Understanding the dimensions of home for people returning home post stroke rehabilitation

Abstract

Introduction

Home is a meaningful and important place and the transition to home from hospital is considered a significant point in recovery for people after stroke. Six dimensions of the home environment have previously been described as important for well-being and contributing to one's experience of home: the physical, social, personal, temporal, occupational and societal dimensions. The aim of this study was to understand the experience of home for people with stroke after discharge to home from hospital rehabilitation.

Method

A secondary template analysis applied the dimensions of home to semi-structured interviews that explored the transition to home experience for seven participants with stroke at 4–6 weeks post discharge.

Results

All six dimensions were present in the descriptions of returning to home from stroke rehabilitation. The social, personal and occupational dimensions appeared to be the most prominent and often centred on loss or change.

Conclusion

People returning home after a stroke enter a different home environment than the one they experienced prior to stroke, with changes experienced in all dimensions of home. Closer attention to the dimensions during discharge preparation may enhance the transition experience.

Keywords

Cerebrovascular accident dimensions of home transition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

HP Jr

Davis

Leira

(1999) Baseline NIH stroke scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: A report of the trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST). Neurology 52: 126–131.

Aplin

de Jonge

Gustafsson

(2013) Understanding the dimensions of home that impact on home modification decision making. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 60(2): 101–109.

Aplin

de Jonge

Gustafsson

(2015) Understanding home modifications impact on clients and their family's experience of home: A qualitative study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 62(2): 123–131.

Bulley

Shiels

Wilkie

(2010) Carer experiences of life after stroke - a qualitative analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation 32(17): 1406–1413.

Clarke

Rubenach

Winsor

(2003) A randomized controlled trial of an education and counselling intervention for families after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 17: 703–712.

Cott

Wiles

Devitt

(2007) Continuity, transition and participation: Preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 29(20–21): 1566–1574.

Dahlin-Ivanoff

Haak

Fange

(2007) The multiple meaning of home as experienced by very old Swedish people. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 14(1): 25–32.

De Jonge

Jones

Phillips

(2011) Understanding the essence of home: Older people's experience of home in Australia. Occupational Therapy International 18(1): 39–47.

Depres

(1991) The meaning of home: Literature review and directions for future research and theoretical development. The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 8(2): 96–115.

10.

Ellis-Hill

Robinson

Wiles

(2009) Going home to get on with life: Patients and carers experiences of being discharged from hospital following a stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 31(2): 61–72.

11.

Granger

(1993) Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM), 4th ed. Buffalo: State University of New York.

12.

Gustafsson

Bootle

(2013) Client and carer experience of transition home from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 35(16): 1380–1386.

13.

Gustafsson

Hodson

Fleming

(2014) The impact of STRENGTH on the expected and actual transition experience. Disability and Rehabilitation 36(26): 2244–2251.

14.

Hawkins

Stewart

(2002) Changing rooms: The impact of adaptations on the meaning of home for a disabled person and the role of occupational therapists in the process. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 65(2): 81–87.

15.

Kim

Warren

Madill

(1999) Quality of life of stroke survivors. Quality of Life Research 8: 293–301.

16.

King N (2014) What is template analysis? Available at: http://www.hud.ac.uk/hhs/research/template-analysis/what-is-template-analysis/ (accessed 15 November 2014).

17.

McKenna

Liddle

Brown

(2009) Comparison of time use, role participation and life satisfaction of older people after stroke with a sample without stroke. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 56: 177–188.

18.

Oswald

Wahl

(2005) Dimensions of the meaning of home in later life. In: Rowles

Chaudhury

(eds) Home and Identity in Late Life International Perspectives, New York: Springer, pp. 21–45.

19.

Sanford

Bruce

(2010) Measuring the impact of the physical environment. In: Mpofu

Oakland

(eds) Rehabilitation and Health Assessment, New York: Springer, pp. 207–228. .

20.

Sixsmith

(1986) The meaning of home: An exploratory study of environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology 6: 281–298.

21.

Smith

(1994) The essential qualities of a home. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14(1): 31–46.

22.

Tanner

(2011) The home environment. In: Ainsworth

de Jonge

(eds) An Occupational Therapists Guide to Home Modification Practice, Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated, pp. 3–16.

23.

Tanner

Tilse

de Jonge

(2008) Restoring and sustaining home: The impact of home modifications on the meaning of home for older people. Journal of Housing for the Elderly 22(3): 195–215.

24.

Werner

Altman

Oxley

(1985) Temporal aspects of home: A transactional perspective. In: Altman

Werner

(eds) Home Environments Volume 8, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 1–32.

25.

White

Mackenzie

Magin

(2008) The occupational experience of stroke survivors in a community setting. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health 28(4): 160–167.

26.

Wohlin Wottrich

Astrom

Lofgren

(2012) On parallel tracks: Newly home from hospital - people with stroke describe their expectations. Disability and Rehabilitation 34(14): 1218–1224.

27.

Yesavage

Sheikh

(1986) Geriatric depression scale (GDS). Clinical Gerontology 5: 163–173.