Using the Department for International Development’s recent White Paper on Development as a case study, this article critically reassesses Escobar’s notion of development discourse. Rather than being monolithic and static, as Escobar and others have implied, the writers argue that changes can and do take place within development organizations. Not only does the White Paper clearly signal a new direction in policy; it also results both from changes within DFID – in personnel and in the balance of power between interest groups – and between DFID and civil society.
Agrawal, A. (1996) ‘Poststructuralist Approaches to Development: Some Critical Reflections’, Peace and Change21(4): 464–477.
2.
Baden, S. and A.M. Goetz (1998) ‘Who Needs Gender When You can Have Sex?’, in C. Jackson and R. Pearson (eds) Feminist Visions of Development. London: Routledge.
3.
Beall, J. (1998) ‘The Gender and Poverty Nexus in the DFID White Paper: Opportunity or Constraint?’, Journal of International Development10(2): 235–246.
4.
Bhalla, A. and F. Lapeyre (1997) ‘Social Exclusion: Towards an Analytical and Operational Framework’, Development and Change28(3): 413–434.
5.
Burnell, P. (1997) Foreign Aid in a Changing World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
6.
Curtis, M. (1997) ‘OECD Country Profile: The United Kingdon’, in The Reality of Aid: An Independent Review of Development Cooperation. London: Earthscan.
7.
DFID (1997a) Eliminating World Poverty: A Challenge for the 21st Century, CM3789. London: The Stationery Office.
8.
DFID (1997b) A Social Audit for DFID?Report of a seminar held at 1 Great George Street Conference Centre, London, 5 September.
9.
Escobar, A. (1991) ‘Anthropology and the Development Encounter’, in American Ethnologist18(4): 658–682.
10.
Escobar, A. (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Eyben, R. (1998) ‘Development and Anthropology: A View from Inside the Agency’, this issue.
12.
Ferguson, J. (1990) The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Gardner, K. (1997) ‘Mixed Messages: Contested Development and the “Plantation Rehabilitation Project” ’, pp. 133–157 in R.D. Grillo and R.L. Stirrat (eds) Discourses of Development: Anthropological Perspectives. Oxford: Berg.
14.
Gardner, K. and D. Lewis (1996) Anthropology, Development and the Post-Modern Challenge. London: Pluto Press.
15.
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Green, M. (2000) ‘Participatory Development and the Appropriation of Agency in Southern Tanzania’, Critique of Anthropology20(1): 67–89.
17.
Grillo, R.D. and R.L. Stirrat, eds (1997) Discourses of Development: Anthropological Perspectives. Oxford: Berg.
18.
Hewitt, A. and T. Killick (1998) ‘The 1975 and 1997 White Papers Compared: Enriched Vision, Depleted Policies?’, Journal of International Development10(2): 185–194.
19.
Kaufmann, G. (1997) ‘Watching the Developers: A Partial Ethnography’, pp. 107–133 in R.D. Grillo and R.L. Stirrat (eds) Discourses of Development: Anthropological Perspectives. Oxford: Berg.
20.
Kayizzi-Mugerwa, S. (1998) ‘Africa and the Donor Community: From Conditionality to Partnership’, Journal of International Development10(2): 219–226.
21.
Lehmann, A.D. (1997) ‘The Cheapening of Michel Foucault: Discourse Analysis, Innuendo and the Rhetoric of Sarcasm’, Journal of Development Studies33(4): 568–578.
22.
Lewis, D. (1998) ‘A Note on Partnership’, Social Development Newsletter, 6(1).
23.
Lewis, D. and B. Sobhan (1999) ‘Routes of Funding, Roots of Trust? Northern NGOs, Southern NGOs and the Rise of Direct Funding’, Development in Practice9(1/2): 117–129.
24.
Ministry of Overseas Development (1975) The Changing Emphasis in British Aid Policies: More Help for the Poorest. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
25.
Morrissey, O. (1998) ‘ATP is Dead: Long Live Mixed Credits’, Journal of International Development10(2): 247–256.
26.
Perlman, J. (1983) The Myth of Marginality: Urban Poverty and Politics in Rio de Janeiro. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
Phillips, S. and R. Edwards (2000) ‘Development, Impact Assessment and the Praise Culture’, Critique of Anthropology20(1): 47–66.
28.
Pigg, S. (1992) ‘Constructing Social Categories through Place: Social Representations and Development in Nepal’, Comparative Studies in Society and History34(3): 491–513.
29.
Sachs, W., ed. (1992) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge and Power. London: Zed Books.
30.
Sivaramakrishnan, K. and A. Agrawal (1998) ‘Regional Modernities in Stories and Practices of Development’, paper presented at ‘Global and Local Knowledges in Development’, Ford Foundation Crossing Borders Initiative, February, Yale University.
31.
Stirrat, R.L. (2000) ‘Cultures of Consultancy’, Critique of Anthropology20(1): 31–46.
32.
Whaites, A. (1998) ‘The New UK White Paper on International Development: An NGO Perspective’, Journal of International Development10(2): 203–213.
33.
White, A. (1998) ‘British Aid and the White Paper: Dressing a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing in the Emperor’s New Clothes?’, Journal of International Development10(2): 151–166.