Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

■ Palaeoanthropology — the study of hominin evolution — has features which differentiate it from most other sciences. It has long been characterized by the announcement of a dramatic discovery of fossil hominin remains — often following a long and arduous process of field exploration. Commonly this has been accompanied by naming a new species, or even a new genus, to mark the importance and uniqueness of the find. In time, the discipline of palaeoanthropology erodes these claims to uniqueness and merges the claimed individual species with other finds, while in turn new claims to uniqueness accompany new discoveries and announcements. The potential ways in which any set of materials can be classified is vast, and subjective elements determine classificatory schemes. In the study of fossil hominins such schemes do not just reflect preferences between `lumpers' and `splitters' but nationalisms, egos and the maintenance of the image of the scientist-hero.

Keywords

discoveries of fossil mankind history of palaeoanthropology hominins taxonomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argue, D. , D. Donlon , C. Groves and R. Wright (2006) `Homo floresiensis: Microcephalic, Pygmoid, Australopithecus, or Homo?', Journal of Human Evolution 51: 360-74.

Bell, E.T. (1934) `Exponential Numbers', American Mathematical Monthly 41: 411-19.

Brown, P. , T. Sutikna , M.J. Morwood , R.P. Soejono , Jatmiko, E. Wayhu Saptomo et al. (2004) `A New Small-bodied Hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia', Nature 431: 1055-61.

Collard, M. and B. Wood (2000) `How Reliable are Human Phylogenetic Hypotheses?' , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97: 5003-6.

Conroy, G.C. (1997) Reconstructing Human Origins: A Modern Synthesis . New York: Norton.

Curnoe, D. (2008) `On the Number of Ancestral Human Species', in Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, pp. 1-8. Chichester: Wiley.

European Science Foundation (2007) `ERIH Initial Lists', URL (consulted March 2009): http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/activities/research-infrastructures-including-erih/erih-initial-lists.html

Foley, R. (2002) `Adaptive Radiations and Dispersals in Hominin Evolutionary Ecology', Evolutionary Anthropology 11, Supp. 1: 32-7.

Foley, R. (2005) `Species Diversity in Human Evolution: Challenges and Opportunities', Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 60: 67-72.

10.

Foley, R.A. and M.M. Lahr (1997) `Mode 3 Technologies and the Evolution of Modern Humans', Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7: 3-36.

11.

Groves, C. (2004) `The What, Why and How of Primate Taxonomy', International Journal of Primatology 25: 1105-26.

12.

Gyenis, G. (2002) `New Findings - New Problems in Classification of Hominids', Acta Biologica Szegediensis 46: 57-60.

13.

Klein, R.G. (1999) The Human Career: Human Biological and Cultural Origins, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14.

Levine, J. and R.E. Dalton (1962) `Minimum Periods, Modulo P, of First-order Bell Exponential Integers', Mathematics of Computation 16: 416-23.

15.

Mayr, E. (1950) `Taxonomic Categories in Fossil Hominids', Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 15: 109-18.

16.

Morell, V. (1995) Ancestral Passions: The Leakey Family and the Quest for Humankind's Beginnings. New York: Simon and Schuster.

17.

Schwartz, J.K. and I. Tattersall (2002-5) The Human Fossil Record, 4 vols. New York: Wiley.

18.

Shanks, M. and C. Tilley (1987) Re-constructing Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Wilson, D.E. and D.M. Reeder (eds) (2005) Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. URL (consulted March 2009): http://www.bucknell.edu/msw3/

20.

Wood, B. and M. Collard (1999) `The Human Genus', Science 284: 65-71.

Patenting Hominins

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References