This study describes the self-initiated pretend play abilities of children who had sustained an acquired brain injury.
Method
A non-experimental study was conducted with 26 children with acquired brain injury (15 females, mean age 5.08 years, SD 1.58 years), who were out of post-traumatic amnesia, able to sit independently and engage in a play session. The children were assessed individually on one occasion using the Child-Initiated Pretend Play Assessment.
Findings
All children in the study presented with pretend play deficits, particularly in symbolic play. Inattention, distractibility and limited concentration were common behaviours of the children. Three quarters of the sample (76.48%) were unable to complete the time of the assessment. For many of the children the cessation of their play was sudden and abrupt, even for those who showed complex play ability.
Conclusion
Cognitive fatigue is argued to have impacted on the children’s play ability due to the considerable amount of cognitive effort required to engage in pretend play. Implications for intervention are to offer short sessions for children with acquired brain injury and pay particular attention to a child’s symbolic play within pretend play ability.
AgrestiA (2015) Foundations of Linear and Generalised Linear Models.
New Jersey:
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
2.
AnabyDLawMHannaS, et al. (2012)
Predictors of change in participation rates following acquired brain injury: Results of a longitudinal study.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology54(4): 339–346.
3.
AndersonVCatroppaCMorseS, et al. (2005)
Attentional and processing skills following traumatic brain injury in early childhood.Brain Injury19(6): 699–710.
4.
AndersonVSpencer-SmithMWoodA (2011)
Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult.Brain134(5): 2197–2221.
5.
BergenD (2002)
The role of pretend play in children’s cognitive development. Early Childhood Research and Practice4(1): 1–12.
6.
CatroppaCAndersonVMuscaraF, et al. (2009)
Educational skills: Long-term outcomes and predictors following paediatric traumatic brain injury.Neuropsychological Rehabilitation19(5): 716–732.
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) US Department of Health and Human Services.
Washington:
Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
8.
ChapmanLAWadeSLWalzSL, et al. (2010)
Clinically significant behavior problems during the initial 18 months following early childhood brain injury.Rehabilitation Psychology55(1): 48–57.
9.
DanielW (2005) Biostatistics. A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences.
New Jersey:
John Wiley and Sons.
10.
Ewing-CobbsLBarnesMAFletcherJM (2003)
Early brain injury in children: Development and reorganisation of cognitive function.Developmental Neuropsychology24(2): 669–704.
11.
FinkNStagnittiKGalvinJ (2012)
Pretend play of children with an acquired brain injury: An exploratory study.Developmental Neurorehabilitation15(5): 336–342.
12.
GalvinJMandalisA (2009)
Executive skills and their functional implications: Approaches to rehabilitation after childhood TBI.Developmental Neurorehabilitation12(5): 352–360.
13.
GalvinJFroudeEHMcAleerJ (2010b)
Children’s participation in home, school and community life after acquired brain injury.Australian Occupational Therapy Journal57(2): 118–126.
14.
GalvinJLimBSteerK, et al. (2010a)
Predictors of functional ability of Australian children with acquired brain injury following inpatient rehabilitation.Brain Injury24(7): 1008–1016.
15.
GermanTPNiehausJLRoartyMP, et al. (2004)
Neural correlates of detecting pretense: Automatic engagement of the intentional stance under covert conditions.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience16(10): 1805–1817.
16.
HughesCLeekamS (2004)
What are the links between theory of mind and social links? Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development.Social Development13(4): 590–691.
17.
JohnsonWGriswoldD (2017)
Traumatic brain injury: A global challenge.The Lancet Neurology16(12): 949–950.
18.
KohlADWhylieGRGenovaHM, et al. (2009)
The neural correlates of cognitive fatigue in traumatic brain injury using functional MRI.Brain Injury23(5): 420–432.
19.
LawM (2002)
Participation in the occupations of everyday life.American Journal of Occupational Therapy56(6): 640–649.
20.
LillardAPinkhamAMSmithE (2010) Pretend play and cognitive development. In: GoswamiU (ed.) Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development.
Oxford, United Kingdom:
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp.285–311.
21.
LinSKTsaiCHLiHJ, et al. (2017)
Theory of mind predominantly associated with the quality, not quantity, of pretend play in children with autism spectrum disorder.European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry26(10): 1187–1196.
22.
MaasIMenonKAdelsonD, et al. (2017)
Traumatic brain injury: Integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research.The Lancet Neurology16(12): 987–1048.
23.
McKinlayALindenMDePompeiR, et al. (2016)
Service provision for children and young people with acquired brain injury: Practice recommendations.Brain Injury30(13–14): 1656–1664.
24.
NicolopoulouAIlgazH (2013)
What do we know about pretend play and narrative development? A response to Lillard, Lerner, Hopkins, Dore, Smith and Palmquist on “The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence”.American Journal of Play6(1): 55–81.
25.
ParhamLDPrimeauLA (2008) Play and Occupational Therapy for Children.
St. Louis, MO:
Mosby Elsevier.
26.
PerryBD (2006) The neurosequential model of therapeutics: Applying principles of neuroscience to clinical work with traumatized and maltreated children. In: WebbNB (ed.) Working with Traumatized Youth in Child Welfare.
New York, NY:
Guilford Press, pp.27–52.
27.
PfeiferLPacciulioAMAbrão dos SantosC, et al. (2011)
Pretend play of children with cerebral palsy.Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics31(4): 390–402.
28.
PortneyLGWatkinsMP (2000) Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice.
New Jersey:
Prentice Hall.
29.
RushworthN (2008) Brain Injury Australia. Policy Paper: Children, Young People and Acquired Brain Injury.
Canberra:
Department of Families, Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Available at: www.braininuryaustralia.org.au (accessed 8 June 2018).
30.
RyanNBeauchampMBeareR, et al. (2016)
Uncovering cortico-striatal correlates of cognitive fatigue in pediatric acquired brain disorder: Evidence from traumatic brain injury.Cortex83: 222–230.
31.
SmithLBJonesSS (2011)
Symbolic play connects to language through visual object recognition.Developmental Science14(5): 1142–1149.
32.
StagnittiK (2007) The Child-Initiated Pretend Play Assessment (ChIPPA). Manual.
Brunswick, Australia:
Co-ordinates Publications.
33.
StagnittiK (2017) A growing brain – A growing imagination. In: PrendivilleEHowardJ (eds) Creative Psychotherapy. Applying the Principles of Neurobiology to Play and Expressive Arts-Based Practice.
Oxon:
Routledge, pp.185–200.
34.
StagnittiKLewisFM (2015)
The importance of the quality of preschool children’s pretend play ability to the subsequent development of semantic organisation and narrative re-telling skills in early primary school.International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology17(2): 148–158.
35.
StagnittiKUnsworthC (2004)
The test-retest reliability of the child-initiated pretend play assessment.American Journal of Occupational Therapy58(1): 93–99.
36.
StagnittiKUnsworthCRodgerS (2000)
Development of an assessment to identify play behaviors that discriminate between the play of typical pre-schoolers and pre-schoolers with pre-academic problems.Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy67(4): 291–303.
37.
SwindellsDStagnittiK (2006)
Pretend play and parents’ view of social competence: The construct validity of the Child-Initiated Pretend Play Assessment.Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy53(4): 314–324.
38.
WhitebreadDO’SullivanL (2012)
Preschool children’s social pretend play, supporting the development of metacommunication, metacognition and self-regulation.International Journal of Play1(2): 197–213.
39.
WhiteheadCMarchantJLCraikD, et al. (2009)
Neural correlates of observing pretend play in which one object is represented as another.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience4(4): 369–378.
40.
World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
Geneva:
World Health Organization.
