Evidence-based practice are the buzz words of current health care. This article explores what evidence-based practice actually means for occupational therapists. Evidence-based practice has two strands. The first strand involves using the best available evidence as part of the clinical decision-making process. The second strand involves drawing the evidence together in the form of systematic reviews. These reviews may then be used to help inform the development of clinical guidelines.
This article outlines and discusses both strands of evidence-based practice and the relevance of each strand to practising occupational therapists. It explores how therapists can locate, evaluate and use evidence to inform their practice. The article focuses particularly on the development of critical appraisal skills. The role of systematic reviews and the relevance of clinical guidelines for occupational therapy are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsK (1991) The limitations of randomised controlled trials in rehabilitation research. Clinical Rehabilitation, 5, 5–8.
2.
AustinCHerbertSI (1995) Clinical guidelines: should we be worried?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58 (11), 481–84.
3.
BennetKJSackettDLHaynesRBNeufeldVR (1987) A controlled trial of teaching critical appraisal of the clinical literature to medical students. Journal of the American Medical Association, 257, 2451–54.
4.
BoultonMFitzpatrickRSwinburnC (1996) Qualitative research in health care: a structured review and evaluation of studies. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2 (3), 171–79.
5.
BurnsAParkK (1992) Proximal femoral fractures in the female patient, a controlled trial: the role of the occupational therapist and the physiotherapist. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55 (10), 397–400.
6.
ChardG (1996) What is the matter with our journal?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59 (9), 417.
7.
CulshawHMS (1995) Evidence-based practice for sale?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58 (6), 233.
8.
DePoyEGitlinLN (1994) Introduction to research. St Louis: Mosby.
9.
DrummondAWalkerM (1996) Generalisation of the effects of leisure rehabilitation for stroke patients. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59 (7), 330–34.
10.
GissaneC (1996) Letter. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59 (11), 539.
11.
GladmanJRF (1991) Some solutions to problems of the randomised controlled trial in rehabilitation research. Clinical Rehabilitation, 5, 9–13.
HowellC (1986) A controlled trial of goal setting for long-term community psychiatric patients. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49 (8), 264–68.
14.
KingUMS (1996) Letter. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59 (9), 445.
15.
KreftingL (1990) Rigour in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45 (3), 214–22.
16.
LawMPolatajkoHJSchafferRMillerJMacnabJ (1991) The impact of heterogeneity in a clinical trial: motor outcomes after sensory integration therapy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 11 (3), 177–89.
17.
PolatajkoHJLawMMillerJSchafferRMacnabJ (1991) The effect of a sensory integration programme on academic achievement, motor performance, and self-esteem in children identified as learning disabled: results of a clinical trial. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 11 (3), 155–76.
18.
RosenbergWDonaldA (1995) Evidence-based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. British Medical Journal, 310, 1122–26.
19.
RyanS (1996) Letter. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59 (9), 445.
20.
SackettDLRosenbergWMCGrayJAMHaynesRBRichardsonWS (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
21.
ShinJHHaynesRBJohnstonME (1993) The effect of problem-based self-directed undergraduate education on life-long learning. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 148, 969–76.
22.
ShoplandAJHardialPMUnwinAMVickersSMWestmoreVRWilliamsAJ (1975) Refer to occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
23.
Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration (1996) A systematic review of specialist multidisciplinary team (stroke unit) care for stroke inpatients. In: WarlowCVan GijnJSandercockP, eds. Stroke module of the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Oxford: Cochrane Centre.
24.
ThomasLCullumNMcCollERousseauN (1996) Systematic review of the effectiveness of guidelines in professions allied to medicine. In: FreemantleNBeroLGrilliRGrimshawJOxmanA, eds. Effective professional practice module of the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Oxford: Cochrane Centre.
25.
Grahame-SmithD (1995) Evidence-based medicine: Socratic dissent. British Medical Journal, 310, 1126–27.
