This article discusses some of the factors that make activity an effective and versatile treatment tool. It looks at the theories and techniques underpinning the use of activity as a therapeutic medium. It considers the challenge involved in teaching therapeutic activity to occupational therapy students. Finally, the article draws conclusions about the danger of teaching staff allowing themselves to focus on outcomes at the expense of process and of failing to teach the use of activity effectively to the occupational therapists of the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BooyMJ (1994) Do people do what they say they do? A paradigm for occupational therapy education. Congress Summaries: 11th International Congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists.London: West Square Associates.
2.
BurkeJP (1977) A clinical perspective on motivation: Pawn versus origin. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31(4), 254–58.
3.
CracknellE (1992) Learning through doing. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(11), 411.
4.
De WittPA (1992) Creative ability — A model for psychiatric occupational therapy. In: CrouchRB, ed. Occupational therapy in psychiatry and mental health.2nd ed.Johannesburg: Lifecare Group.
5.
DickoffJJamesP (1968) A theory of theories: A position paper. Nursing Research, 17(3), 197–203.
6.
JoiceACoiaD (1989) A discussion on the skills of the occupational therapist working in a multidisciplinary team. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(12), 466–68.
7.
MeyerA (1922) The philosophy of occupation therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy (1977) 31(10), 639–642. Reprinted from: Archives of Occupational Therapy, 1, 1–10.
8.
SartreJP (1943) Trans.
9.
BarnesHE (1966) Being and nothingness.London: Methuen.
10.
StewartA (1994) Empowerment and enablement: Occupational therapy 2001. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(7), 248–54.
