Too good to be true: Hidden challenges of online research recruitment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chandler

Paolacci

(2017) Lie for a dime: When most prescreening responses are honest but most study participants are impostors. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8: 194855061769820.

Davies

Monssen

Sharpe

, et al. (2024) Management of fraudulent participants in online research: Practical recommendations from a randomized controlled feasibility trial. International Journal of Eating Disorders 57: 1311–1321.

French

Babbage

Bird

, et al. (2024) Data integrity issues with web-based studies: an institutional example of a widespread challenge. JMIR Mental Health 11: e58432.

Kumarasamy

Goodfellow

Ferron

, et al. (2024) Evaluating the problem of fraudulent participants in health care research: Multimethod pilot study. JMIR Formative Research 8: e51530.

Teitcher

JEF

Bockting

Bauermeister

, et al. (2015) Detecting, preventing, and responding to ‘fraudsters’ in internet research: Ethics and tradeoffs. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43: 116–133.

Woolfall

(2023) Identifying and preventing fraudulent participation in qualitative research. Archives of Disease in Childhood 108: 421–422.