Facilitating engagement in meaningful activities is a key intervention in the recovery process of people with serious mental illness. This study validates the use of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in the Spanish mental health population for the purposes of measuring such engagement.
Method
Two hundred and ninety-five people with serious mental illness (68.3% were male; M = 47.5, SD = 9.7 years) participated voluntarily and anonymously in the study. All gave written informed consent. A translation into Spanish and back-translation to English was made. Reliability and validity of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey was assessed by the internal consistency, temporal stability and dimensionality of the scale.
Results
The Cronbach’s alpha of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey scale was 0.91 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure of the scale (χ2 = 93.906, p < .001; comparative fit index = .96, Tucker–Lewis index = .95, root-mean-square error of approximation (90% confidence interval) = .05 (.03–.07) and standardized root mean square residual = .04). All the items showed significant standardized factor loadings above .59. Correlation between the two factors was .97 (p < .001).
Conclusion
The instrument could be useful for assessing engagement in meaningful activities and helpful for recovery process interventions focused on enhancing community adjustment in people with serious mental illness.
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR, 4th edn.
Washington, DC:
American Psychiatric Association.
2.
BozekATokarzA (2017)
The Polish adaptation of the engagement in meaningful activities survey (EMAS).Roczniki Psychologiczne (Annals of Psychology)20(4): 913–929.
3.
BronowskiPSawickaMRowickaM, et al. (2017)
Social networks and social functioning level among occupational therapy workshops and community-based support centers users.Psychiaria Polska51(1): 139–152.
4.
BrowneJPennDLMeyer-KalosPS, et al. (2017)
Psychological well-being and mental health recovery in the NIMH RAISE early treatment program.Schizophrenia Research185: 167–172.
5.
CarswellAMcCollMABaptisteS, et al. (2004)
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A research and clinical literature review.Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy71(4): 210–222.
6.
ChuggACraikC (2002)
Some factors influencing occupational engagement for people with schizophrenia living in the community.British Journal of Occupational Therapy65(2): 67–73.
7.
CiroCASmithP (2015)
Improving personal characterization of meaningful activity in adults with chronic conditions living in a low-income housing community.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health12(9): 11379–11395.
8.
CoffeyMHanniganBMeudellA, et al. (2019)
Quality of life, recovery and decision-making: A mixed methods study of mental health recovery in social care. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology54(6): 715–723.
9.
DoroudNFosseyEFortuneT (2015)
Recovery as an occupational journey: A scoping review exploring the links between occupational engagement and recovery for people with enduring mental health issues.Australian Occupational Therapy Journal62(6): 378–392.
10.
EakmanAM (2011)
Convergent validity of the engagement in meaningful activities survey in a college sample.OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health31(1): 23–32.
11.
EakmanAM (2012)
Measurement characteristics of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in an age-diverse sample. American Journal of Occupational Therapy66(2): e-20–e-29.
12.
EakmanAMCarlsonMEClarkFA (2010a)
Factor structure, reliability and convergent validity of the engagement in meaningful activities survey for older adults.OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health30(3): 111–121.
13.
EakmanAMCarlsonMEClarkFA (2010b)
The meaningful activity participation assessment: A measure of engagement in personally valued activities.International Journal of Aging and Human Development70(4): 299–317.
14.
Fernández-BallesterosRZammarronMDRuizMA (2001)
The contribution of socio-demographic and psychosocial factors to life satisfaction.Aging and Society21(1): 25–43.
15.
GallagherMBMuldoonOTPettigrewJ (2015)
An integrative review of social and occupational factors influencing Health and wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology6: 1281. DOI: 10.339/fpsyg.2015.01281.
GoldbergBBrintnellEGoldbergJ (2002)
The relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and quality of life in persons disabled by mental illness.Occupational Therapy in Mental Health18(2): 17–44.
18.
HammellKW (2004)
Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life.Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy71(5): 296–305.
19.
HarrisonMAngarolaRForsythK, et al. (2016)
Defining the environment to support occupational therapy intervention in mental health practice.British Journal of Occupational Therapy79(1): 57–59.
20.
HarveyCFosseyEJacksonH, et al. (2006)
Time use of people with schizophrenia living in north London: Predictors of participation in occupations and their implications for improving social inclusion.Journal of Mental Health15(1): 43–55.
21.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999)
Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural and Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
22.
KillaspyHWhiteSLalvaniN, et al. (2014)
The impact of psychosis on social inclusion and associated factors.International Journal of Social Psychiatry60(2): 148–154.
23.
KingstonTScullyPJBrowneDJ, et al. (2018)
Functional outcome and service engagement in major depressive disorder with psychotic features: Comparisons with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder in a 6-year follow-up of the Cavan-Monaghan First Episode Psychosis Study (CAMFEPS).CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics24(7): 633–640.
24.
KinnLGHolgersenHAasRW, et al. (2014) “
Balancing on skates on the icy surface of work”: A metasynthesis of work participation for persons with psychiatric disabilities.Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation24(1): 125–138.
25.
KrupaTMcLeanHEastabrookS, et al. (2003)
Daily time use as a measure of community adjustment for persons served by assertive community treatment teams.American Journal of Occupational Therapy57(5): 558–565.
26.
LacroixPAPelletierAJBlodinMP, et al. (2018)
Traduction et validation du Questionnaire sur l’engagement dans les activités significantes.Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy85(1): 11–20.
27.
MeeJSumsionTCraikC (2004)
Mental health clients confirm the value of occupation in building competence and self-identity.British Journal of Occupational Therapy67(5): 225–233.
28.
MuñizJElosuaPHambletonRK (2013)
Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición.Psicothema25(2): 151–157.
29.
MuthénLKMuthénBO (1998-2011) Mplus User’s Guide, 6th edn.
Los Angeles, CA:
Muthén and Muthén.
30.
SatorraABentlerPM (1988) Scaling Corrections for Statistics in Covariance Structure Analysis (UCLA Statistics Series 2).
Los Angeles:
University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Psychology.
31.
SweetDByngRWebberM, et al. (2018)
Personal well-being networks, social capital and severe mental illness: Exploratory study.British Journal of Psychiatry 212(5): 308–317.
32.
TanakaKDavidsonL (2015)
Meanings associated with the core component of clubhouse life: The work-ordered day.Psychiatric Quarterly86(2): 269–283.
33.
TownsendEAPolatjkoH (2007) Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well-being & Justice through Occupation.
Ottawa, ON:
CAOT Publications ACE.
34.
YerxaEJ (1998)
Health and human spirit for occupation.American Journal of Occupational Therapy52(6): 412–418.
35.
ZimolagUKrupaT (2009)
Pet ownership as a meaningful community occupation for people with serious mental illness.American Journal of Occupational Therapy63(2): 126–137.
