Press.
61.
WarnierJ-P (2009) Technology as efficacious action on objects… and subjects. Journal of Material Culture14: 459–470.
62.
WeinerM (1995) Visible and Invisible Realms: Power, Magic, and Colonial Conquest in Bali, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
Wells W and J Horney (2002) Weapon effects and individual intent to do harm: Influences on the escalation of violence. Criminology 40: 265–296.
64.
WinklerA (2011) Gun Fight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America, New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
65.
WoodM (1998) Logging, women and submarines: Some changes in Kamula men’s access to transformative power. Oceania68: 228–248.
66.
ZimringFE (1968) Is gun control likely to reduce violent killings?University of Chicago Law Review35: 721–737.
