American Psychiatric Association (1964), Report of the Committee on Nomenclature, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
2.
BoysK., (1971), Designing for the handicapped, George Godwin, London.
3.
Economist Intelligence Unit, (1973), Care with dignity, An analysis of costs of care for the disabled, National Fund for Research into Crippling Diseases, Horsham.
4.
FeeneyR. J., and AinsworthA., (1973), Housing for the disabled; Part 1. An ergonomic study of the space requirements of wheelchair users for doorways and corridors, Institute for Consumer Ergonomics, Loughborough.
5.
FloydW. F., (1966), A study of the space requirements of wheelchair users.Paraplegia, E. & S. Livingstone, Edinburgh, May 1966.
6.
GoldsmithS., (1974), More able to manage, New Society, 27 June, P. 764.
GoldsmithS., (1976). Designing for the Disabled3rd Edition, R.I.B.A.
9.
HarrisA., & BuckleJ., (1971), Handicapped and Impaired in Great Britain, London, O.P.C.S.
10.
LeeT., (1971), Psychology and architectural determinism, Architects Journal (1), 4 August 1971, P. 253, 1 Sept. 1971, P. 475, 22 Sept, 1971. P. 651.
11.
IsherwoodP. A., (1970), Ergonomics and the disabled, International Rehabilitation Review, 1st quarter, 1970. P. 9.
12.
NicholsP. J. R., & BradleyW. H., (1968), Proceedings of a symposium on the motivation of the physically disabled, National Fund for Research into Crippling Diseases, London.
13.
WingJ. K., (1965), Social and psychological aspects of rehabilitation of the disabled in the U.K. Rehabilitation, April-June P. 11.
14.
WrightB. A., (1960), Physical disability. A psychological approach, Harper and Row, New York.