Qualitative meta-synthesis draws together data from multiple studies and can enrich understandings of client experiences and inform health policy. Meta-ethnography is the most commonly utilised qualitative synthesis approach in healthcare; however, there is variation in the conduct and quality of many published meta-ethnographies. This paper aims to guide occupational therapists on the process of completing a meta-ethnography.
Method
A systematic search of articles published from 1986–2016 was conducted. Studies which described an evaluation or critique of meta-ethnography as a research method, and consequently provided reflections or guidance on the method, were included. Two authors independently screened papers and nine relevant papers and one key text were identified. Two authors independently extracted data from identified sources.
Results
The seven stages of meta-ethnography described by Noblit and Hare (1988) are presented and integrated with key advancements from subsequent publications. Stages include starting the meta-synthesis, consideration of relevant studies, reading the studies and deciding on how they should be put together, translating the studies into one another, synthesising translations and expressing the synthesis.
Conclusion
Given the proliferation of qualitative methods in occupational therapy research, rigorous use of meta-ethnography has great potential to contribute to the research evidence base.
AtkinsSLewinSSmithHet al.(2008) Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology8: 21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21.
2.
Barnett-PageEThomasJ (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology9: 59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.
3.
CampbellRPoundPMorganMet al.(2011) Evaluating meta-ethnography: Systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment15(43): 1–164. doi: 10.3310/hta15430.
4.
ClassenSAlvarezL (2015) Evidence-Informed Reviews—Moving Occupational Therapy Practice and Science Forward, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
5.
ClassenSWinterSLopezE (2009) Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on older driver safety and mobility. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health29(1): 24–31.
6.
DoyleLH (2003) Synthesis through meta-ethnography: Paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities. Qualitative Research3(3): 321–344.
7.
FosseyEHarveyC (2010) Finding and sustaining employment: A qualitative meta-synthesis of mental health consumer views. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy77(5): 303–314.
8.
FranceERingNNoyesJet al.(2015) Protocol-developing meta-ethnography reporting guidelines (eMERGe). BMC Medical Research Methodology15: 103. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0068-0.
9.
FranceEFRingNThomasRet al.(2014) A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting. BMC Medical Research Methodology14: 119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-119.
10.
FranceEFWellsMLangHet al.(2016) Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis. Systematic Reviews5(1): 44. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4.
11.
Frostad LiasetILoråsH (2016) Perceived factors in return to work after acquired brain injury: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy23(6): 446–457.
12.
GibbsDBoshoffKStanleyM (2015) Becoming the parent of a preterm infant: A meta-ethnographic synthesis. British Journal of Occupational Therapy78(8): 475–487.
13.
HammellKW (2001) Using qualitative research to inform the client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy64(5): 228–234.
14.
HammellKW (2007) Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal cord45(2): 124–139.
15.
HannesKMacaitisK (2012) A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: Update on a review of published papers. Qualitative Research12(4): 402–442.
16.
LeeRPHartRIWatsonRMet al.(2015) Qualitative synthesis in practice: Some pragmatics of meta-ethnography. Qualitative Research15(3): 334–350.
17.
MalpassAShawASharpDet al.(2009) “Medication career” or “Moral career”? The two sides of managing antidepressants: A meta-ethnography of patients’ experience of antidepressants. Social Science & Medicine68(1): 154–168.
18.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJet al.(2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine6: e1000097.
19.
Murray C and Stanley M (2015) Meta-synthesis demystified: Connecting islands of knowledge. In: Nayar S and Stanley M (eds) (2015) Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy. New York: Routledge, 174–189.
20.
Murray C, Turpin M, Edwards I, et al. (2015) A qualitative meta-synthesis about challenges experienced in occupational therapy practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 78(9): 534–546.
21.
Nayar S and Stanley M (2015) Beginning conversations. In: Nayar S and Stanley M (eds) Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy. New York: Routledge, 1-7.
PoundPBrittenNMorganMet al.(2005) Resisting medicines: A synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Social Science & Medicine61(1): 133–155.
24.
ShamrockHGrayMCameronMet al.(2016) Physical disabilities in Asia: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature written in English. British Journal of Occupational Therapy79(9): 565–573.
25.
Stanley M and Nayar S (2015) Deepening understandings. In: Nayar S and Stanley M (eds) Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy. Oxford: Routledge, 8–20.
26.
StrikeKPosnerG (1983) ‘Types of Synthesis and their Criteria’. In: WardSReedL (eds) Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for Synthesis and Interpretation, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 343–362.
27.
ThorneS (2017) Metasynthetic madness: What kind of monster have we created?Qualitative Health Research27(1): 3–12.
28.
ThorneSE (2015) Qualitative metasynthesis: A technical exercise or a source of new knowledge?Psycho-Oncology24(11): 1347–1348.
29.
TongAFlemmingKMcInnesEet al.(2012) Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology12: 181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.
30.
ToyeFSeersKAllcockNet al.(2013) ‘Trying to pin down jelly’ – Exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography. BMC Medical Research Methodology13: 46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-80.
31.
ToyeFSeersKAllcockNet al.(2014) Meta-ethnography 25 years on: Challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology14: 80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-80.
32.
TriccoACSoobiahCAntonyJet al.(2016) A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology73: 19–28.
33.
Williams S and Murray C (2013) The experience of engaging in occupation following stroke: A qualitative meta-synthesis. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 76(8): 370–378.
34.
YorkMWisemanT (2012) Gardening as an occupation: A critical review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy75(2): 76–84.
