Evidence-based occupational therapy home programmes for children with unilateral cerebral palsy have demonstrated efficacy; however, uptake into routine practice is varied. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the therapist-perceived supports and barriers to using occupational therapy home programmes for children with unilateral cerebral palsy, based on evidence of best practice in the United Kingdom.
Method
Fourteen occupational therapists completed semi-structured telephone interviews. Using a qualitative framework analysis approach, support and barrier factors were indexed against the Theoretical Domains Framework, before being categorised more broadly using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour Model.
Findings
Common supports included: (a) strong leadership within the team to facilitate the translation of occupational therapy home programmes and evidence-based interventions into service-specific protocols; (b) knowledge exchange within professional networks and (c) mentorship. Common barriers included: (a) lack of resources; (b) restricted opportunities to review occupational therapy home programmes and (c) difficulties keeping up-to-date with the evidence in this area.
Conclusion
To be effective, occupational therapy home programmes need to be based on evidence of best practice; analysis indicated an urgent need to capture outcomes, record parental practice, further integrate ‘occupation’ within goal-setting, and develop use of conceptual models of practice to both enhance family-centred care and articulate the profession’s unique contribution.
AaronsGA (2006)
Transformational and transactional leadership: Association with attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services57(8): 1162–1169.
BennettSAllenSCaldwellE, et al. (2016)
Organisational support for evidence-based practice: Occupational therapists perceptions. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy64(1): 9–18.
4.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2015) Knowledge translation – Definition. Available at: www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html (accessed 15 July 2018).
5.
Carnahan K, Arner M and Hagglund G (2007) Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 8(1): 50–56.
6.
College of Occupational Therapists (2015) Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct.
London:
College of Occupational Therapists.
7.
ErikssonCThamKGuidettiS (2013)
Occupational therapists’ experiences in integrating a new intervention in collaboration with a researcher. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy20(4): 253–263.
8.
FearingVGLawMClarkJ (1997)
An occupational performance model: Fostering client and therapist alliances. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy64(1): 7–15.
9.
FisherGSHotchkissA (2007)
A model of occupational empowerment for marginalized populations in community environments. Occupational Therapy in Health Care22(1): 55–71.
10.
FosterLDunnWLawsonLM (2013)
Coaching mothers of children with autism: A qualitative study of occupational therapy practice. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics32(2): 253–363.
11.
GrolRWensingMEcclesM (2013) Improving Patient Care. The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice, 2nd ed.
London:
John Wiley & Sons Limited.
12.
HannaSERussellDJBartlettDJ, et al. (2007)
Measurement practices in pediatric rehabilitation: A survey of physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language therapists in Ontario. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics27(2): 25–42.
13.
JetteDUHalbertJIversonC, et al. (2009)
Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: Perceptions and applications. Physical Therapy89(2): 125–135.
14.
KarlssonUTornquistK (2007)
What do Swedish occupational therapists feel about research? A survey of perceptions, attitudes, intentions, and engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy14(4): 221–229.
15.
KingGWrightVRussellDJ (2011)
Understanding paediatric rehabilitation therapists’ lack of use of outcome measures. Disability and Rehabilitation33(25–26): 2662–2671.
16.
KlingelsKFeysHMolenaersG, et al. (2013)
Randomised trial of modified constraint induced movement therapy with and without an intensive therapy programme in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair27(9): 799–807.
17.
Krumlinde-SundolmLHolmefurMKottorpA, et al. (2007)
Assisting hand assessment: Current evidence of validity, reliability and responsiveness of change. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology49(4): 259–264.
18.
LawMBaptisteSCarwsellA, et al. (2014) The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 5th ed.
Ottawa:
CAOT Publications.
McCluskeyACusickA (2002)
Strategies for introducing evidence-based practice and changing clinician behaviour: A manager’s toolbox. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal49(2): 63–70.
21.
McConnellKJohnstonLKerrC (2012)
Therapy management of the upper limb in children with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional survey. Developmental Neurorehabilitation15(5): 343–350.
22.
McGrathMO’CallaghanC (2014)
Occupational therapy and dementia care: A survey of practice in the Republic of Ireland. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy61(2): 92–101.
23.
MichieSAtkinsLWestR (2014) The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions, 1st ed.
London:
Silverback Publishing.
24.
MiltonYMRoeSA (2017)
Occupational therapy home programmes for children with unilateral cerebral palsy using bimanual and modified constraint induced movement therapies: A critical review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy80(6): 337–349.
25.
MiltonYMDunfordCNewbyKV (2019)
Occupational therapy home programmes for children with cerebral palsy: A national survey of United Kingdom paediatric occupational therapy practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy82(7): 443–451.
26.
NovakI (2011)
Parent experience of implementing effective home programmes. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics31(2): 198–213.
27.
NovakICusickALanninN (2009)
Occupational Therapy home programmes for cerebral palsy: Double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Pediatrics24(4): 606–614.
28.
NovakKMcIntyreSMorganC, et al. (2013)
A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: State of the evidence. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology55(10): 885–910.
29.
OienIFallangBOstensjoS (2010)
Goal-setting in paediatric rehabilitation: Perceptions of parents and professional. Child Care Health and Development36(4): 558–565.
30.
PalisanoRJChiarelloLAKingGA, et al. (2011)
Participation-based therapy for children with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation34(12): 1041–1052.
31.
RosenbaumPKingSLawM, et al. (1998)
Family-centred service: A conceptual framework and research review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics18(1): 1–20.
32.
SakzewskiLZivianiJBoydRN (2014)
Delivering evidence-based upper limb rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy: Barriers and enablers identified by three pediatric teams. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics34(4): 368–383.
33.
Shikako-ThomasKFehlingsDGermainM, et al. (2018)
Current practice “constraints” in the uptake and use of intensive upper extremity training: A Canadian perspective. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics38(2): 143–156.
34.
Tinderholt MyrhaugHØstensjøSLarunL, et al. (2014)
Intensive training of motor function and functional skills among young children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatrics14(1): 292.
35.
VloothuisJBruinJMulderM, et al. (2018)
Description of the CARE4STROKE programme: A caregiver-mediated exercises intervention with e-health support for stroke patients. Physiotherapy Research International23(3): 1719–1724.
36.
World Federation of Occupational Therapy (2008) Entry Level Competencies for Occupational Therapists (Position Statement). Available at: www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx (accessed 10 November 2018).
37.
WrightFVMajnemerA (2014)
The concept of a toolbox of outcome measures for children with cerebral palsy: Why, what, and how to use?Journal of Children Neurology29(8): 1055–1065.
