The Funding Agencies' Perspective on the Provision of Electronic Assistive Technology: Equipping for Life?

Abstract

Electronic assistive technology (EAT) — powered wheelchairs, communication equipment and environmental control systems — can greatly improve the user's and carers' quality of life if prescription is timely and appropriate. Despite the benefits that this equipment can bring, the provision of EAT is a highly confused area because different funding agencies with different remits are involved.

As part of a larger research project, a survey was carried out to investigate the remit of and the range of equipment supplied through three funding sources within a given geographical area. This paper gives the results of this survey and presents a snapshot of provision, showing the differences that can occur. It was found that a wide range of equipment was available through these agencies but that the variation in provision was great. Provision was affected adversely by differences in eligibility criteria, referral mechanisms and funding management.

The paper concludes that professionals working in this field should be aware of the level of services provided by all agencies throughout their areas. Solutions such as the Joint funding of equipment are suggested for users who live in areas with services that have stringent criteria and are hence perhaps denied the independence that they could achieve.