A study was carried out which looked at ethical dilemmas encountered at work by occupational therapists and physiotherapists. Information about ethical dilemmas was collected through the use of a postal questionnaire to therapists working in the health service in England and Wales. One theme that emerged from content analysis of the dilemmas was telling the truth in the therapeutic relationship. Three main issues emerged: withholding information from patients, usually about diagnosis or prognosis or about services; telling lies to patients for apparently honourable reasons; and telling lies to patients for apparently bad reasons. The present research is related to findings from previous studies in nursing and medicine.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnittRE. What gives you sleepless nights? Ethical practice in occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther1993; 56 (6): 207–12.
2.
BarnittRE. Deeply troubling questions: the teaching of ethics in undergraduate programmes. Br J Occup Ther1993; 56 (11): 401–406.
3.
FrancourR.Biomedical ethics. New York: John Wiley, 1983.
4.
SimJ.Truthfulness in the therapeutic relationship. Physiotherapy Practice1986; 2:121–27.
5.
BeauchampILChildressTL. Principles of biomedical ethics. 3rd ed.New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
6.
ThomasmaDC. Models of the doctor-patient relationships and the ethics committee. Camb Q Health Care Ethics1992; 1:11–32.
7.
British Association of Occupational Therapists. Code of professional conduct. London: BAOT, 1990. (Also, Br J Occup Ther1990; 53 (4): 143–48.)
8.
American Physical Therapy Association. Code of ethics principles. Adopted by the House of Delegates, June 1977.
9.
Bill of rights for patients. Washington: American Hospital Association, 1972: November 17.
10.
Longman's English Larousse. Harlow: Longman, Green, 1989.
11.
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Standards of physiotherapy practice. London: CSP, 1990.
12.
PallesenAE. The case for telling the patient the truth. In: FryJ, ed. Common dilemmas in family medicine. New Jersey: George A Bogden, 1983.
13.
HugmanR.Power in caring professions. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991.
14.
CartwrightAO'BrianM.Social class variations in health care and in the nature of general practitioner consultations. In: StaceyM, ed. The sociology of the National Health Service. Sociological Review Monograph 22. Keele: University of Keele, 1976.
15.
BalintECourtnayJElderAHullSJulianP.The doctor, the patient and the group. London: Routledge, 1993.
16.
MaguireP.The recognition and treatment of affective disorders in cancer patients. Int Rev Appl Psychol1984; 33: 479–91.
17.
MaguireP.Improving the detection of psychiatric problems in cancer patients. Soc Sci Med1985; 20: 819–23.
18.
SeedhouseDLovettL.Practical medical ethics. Chichester: John Wiley, 1992.
19.
LamertonR.Care of the dying, Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1973.
20.
MearnsDThorneB.Person-centred counselling in action. London: Sage, 1988.
21.
Wilson-BarnettJ.Stress in hospital. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1979.
22.
SmailD.Illusion and reality. London: J M Dent, 1984.
23.
UdenGNorbergALindruthAMarhargV.Ethical reasoning in nurses' and physicians' stories about care episodes. J Adv Nurs1992; 17: 1028–34.
24.
Grundstein-AmadoR.Differences in ethical decision-making processes among nurses and doctors. J Adv Nurs1992; 17: 129–37.
Mental Health Act 1959 (England and Wales). White Paper 1978. Mental Health Amendment 1982. London: HMSO, 1959, 1978, 1982.
27.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
28.
VeatchRMTaiE.Talking about death: patterns of lay and professional change. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci1990; 447: 29–45.
29.
WrightRA. Human values in health care, the practice of ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987.
30.
StraussACorbinJ.Basis of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage, 1990.
31.
BondS.Communicating with families of cancer patients: the relatives. Nurs Times1982; 78: 962–65.
32.
BondS.Communicating with families of cancer patients: the nurses. Nurs Times1982; 78: 1027–29.
33.
NovakDHPlumerRSmithRLOchtillHMorrowGRBennettJM. Changes in physicians' attitudes towards telling the cancer patient. J Am Med Assoc1979; 32 (1): 897–900.
34.
ComaroffJMaguireP.Ambiguity and the search for meaning: childhood leukaemia in the modern clinical context. Soc Sci Med1981; 15B: 115–23.
35.
McIntoshJ.Communication and awareness in a cancer ward. London: Croom Helm, 1977.
36.
MaguirePTaitABrookeMThomasCSellwoodR.Effect of counselling on the morbidity associated with mastectomy. Br Med J1980; 281: 1454–56.
37.
British Medical Association. Rights and responsibilities of doctors. London: BMA, 1988.
38.
van HooftS.Moral education for nursing decisions. J Adv Nurs1990; 15: 210–15.
39.
PellegrinoEDThomasmaDC. For the patient's good. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
40.
HuntG.Right from wrong. Nurs Times1993; 89 (25): 22.
41.
HebertPCMeslinEMDunnEV. Measuring the ethical sensitivity of medical students: a study at the University of Toronto. J Med Ethics1992; 18: 142–47.
42.
WinnicottDW. The maturational process and the facilitating environment. London: Hogarth Press, 1963.
43.
EganG.The skilled helper. 4th ed.Pacific Grove, Ca: Brooks/Cole, 1990.
