There is an increasing demand to provide measures of outcome. This article outlines different perspectives on the concept of measures of outcome and considers issues that complicate the practical use of such measures. It is argued that the ultimate responsibility for the development of measures of outcome must remain with the therapist.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BowdenR. In: Chapman B, Patel R. Measuring the quality of our services. Report on conference on quality assurance. Br J Occup Ther1990; 53(10): 435–36.
2.
CruickshankJPalmerGPeelV.How to be an informed buyer. Health Service J1990; 100(5223): 1573–77.
3.
RobertsH.Outcome and performance in health care.London: Public Finance Foundation, 1990: 31–71.
4.
BardsleyMColeJ.Measured steps to outcome. Health Service J1991; 17 Oct: 18–20.
5.
McCullochD.Can we measure ‘output’? Quality-adjusted life years, health indices and occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther1991; 54(6): 219–21.
6.
McIverSCarr-HillR.The NHS and its customers.Booklet 3.York: Centre of Health Economics, 1989: 51–58.
