Few ecologically valid assessment tools are available for occupational therapists to evaluate the cognitive demands and performance of women with breast cancer in the workplace. This study aims to identify difficulties in work-related cognitive strategy use experienced by women with breast cancer using the Perceive, Recall, Plan, and Perform (PRPP) System of Task Analysis.
Method
Deductive content analysis was used to code secondary data from 10 interview transcripts involving women who had breast cancer and experienced difficulties in everyday cognitive functioning after treatment. Thirty-four PRPP cognitive strategy items were used as pre-determined codes in a secondary analysis to identify and quantify specific cognitive difficulties described by the women.
Results
The 10 women experienced problems with work tasks that required the cognitive strategies related to the ‘programming’, ‘continuing’, and ‘attending’ processing categories of the PRPP system. In addition, the women demonstrated strengths in their capacity to evaluate their own thinking and performance.
Conclusion
This pilot study indicated the need for further research to determine how cognitive impairments which may occur after breast cancer treatment impact on occupational performance in a complex work environment. The PRPP System of Task Analysis was identified as a potentially useful measurement and interview tool for this purpose.
AhlesTARootJCRyanEL (2012) Cancer- and cancer treatment-associated cognitive change: An update on the state of the science. Journal of Clinical Oncology30(30): 3675–3686.
2.
AubinGLamoureuxJGelinasI (2014) Daily task performance and information processing among people with schizophrenia and healthy controls: A comparative study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy77(9): 466–474.
3.
BeckerHHenneghanAMikanSQ (2015) When do I get my brain back?Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing19(2): 180–184.
4.
BootesKChapparoC (2010) Difficulties with multitasking on return to work after TBI: A critical case study. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation36(2): 207–216.
5.
BootesKChapparoC (2013) Cognitive strategy application: Measuring the impact of acquired brain injury on return to work. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal60(Suppl. 1): 107.
6.
BoykoffNMoieniMSubramanianSK (2009) Confronting chemobrain: An in-depth look at survivors’ reports of impact on work, social networks, and health care response. Journal of Cancer Survivorship3(4): 223–232.
7.
CalvioLPeugeotMBrunsGL (2010) Measures of cognitive function and work in occupationally active breast cancer survivors. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine52(2): 219–227.
8.
CastellonSAGanzPABowerJE (2004) Neurocognitive performance in breast cancer survivors exposed to adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology26(7): 955–969.
9.
Chapparo C and Ranka J (2014) The perceive, recall, plan & perform system assessment course manual (Available from authors chris.chapparo@sydney.edu.au and jranka@bigpond.net.au).
10.
ChapparoCLoweSHeardR (2013) ThePRPP@school (teacher questionnaire): Examination of discriminant validity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal60(Suppl. 1): 61.
11.
DuijtsSFAvan EgmondMPSpeltenE (2014) Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology23(5): 481–492.
12.
FergusonRJMcDonaldBCSaykinAJ (2007) Brain structure and function differences in monozygotic twins: Possible effects of breast cancer chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology25(25): 3866–3870.
13.
GubaEGLincolnYS (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 191–215.
14.
InagakiMYoshikawaEMatsuokaY (2007) Smaller regional volumes of brain gray and white matter demonstrated in breast cancer survivors exposed to adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer109(9): 146–156.
15.
LindnerOCPhillipsBMcCabeMG (2014) A meta-analysis of cognitive impairment following adult cancer chemotherapy. Neuropsychology28(5): 726–740.
16.
LinnRLGronlundNE (2000) Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
MackenzieNKnipeS (2006) Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research16(2): 193–205.
18.
MizunoKTanakaMYamagutiK (2011) Mental fatigue caused by prolonged cognitive load associated with sympathetic hyperactivity. Behavioral and Brain Functions7(17): 1–7.
19.
MooreHCF (2014) An overview of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction, or ‘chemobrain’. Oncology28(9): 797–804.
20.
MunirFBurrowsJYarkerJ (2010) Women’s perceptions of chemotherapy-induced cognitive side effects on work ability: A focus group study. Journal of Clinical Nursing19(9–10): 1362–1370.
21.
NelsonWSulsJPadgettL (2014) Understanding ‘chemobrain’: A challenge and invitation for psychological scientists. Observer27: 1.
22.
NeuendorfK (2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
NewmanR (2013) An occupational therapy perspective in addressing breast-cancer-related cognitive dysfunction in the survivorship phase. Physical Disabilities Special Interest Section Quarterly36(1): 1–3.
24.
NottMTChapparoC (2012) Exploring the validity of the perceive, recall, plan and perform system of task analysis: Cognitive strategy use in adults with brain injury. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy75(6): 256–263.
25.
OberstKBradleyCJGardinerJC (2010) Work task disability in employed breast and prostate cancer patients. Journal of Cancer Survivorship4(4): 322–330.
26.
OttatiAFeuersteinM (2013) Brief self-report measure of work-related cognitive limitations in breast cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship7(2): 262–273.
27.
PlayerLMackenzieLWillisK (2014) Women’s experiences of cognitive changes or ‘chemobrain’ following treatment for breast cancer: A role for occupational therapy?Australian Occupational Therapy Journal61(4): 230–240.
28.
RankaJChapparoC (2010) Assessment of productivity performance in men with HIV associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation36(2): 193–206.
29.
Reid-ArndtSAYeeAPerryMC (2009) Cognitive and psychological factors associated with early post-treatment functional outcomes in breast cancer survivors. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology27(4): 415–434.
ShawLStrongS (2008) A client-centered framework for therapists in ergonomics. In: JacobsK (ed.) Ergonomics for Therapists, 3rd ed. Mosby, MO: Elsevier, pp. 17–36.
32.
SilvermanDHSDyCJCastellonSA (2007) Altered frontocortical, cerebellar, and basal ganglia activity in adjuvant-treated breast cancer survivors 5–10 years after chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Research & Treatment103(3): 303–311.
33.
SmidtK (2014) The Perceptions of Australian Oncologists Regarding Cognitive Changes in Cancer Survivors. Occupational Therapy, Sydney: University of Sydney.
34.
Tager FA, McKinley PS, Schnabel FR, et al. (2010) The cognitive effects of chemotherapy in post-menopausal breast cancer patients: A controlled longitudinal study. Breast Cancer Research & Treatment 123(1): 25–34. [Erratum appears in Breast Cancer Research & Treatment. 2011; 126: 271–272.].
35.
VardyJDhillonH (2011) Cognitive function in cancer survivors. In: DavisM (eds) Supportive Oncology, Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, pp. 448–455.
36.
VodermaierA (2009) Breast cancer treatment and cognitive function: The current state of evidence, underlying mechanisms and potential treatments. Women’s Health5(5): 503–516.
37.
Von AhDTallmanEF (2015) Perceived cognitive function in breast cancer survivors: Evaluating relationships with objective cognitive performance and other symptoms using the functional assessment of cancer therapy–cognitive function instrument. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management49(4): 697–706.
38.
WefelJSLenziRTheriaultRL (2004) The cognitive sequelae of standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast carcinoma: Results of a prospective, randomized, longitudinal trial. Cancer100(11): 2292–2299.
