This paper examines some of the political and socioeconomic aspects impinging upon the development of occupational therapy in the UK and compares the current situation with strategies relating to manpower in the USA. (A second paper will present suggestions for possible action in the UK.)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GriffithsR.Community Care: agenda for action. A Report to the Secretary of State for Social Services by Sir Roy Griffiths. London: HMSO, 1988.
2.
Working Party Report in Health Studies to the University of London, Chairman: Sir John Ellis. London: University of London, 1987.
3.
National Audit Office. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. National Health Service: Control over professional and technical manpower. London: NAO, 1987.
4.
Working Together — Education and Training. Cmnd 9823. London: HMSO, 1986.
5.
Manpower Services Commission. Review of Vocational Qualifications in England and Wales: A Report by the Working Party Chairman H G DeVille. London: Department of Education and Science, 1986.
6.
Times Education Supplement 26.2.1988.
7.
DHSS. Statistical Returns 1985; Personal Social Services Statistics 1984–85. London: DHSS, 1985.
8.
Paramedical Manpower Statistics: Health Board Staff with contracts in Scotland. Edinburgh: Information Services Division, Scottish Health Service Common Services Agency, 1987.
9.
Occupational Therapists Board, Council for Professions Supplementary to Medicine. Press Release, April 1988.
