Part 2 of the article develops the narrative that was described in part 1. The themes that are explored in relation to solving a practical problem are time, adjustment periods, and multiple interpretations of the same story by family members with different roles. What is revealed is the complexity of artistic practice, the dynamic nature of the family members, and the incredible professional sensitivity that is needed in such a situation. The social services occupational therapist reflects on the personal benefits that have been derived from studying and making explicit her clinical reasoning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FishDTwinnSPurrB, (1991) Promoting reflection: Improving the supervision of practice in health visiting and initial teacher training. Twickenham: West London Institute of Higher Education.
2.
MattinglyC, (1994) The narrative nature of clinical reasoning. In: MattinglyCFlemingMH, eds. Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
3.
Social Services Department (1994) Child care policy. London: London Borough of Barking and Dagenham.
