The aim of this article is to draw together and summarize the work of a variety of different theorists. Occupational therapy expands and changes to meet the needs of those requiring its services, and it progresses according to input from practising, researching and teaching therapists. The work of some major contributors is briefly outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClarkPN. Human development through occupation, Part 1. Am J Occup Ther1979; 33(8): 505–14.
2.
LyonsM. Paradise lost! Paradise regained? Putting the promise of occupational therapy into practice. Aust Occup Ther J1985; 32(2): 45–53.
3.
KielhofnerGBurkeJ. Occupational therapy after 60 years. Am J Occup Ther1977; 31(10): 675.
4.
ConteJConteW. The association: The use of conceptual models in occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther1977; 31(4): 262–64.
5.
MoseyA. Occupational therapy configuration of a profession. 2nd ed.New York: Raven Press, 1983.
6.
MoseyA. Eleanor Clark Slagle Lecture 1985: A monastic or a pluralistic approach to professional identity?Am J Occup Ther1985; 39(8): 504–9.
7.
KatzN. Occupational therapy's domain of concern: Reconsidered. Am J Occup Ther1985; 39(8): 518–24.
8.
LlorensLA. Theoretical conceptualizations of occupational therapy 1960–1982. Occup Ther Ment Health1984; 4(2): 1–14.
9.
BlackJAChampionDJ. Methods and issues in social research. New York: John Wiley, 1976.
10.
ClarkPN. Human development through occupation: A philosophy and conceptual model for practice, Part 2. Am J Occup Ther1979; 33(9): 577–84.
11.
PedrettiLW. Occupational therapy practice skills for physical dysfunction. 2nd ed.St Louis, Missouri: CV Mosby, 1985.
