Abstract
Occupational therapists are heavily involved in trying to solve the problems of disabled people and meet their long-term needs in the community. However, the efficacy of occupational therapists in solving these problems is related to the definitions of disability that they use. Being defined as disabled makes a person ‘eligible’ for the receipt of various resources. Viewed objectively, are the definitions used any help in resolving the problems of a disabled person in the community? This article implies that they may not be as helpful as occupational therapists think.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
