College of Occupational Therapy – Research Priority 10: What is the cost-effectiveness of Occupational Therapy services? Making the economic case for Occupational Therapy
Restricted accessEditorialFirst published online June, 2025
College of Occupational Therapy – Research Priority 10: What is the cost-effectiveness of Occupational Therapy services? Making the economic case for Occupational Therapy
AsariaMGriffinSCooksonR (2016) Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis: A tutorial. Medical Decision Making36: 8–19.
2.
DrummondMFSculpherMJClaxtonK, et al. (2015) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
FlemmingJChojeckiDTjosvoldL, et al. (2022) Quality of reporting of economic evaluations in rehabilitation research: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation44: 2233–2240.
4.
GreenSLambertR (2016) A systematic review of health economic evaluations in occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy80: 5–19.
5.
JohansonSGregersen OestergaardLBejerholmU, et al. (2023) Cost-effectiveness of occupational therapy return-to-work interventions for people with mental health disorders: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy30: 1339–1356.
6.
LoganPAHorneJCGladmanJRF, et al. (2021) Multifactorial falls prevention programme compared with usual care in UK care homes for older people: Multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. BMJ375: e066991.
7.
LomasJOchalekJFariaR (2022) Avoiding opportunity cost neglect in cost-effectiveness analysis for health technology assessment. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2022; 20: 13–18.
8.
MartinAKWardG (2024) Refocusing research: A mixed methods study to evaluate utilisation of the top 10 priorities for occupational therapy research in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Occupational Therapy87: 270–280
9.
NagayamaHTomoriKOhnoK, et al. (2016) Cost-effectiveness of occupational therapy in older people: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Occupational Therapy International23(2): 103–20.
RadfordKACravenKMcLellanV, et al. (2020) An individually randomised controlled multi-centre pragmatic trial with embedded economic and process evaluations of early vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care for stroke survivors: Study protocol for the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial. Trials21(1): 1010.
12.
RahjaMComansTClemsonL, et al. (2018) Economic evaluations of occupational therapy approaches for people with cognitive and/or functional decline: A systematic review. Health & Social Care Community. Epub ahead of print 12 March 2018.
13.
Royal College of Occupational Therapists (2016) Reducing the pressure on hospitals – A report on the value of occupational therapy in England. London: RCOT, pp. 1–27.
14.
Royal College of Occupational Therapists (2019) Royal College of Occupational Therapists’ Research and Development Strategy 2019–24. London: RCOT, pp.1–36.
15.
SamuelssonKWressleE (2015) Turning evidence into practice: Barriers to research use among occupational therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy78: 175–181.
16.
The Essence Project (2024) Economics of Social Care Compendium. Available at: https://essenceproject.uk/
17.
WalesKLangDRahjaM, et al. (2022) Economic effects of occupational therapy services for adults in acute and subacute care settings: A systematic review. American Occupational Therapy Association76: 7601180080.
18.
WatsonJCowanKSpringH, et al. (2021) Identifying research priorities for occupational therapy in the UK: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. British Journal of Occupational Therapy84: 735–744.
19.
WhiteheadPJGolding-DayMRBelshawS, et al. (2018) Bathing adaptations in the homes of older adults (BATH-OUT): Results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT). BMC Public Health18: 1293.
20.
WhiteheadPJBelshawSBradyS, et al. (2024) Bathing Adaptations in the Homes of Older Adults (BATH-OUT-2): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial, economic evaluation and process evaluation. Trials25: 75.