This paper describes movement patterns observed in a proficient user of an artificial limb. The movement of the artificial limb is compared with that of the normal limb. Information from the psychological literature on motor skills is used to interpret the observations made. The application of the results to the training of users of artificial limbs is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LambDWMacNaughtonAKMFragiakakisFG. Congenital absence of the upper limb and hand: A review of the benefits in prehension and bimanual function by early prosthetic training. Hand1971; 3(2): 193–9.
2.
MobergE. The role of cutaneous afferents in position sense, kinaesthesia, and motor function of the hand. Brain1983; 106: 1–19.
3.
FraserCWingAM. A case study of reaching by a user of a manually operated artificial hand. Prosthet Orthot Int1981; 5: 151–6.
4.
WingAMFraserC. The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Quart J Exp Psych1983; 35: 297–309.
5.
JeannerodM. Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: BaddeleyADLongJ, eds. Attention and performance IX.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
6.
KeeleSW. Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psych Bull1968; 70: 387–404.
7.
BeggsWDAHowarthCI. The movement of hands toward a target. Quart J Exp Psych1972; 24: 448–53.
