Everyday technology has the potential to increase quality of life for individuals with disabilities. In a society that relies on technology for participation, exploring everyday technology use is a fundamental part of understanding lived experiences of occupation. The meaning and roles individuals with disabilities ascribe to technology may be influenced by sociocultural considerations, such as gender. This interpretive phenomenological study aimed to present an occupational perspective of everyday technology use for men with multiple sclerosis.
Method
Three middle-aged men (50–57 years old) with multiple sclerosis participated in an individual semi-structured interview. Data were analysed using a hermeneutic approach of close reading. After the initial analysis, superordinate themes were examined relative to an occupational framework.
Findings
The identified themes were ‘searching online as means and end’ (doing); ‘connecting to others and society’ (belonging); and ‘seeing present and future self’ (being and becoming).
Conclusion
The meaning of occupational experiences of everyday technology for men with multiple sclerosis are influenced by master narratives of masculinity. Since everyday technology is intertwined with multiple dimensions of occupation, facilitating its use may promote health and quality of life.
BrayF (2007) Gender and technology. Annual Review of Anthropology36(1): 37–53.
2.
CasettaIRiiseTWamme NortvedtMet al.(2009) Gender differences in health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis15(11): 1339–1346.
3.
ChoJ (2015) Roles of smartphone app use in improving social capital and reducing social isolation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking18(6): 350–355.
4.
ChoJLeeHE (2017) Contextualization of motivations determining the continuance intention to use smart devices among people with physical disabilities. Telematics and Informatics34(1): 338–350.
EngstromALLLexellJLundML (2010) Difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury: A qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy17(3): 233–243.
7.
FallahpourMKottorpANygårdLet al.(2015) Participation after acquired brain injury: Associations with everyday technology and activities in daily life. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy22(5): 366–376.
8.
FrostJGroseJBrittenN (2017) A qualitative investigation of lay perspectives of diagnosis and self-management strategies employed by people with progressive multiple sclerosis. Health21(3): 316–336.
9.
HaaseRSchultheissTKempckeRet al.(2012) Use and acceptance of electronic communication by patients with multiple sclerosis: A multicenter questionnaire study. Journal of Medical Internet Research14(5): e135.
10.
HammackPL (2011) Narrative and the politics of meaning. Narrative Inquiry21(2): 311–318.
11.
HedmanALindqvistENygårdL (2016) How older adults with mild cognitive impairment relate to technology as part of present and future everyday life: A qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics16: 73.
12.
HedmanANygårdLKottorpA (2017) Everyday technology use related to activity involvement among people in cognitive decline. American Journal of Occupational Therapy71(5): 7105190040.
13.
HowardJTrevickSYoungerDS (2016) Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Neurologic Clinics34(4): 919–939.
14.
HughesJC (2016) Social construction of gender: Stories of multiple sclerosis care. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research10(3): 180–196.
15.
KalinaJTHinojosaJ (2016) A protocol for improving loneliness in people with multiple sclerosis. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health32(2): 130–145.
16.
KottorpANygårdLHedmanAet al.(2016) Access to and use of everyday technology among older people: An occupational justice issue – but for whom?. Journal of Occupational Science23(3): 382–388.
17.
KraftGKennedyPLowensteinNet al.(2009) Staying connected: The use of computer-related accessible technology among people with MS. International Journal of MS Care11(S1): 1–16.
18.
LysandropoulosAPHavrdovaE (2015) ‘Hidden’ factors influencing quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neurology22(S2): 28–33.
19.
MacdonaldSJClaytonJ (2013) Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disability & Society28(5): 702–718.
20.
MarrieRASalterARTyryTet al.(2013) Preferred sources of health information in persons with multiple sclerosis: Degree of trust and information sought. Journal of Medical Internet Research15(4): e67.
21.
MatuaGAVan Der WalDM (2015) Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches. Nurse Researcher22(6): 22–27.
22.
NamS-JParkE-Y (2017) The effects of the smart environment on the information divide experienced by people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal10(2): 257–263.
23.
NygårdLRosenbergL (2016) How attention to everyday technology could contribute to modern occupational therapy: A focus group study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy79(8): 467–474.
24.
OkoroFOBarksdaleDJ (2017) The influences of gender on peer support in chronic illness self-management: An overview. The ABNF Journal28(2): 44–52.
RibbonsKAMcElduffPBozCet al.(2015) Male sex is independently associated with faster disability accumulation in relapse-onset MS but not in primary progressive MS. PLoS ONE10(6): e0122686.
27.
RiessmanCK (2003) Performing identities in illness narrative: Masculinity and multiple sclerosis. Qualitative Research3(1): 5–33.
28.
RosenbergLNygårdL (2016) Learning and knowing technology as lived experience in people with Alzheimer's disease: A phenomenological study. Aging & Mental Health21(12): 1272–1279.
29.
RosenbergLNygårdLKottorpA (2009) Everyday technology use questionnaire: Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of competence in technology use. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health29(2): 52–62.
30.
ShuttleworthRWedgewoodNWilsonNJ (2012) The dilemma of disabled masculinity. Men and Masculinities15(2): 174–194.
31.
SmithRO (2017) Technology and occupation: Past, present, and the next 100 years of theory and practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy71(6): 7106150010.
SynnotAJHillSJGarnerKAet al.(2014) Online health information seeking: How people with multiple sclerosis find, assess and integrate treatment information to manage their health. Health Expectations19(3): 727–737.
34.
UptonDTaylorC (2015) What are the support needs of men with multiple sclerosis, and are they being met?. International Journal of MS Care17(1): 9–12.
35.
WilcockAAHockingC (2015) An Occupational Perspective of Health, 3rd ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK.
