Abstract
This article explores two common pitfalls for occupational therapists in carrying out clinical audit: failing to complete the audit cycle to bring about actual improvements in practice and confusing audit with research. Given the demanding circumstances under which most clinicians work, these problems are neither surprising nor unique to occupational therapy.
This article defines clinical audit and summarises good practice in audit. The difficulties with completing the audit cycle are explored and some solutions are suggested. The difference between clinical audit and research is discussed, with strategies for avoiding confusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
